update-otel-genai-conventions

name	update-otel-genai-conventions
description	Analyze OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic-conventions changes (PRs, CHANGELOG snapshots, date ranges, or releases when they exist) and produce compensating change plans for dotnet/extensions. The conventions now live in their own repo at open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai and cover gen-ai, mcp, openai, anthropic, aws-bedrock, and azure-ai-inference areas; the previous home was open-telemetry/semantic-conventions under the area:gen-ai label. Use when asked to "update OTel conventions", "check semantic-conventions-genai", "plan gen-ai convention changes", "bump genai semconv version", review gen-ai/MCP/provider convention PRs, or when given a PR number/URL, CHANGELOG snapshot, date range, or release version from either repo. Also use for "update OpenTelemetry", "bump semconv version", or "what changed in semantic-conventions-genai".
agent	agent
tools	["github/*","sql"]

Update OTel GenAI Conventions

Analyze OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic-conventions changes — PRs, changelog snapshots, date ranges, or releases — primarily from open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai, and produce compensating updates in dotnet/extensions. See the Migration Note below for context, including where these conventions were previously managed.

Migration Note

The OpenTelemetry GenAI semantic conventions are maintained in a dedicated repo: open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai, which also hosts mcp, openai, anthropic, aws-bedrock, and azure-ai-inference conventions. They were previously managed in the consolidated open-telemetry/semantic-conventions repo under the area:gen-ai label.

Implications for this skill:

• Primary input source is semantic-conventions-genai. The consolidated semantic-conventions repo remains a fallback for catch-up audits, historical context, and any in-flight PR that started there previously.
• Every PR is in scope for consideration, because semantic-conventions-genai is specific to GenAI conventions. (In the consolidated semantic-conventions repo the area:gen-ai label scoped this work, and it still applies there for catch-up.) The repo does use more granular area:* labels (for example area:mcp, area:inference, area:tools, area:embeddings), which can help triage but are not required for scoping.
• No releases yet in semantic-conventions-genai. The repo manages its changelog with Towncrier: the CHANGELOG.md Unreleased section is intentionally empty (fragments are compiled into it only at release time), so the live "what's new" view is the set of news fragments under changelog.d/, each named <upstream-PR>.<type>.md (types include enhancement, bugfix, breaking, clarification). Pin a snapshot via commit SHA / ref for reproducible audits.
• Release tagging is not proven yet. Until the repo ships real GenAI releases, treat GitHub Releases plus the release tag's dereferenced commit as the workflow baseline, but actively compare it with other durable signals (CHANGELOG release headers, schema URLs, and observed tag naming). Report confidence in the approach used, and surface a PR-body caution if another release signal becomes clearly more dependable than the workflow baseline.
• GenAI version is now independent of core semconv: it tracks its own version line. The schema URL https://opentelemetry.io/schemas/gen-ai/X.Y.Z is intended to carry the gen-ai version, but is not published yet (the repo's README.md ## Schema URL section is TODO). The repo's versions.env holds only the core semconv dependency (SEMCONV_VERSION, currently v1.42.0) and the Weaver toolchain version — it does not carry the GenAI convention version, so do not treat as the GenAI version. Until a GenAI release or schema URL exists, there is no published GenAI version number; identify the update by its fragment snapshot, pinned to a commit SHA / ref / date.

When a referenced PR number doesn't resolve in semantic-conventions-genai, check the consolidated semantic-conventions repo before assuming the input is invalid.

Cross-repo applicability

This skill lives in dotnet/extensions and its file paths, build commands, and PR-description conventions are tuned for that repo. The semantic-conventions-genai repo also hosts provider-specific areas (anthropic, aws-bedrock) whose dotnet instrumentation lives in other SDK repositories that we contribute to:

Upstream area	Repository	Notes
anthropic	anthropics/anthropic-sdk-csharp	Anthropic's official .NET SDK.
aws-bedrock	aws/aws-sdk-net	AWS Bedrock instrumentation lives in the BedrockRuntime service library (AWSSDK.BedrockRuntime) inside the AWS SDK monorepo.

The skill can optionally be applied in those repos with the following adaptations:

• Apply the convention analysis, classification framework (references/change-classification.md), audit-table shape, area routing, doc-comment wording target ("GenAI Semantic Conventions vX.Y.Z"), version-reference grep recipes, and PR-description shape (references/pr-description.md).
• Do not assume dotnet/extensions-specific paths (src/Libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.AI*/), the OpenTelemetryConsts.cs constants layout, the API-baseline workflow, or the build/test commands in references/build-commands.md. Use the target repo's own conventions for code structure, constants organization, and validation.
• Scope by repo: when running in another repo, the in-scope upstream area is the one that repo instruments (e.g. anthropic in anthropics/anthropic-sdk-csharp, aws-bedrock in the BedrockRuntime library of aws/aws-sdk-net). Other areas are out of scope from that repo's perspective even though they remain in scope for dotnet/extensions.
• Pre-flight still applies — search open PRs in the target repo for prior coverage before producing a plan.

Mode Detection

Determine the operating mode from the user's request:

Signal	Mode
User asks to "audit" current implementation or "check alignment" with conventions	Mode 1: Audit
User asks to "update for vX.Y" or "apply vX.Y changes" in autopilot / one-shot	Mode 2: Autopilot
User asks to "generate a prompt" or "delegate to Copilot" or "CCA prompt"	Mode 3: CCA Prompt
Running inside Copilot Coding Agent with a prompt referencing this skill	Mode 4: CCA Implementation
User is in /plan mode, asks to "plan" changes, or asks to "implement" / "apply" changes	Mode 5: Plan-then-Implement
User asks to /review or "review" convention changes	Mode 6: Review

If unclear, default to Mode 5 (Plan-then-Implement) and offer Mode 3 as an alternative.

Input Handling

semantic-conventions-genai does not yet publish releases. Until it does, the user typically provides one of:

• PR references in semantic-conventions-genai — full URL, #NNN, or open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai#NNN form. (No area: label filter is needed: the repo is gen-ai-focused by definition.)
• A changelog.d/ snapshot — a commit SHA, branch ref, or a https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai/tree/{ref}/changelog.d URL pinning the Towncrier news fragments at a point in time. (The CHANGELOG.md Unreleased section stays empty until release, so use the fragments — not CHANGELOG.md — for unreleased work.)
• A date range or "since last update" — list of PRs merged to semantic-conventions-genai's main between two refs / dates.
• A release version or release URL — once releases exist (https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai/releases/tag/{version}).

For catch-up or historical work, the consolidated semantic-conventions repo is still valid input:

• A semantic-conventions release version (e.g. v1.40.0) → fetch from https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/releases/tag/{version} (filter to area:gen-ai PRs).
• A release URL from semantic-conventions → fetch the release notes directly.
• PR references from semantic-conventions — only the ones with area:gen-ai. