Overview workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Add and manage evaluation results in Hugging Face model cards. Supports extracting eval tables from README content, importing scores from Artificial Analysis API, and running custom model evaluations with vLLM/lighteval. Works with the model-index metadata format and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Overview workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Add and manage evaluation results in Hugging Face model cards. Supports extracting eval tables from README content, importing scores from Artificial Analysis API, and running custom model evaluations with vLLM/lighteval. Works with the model-index metadata format and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
This public intake copy packages plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/hugging-face-evaluation from https://github.com/sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills into the native Omni Skills editorial shape without hiding its origin.
Use it when the operator needs the upstream workflow, support files, and repository context to stay intact while the public validator and private enhancer continue their normal downstream flow.
This intake keeps the copied upstream files intact and uses the external_source block in metadata.json plus ORIGIN.md as the provenance anchor for review.
Overview This skill provides tools to add structured evaluation results to Hugging Face model cards. It supports multiple methods for adding evaluation data: - Extracting existing evaluation tables from README content - Importing benchmark scores from Artificial Analysis - Running custom model evaluations with vLLM or accelerate backends (lighteval/inspect-ai)
Imported source sections that did not map cleanly to the public headings are still preserved below or in the support files. Notable imported sections: Integration with HF Ecosystem, Core Dependencies, Inference Provider Evaluation, vLLM Custom Model Evaluation (GPU required), ⚠️ CRITICAL: Check for Existing PRs Before Creating New Ones, 1. Inspect and Extract Evaluation Tables from README.
When to Use This Skill
Use this section as the trigger filter. It should make the activation boundary explicit before the operator loads files, runs commands, or opens a pull request.
You need to add structured evaluation results to a Hugging Face model card.
You want to import benchmark data or run custom evaluations with vLLM, lighteval, or inspect-ai.
You are preparing leaderboard-compatible model-index metadata for a model release.
Use when the request clearly matches the imported source intent: Add and manage evaluation results in Hugging Face model cards. Supports extracting eval tables from README content, importing scores from Artificial Analysis API, and running custom model evaluations with....
Use when the operator should preserve upstream workflow detail instead of rewriting the process from scratch.
Use when provenance needs to stay visible in the answer, PR, or review packet.
Operating Table
Situation
Start here
Why it matters
First-time use
metadata.json
Confirms repository, branch, commit, and imported path through the block before touching the copied workflow
external_source
Provenance review
ORIGIN.md
Gives reviewers a plain-language audit trail for the imported source
Workflow execution
SKILL.md
Starts with the smallest copied file that materially changes execution
Supporting context
SKILL.md
Adds the next most relevant copied source file without loading the entire package
Handoff decision
## Related Skills
Helps the operator switch to a stronger native skill when the task drifts
Workflow
This workflow is intentionally editorial and operational at the same time. It keeps the imported source useful to the operator while still satisfying the public intake standards that feed the downstream enhancer flow.
Confirm the user goal, the scope of the imported workflow, and whether this skill is still the right router for the task.
Read the overview and provenance files before loading any copied upstream support files.
Load only the references, examples, prompts, or scripts that materially change the outcome for the current request.
Execute the upstream workflow while keeping provenance and source boundaries explicit in the working notes.
Validate the result against the upstream expectations and the evidence you can point to in the copied files.
Escalate or hand off to a related skill when the work moves out of this imported workflow's center of gravity.
Before merge or closure, record what was used, what changed, and what the reviewer still needs to verify.
Imported Workflow Notes
Imported: Integration with HF Ecosystem
Model Cards: Updates model-index metadata for leaderboard integration
Artificial Analysis: Direct API integration for benchmark imports
Papers with Code: Compatible with their model-index specification
Jobs: Run evaluations directly on Hugging Face Jobs with uv integration
vLLM: Efficient GPU inference for custom model evaluation
lighteval: HuggingFace's evaluation library with vLLM/accelerate backends
inspect-ai: UK AI Safety Institute's evaluation framework
Version
1.3.0
Dependencies
Examples
Example 1: Ask for the upstream workflow directly
Use @hugging-face-evaluation-v2 to handle <task>. Start from the copied upstream workflow, load only the files that change the outcome, and keep provenance visible in the answer.
Explanation: This is the safest starting point when the operator needs the imported workflow, but not the entire repository.
Example 2: Ask for a provenance-grounded review
Review @hugging-face-evaluation-v2 against metadata.json and ORIGIN.md, then explain which copied upstream files you would load first and why.
Explanation: Use this before review or troubleshooting when you need a precise, auditable explanation of origin and file selection.
Example 3: Narrow the copied support files before execution
Use @hugging-face-evaluation-v2 for <task>. Load only the copied references, examples, or scripts that change the outcome, and name the files explicitly before proceeding.
Explanation: This keeps the skill aligned with progressive disclosure instead of loading the whole copied package by default.
Example 4: Build a reviewer packet
Review @hugging-face-evaluation-v2 using the copied upstream files plus provenance, then summarize any gaps before merge.
Explanation: This is useful when the PR is waiting for human review and you want a repeatable audit packet.
Best Practices
Treat the generated public skill as a reviewable packaging layer around the upstream repository. The goal is to keep provenance explicit and load only the copied source material that materially improves execution.
Keep the imported skill grounded in the upstream repository; do not invent steps that the source material cannot support.
Prefer the smallest useful set of support files so the workflow stays auditable and fast to review.
Keep provenance, source commit, and imported file paths visible in notes and PR descriptions.
Point directly at the copied upstream files that justify the workflow instead of relying on generic review boilerplate.
Treat generated examples as scaffolding; adapt them to the concrete task before execution.
Route to a stronger native skill when architecture, debugging, design, or security concerns become dominant.
Troubleshooting
Problem: The operator skipped the imported context and answered too generically
Symptoms: The result ignores the upstream workflow in plugins/antigravity-awesome-skills/skills/hugging-face-evaluation, fails to mention provenance, or does not use any copied source files at all.
Solution: Re-open metadata.json, ORIGIN.md, and the most relevant copied upstream files. Check the external_source block first, then restate the provenance before continuing.
Problem: The imported workflow feels incomplete during review
Symptoms: Reviewers can see the generated SKILL.md, but they cannot quickly tell which references, examples, or scripts matter for the current task.
Solution: Point at the exact copied references, examples, scripts, or assets that justify the path you took. If the gap is still real, record it in the PR instead of hiding it.
Problem: The task drifted into a different specialization
Symptoms: The imported skill starts in the right place, but the work turns into debugging, architecture, design, security, or release orchestration that a native skill handles better.
Solution: Use the related skills section to hand off deliberately. Keep the imported provenance visible so the next skill inherits the right context instead of starting blind.
Related Skills
@00-andruia-consultant - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@00-andruia-consultant-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@10-andruia-skill-smith - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
@10-andruia-skill-smith-v2 - Use when the work is better handled by that native specialization after this imported skill establishes context.
Additional Resources
Use this support matrix and the linked files below as the operator packet for this imported skill. They should reflect real copied source material, not generic scaffolding.
Resource family
What it gives the reviewer
Example path
references
copied reference notes, guides, or background material from upstream
references/n/a
examples
worked examples or reusable prompts copied from upstream
examples/n/a
scripts
upstream helper scripts that change execution or validation
scripts/n/a
agents
routing or delegation notes that are genuinely part of the imported package
agents/n/a
assets
supporting assets or schemas copied from the source package
Merge Support: Add evaluations to existing model cards without overwriting
Validation: Ensure compliance with Papers with Code specification
Batch Operations: Process multiple models efficiently
Imported: Core Dependencies
huggingface_hub>=0.26.0
markdown-it-py>=3.0.0
python-dotenv>=1.2.1
pyyaml>=6.0.3
requests>=2.32.5
re (built-in)
Imported: Inference Provider Evaluation
inspect-ai>=0.3.0
inspect-evals
openai
Imported: vLLM Custom Model Evaluation (GPU required)
lighteval[accelerate,vllm]>=0.6.0
vllm>=0.4.0
torch>=2.0.0
transformers>=4.40.0
accelerate>=0.30.0
Note: vLLM dependencies are installed automatically via PEP 723 script headers when using uv run.
IMPORTANT: Using This Skill
Imported: ⚠️ CRITICAL: Check for Existing PRs Before Creating New Ones
Before creating ANY pull request with --create-pr, you MUST check for existing open PRs:
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py get-prs --repo-id "username/model-name"
If open PRs exist:
DO NOT create a new PR - this creates duplicate work for maintainers
Warn the user that open PRs already exist
Show the user the existing PR URLs so they can review them
Only proceed if the user explicitly confirms they want to create another PR
This prevents spamming model repositories with duplicate evaluation PRs.
All paths are relative to the directory containing this SKILL.md
file.
Before running any script, first cd to that directory or use the full
path.
Use --help for the latest workflow guidance. Works with plain Python or uv run:
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py --help
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py inspect-tables --help
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py extract-readme --help
Key workflow (matches CLI help):
get-prs → check for existing open PRs first
inspect-tables → find table numbers/columns
extract-readme --table N → prints YAML by default
add --apply (push) or --create-pr to write changes
Core Capabilities
Imported: 1. Inspect and Extract Evaluation Tables from README
Inspect Tables: Use inspect-tables to see all tables in a README with structure, columns, and sample rows
Parse Markdown Tables: Accurate parsing using markdown-it-py (ignores code blocks and examples)
Table Selection: Use --table N to extract from a specific table (required when multiple tables exist)
Format Detection: Recognize common formats (benchmarks as rows, columns, or comparison tables with multiple models)
Column Matching: Automatically identify model columns/rows; prefer --model-column-index (index from inspect output). Use --model-name-override only with exact column header text.
YAML Generation: Convert selected table to model-index YAML format
Task Typing: --task-type sets the task.type field in model-index output (e.g., text-generation, summarization)
Imported: 2. Import from Artificial Analysis
API Integration: Fetch benchmark scores directly from Artificial Analysis
Automatic Formatting: Convert API responses to model-index format
Metadata Preservation: Maintain source attribution and URLs
PR Creation: Automatically create pull requests with evaluation updates
Imported: 4. Run Evaluations on HF Jobs (Inference Providers)
Inspect-AI Integration: Run standard evaluations using the inspect-ai library
UV Integration: Seamlessly run Python scripts with ephemeral dependencies on HF infrastructure
Zero-Config: No Dockerfiles or Space management required
Hardware Selection: Configure CPU or GPU hardware for the evaluation job
Secure Execution: Handles API tokens safely via secrets passed through the CLI
Imported: 5. Run Custom Model Evaluations with vLLM (NEW)
⚠️ Important: This approach is only possible on devices with uv installed and sufficient GPU memory.
Benefits: No need to use hf_jobs() MCP tool, can run scripts directly in terminal
When to use: User working in local device directly when GPU is available
Before running the script
check the script path
check uv is installed
check gpu is available with nvidia-smi
Running the script
uv run scripts/train_sft_example.py
Features
vLLM Backend: High-performance GPU inference (5-10x faster than standard HF methods)
lighteval Framework: HuggingFace's evaluation library with Open LLM Leaderboard tasks
inspect-ai Framework: UK AI Safety Institute's evaluation library
Standalone or Jobs: Run locally or submit to HF Jobs infrastructure
Usage Instructions
The skill includes Python scripts in scripts/ to perform operations.
Prerequisites
Preferred: use uv run (PEP 723 header auto-installs deps)
Or install manually: pip install huggingface-hub markdown-it-py python-dotenv pyyaml requests
Set HF_TOKEN environment variable with Write-access token
For Artificial Analysis: Set AA_API_KEY environment variable
.env is loaded automatically if python-dotenv is installed
Method 1: Extract from README (CLI workflow)
Recommended flow (matches --help):
# 1) Inspect tables to get table numbers and column hints
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py inspect-tables --repo-id "username/model"# 2) Extract a specific table (prints YAML by default)
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py extract-readme \
--repo-id "username/model" \
--table 1 \
[--model-column-index <column index shown by inspect-tables>] \
[--model-name-override "<column header/model name>"] # use exact header text if you can't use the index# 3) Apply changes (push or PR)
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py extract-readme \
--repo-id "username/model" \
--table 1 \
--apply # push directly# or
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py extract-readme \
--repo-id "username/model" \
--table 1 \
--create-pr # open a PR
Validation checklist:
YAML is printed by default; compare against the README table before applying.
Prefer --model-column-index; if using --model-name-override, the column header text must be exact.
For transposed tables (models as rows), ensure only one row is extracted.
Method 2: Import from Artificial Analysis
Fetch benchmark scores from Artificial Analysis API and add them to a model card.
Evaluate custom HuggingFace models directly on GPU using vLLM or accelerate backends. These scripts are separate from inference provider scripts and run models locally on the job's hardware.
When to Use vLLM Evaluation (vs Inference Providers)
Feature
vLLM Scripts
Inference Provider Scripts
Model access
Any HF model
Models with API endpoints
Hardware
Your GPU (or HF Jobs GPU)
Provider's infrastructure
Cost
HF Jobs compute cost
API usage fees
Speed
vLLM optimized
Depends on provider
Offline
Yes (after download)
No
Option A: lighteval with vLLM Backend
lighteval is HuggingFace's evaluation library, supporting Open LLM Leaderboard tasks.
Standalone (local GPU):
# Run MMLU 5-shot with vLLM
uv run scripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.py \
--model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B \
--tasks "leaderboard|mmlu|5"# Run multiple tasks
uv run scripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.py \
--model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B \
--tasks "leaderboard|mmlu|5,leaderboard|gsm8k|5"# Use accelerate backend instead of vLLM
uv run scripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.py \
--model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B \
--tasks "leaderboard|mmlu|5" \
--backend accelerate
# Chat/instruction-tuned models
uv run scripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.py \
--model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct \
--tasks "leaderboard|mmlu|5" \
--use-chat-template
Via HF Jobs:
hf jobs uv run scripts/lighteval_vllm_uv.py \
--flavor a10g-small \
--secrets HF_TOKEN=$HF_TOKEN \
-- --model meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B \
--tasks "leaderboard|mmlu|5"
lighteval Task Format:
Tasks use the format suite|task|num_fewshot:
leaderboard|mmlu|5 - MMLU with 5-shot
leaderboard|gsm8k|5 - GSM8K with 5-shot
lighteval|hellaswag|0 - HellaSwag zero-shot
leaderboard|arc_challenge|25 - ARC-Challenge with 25-shot
This file contains all supported tasks in the format suite|task|num_fewshot|0 (the trailing 0 is a version flag and can be ignored). Common suites include:
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py show --repo-id "username/model-name"
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py validate --repo-id "username/model-name"
Check Open PRs (ALWAYS run before --create-pr):
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py get-prs --repo-id "username/model-name"
Lists all open pull requests for the model repository. Shows PR number, title, author, date, and URL.
Run Evaluation Job (Inference Providers):
hf jobs uv run scripts/inspect_eval_uv.py \
--flavor "cpu-basic|t4-small|..." \
--secret HF_TOKEN=$HF_TOKEN \
-- --model "model-id" \
--task "task-name"
Only extracts if tokens match exactly (handles different word orders and separators)
Fails if no exact match found (rather than guessing from similar names)
For column-based tables (benchmarks as rows, models as columns):
Finds the column header matching the model name
Extracts scores from that column only
For transposed tables (models as rows, benchmarks as columns):
Finds the row in the first column matching the model name
Extracts all benchmark scores from that row only
This ensures only the correct model's scores are extracted, never unrelated models or training checkpoints.
Common Patterns
Update Your Own Model:
# Extract from README and push directly
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py extract-readme \
--repo-id "your-username/your-model" \
--task-type "text-generation"
Update Someone Else's Model (Full Workflow):
# Step 1: ALWAYS check for existing PRs first
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py get-prs \
--repo-id "other-username/their-model"# Step 2: If NO open PRs exist, proceed with creating one
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py extract-readme \
--repo-id "other-username/their-model" \
--create-pr
# If open PRs DO exist:# - Warn the user about existing PRs# - Show them the PR URLs# - Do NOT create a new PR unless user explicitly confirms
Import Fresh Benchmarks:
# Step 1: Check for existing PRs
uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py get-prs \
--repo-id "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4"# Step 2: If no PRs, import from Artificial Analysis
AA_API_KEY=... uv run scripts/evaluation_manager.py import-aa \
--creator-slug "anthropic" \
--model-name "claude-sonnet-4" \
--repo-id "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4" \
--create-pr
Troubleshooting
Issue: "No evaluation tables found in README"
Solution: Check if README contains markdown tables with numeric scores
Issue: "Could not find model 'X' in transposed table"
Solution: The script will display available models. Use --model-name-override with the exact name from the list
Example: --model-name-override "**Olmo 3-32B**"
Issue: "AA_API_KEY not set"
Solution: Set environment variable or add to .env file
Issue: "Token does not have write access"
Solution: Ensure HF_TOKEN has write permissions for the repository
Issue: "Model not found in Artificial Analysis"
Solution: Verify creator-slug and model-name match API values
Issue: "Payment required for hardware"
Solution: Add a payment method to your Hugging Face account to use non-CPU hardware
Issue: "vLLM out of memory" or CUDA OOM
Solution: Use a larger hardware flavor, reduce --gpu-memory-utilization, or use --tensor-parallel-size for multi-GPU
Issue: "Model architecture not supported by vLLM"
Solution: Use --backend hf (inspect-ai) or --backend accelerate (lighteval) for HuggingFace Transformers
Issue: "Trust remote code required"
Solution: Add --trust-remote-code flag for models with custom code (e.g., Phi-2, Qwen)
Issue: "Chat template not found"
Solution: Only use --use-chat-template for instruction-tuned models that include a chat template
Integration Examples
Python Script Integration:
import subprocess
import os
defupdate_model_evaluations(repo_id, readme_content):
"""Update model card with evaluations from README."""
result = subprocess.run([
"python", "scripts/evaluation_manager.py",
"extract-readme",
"--repo-id", repo_id,
"--create-pr"
], capture_output=True, text=True)
if result.returncode == 0:
print(f"Successfully updated {repo_id}")
else:
print(f"Error: {result.stderr}")
Imported: Limitations
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
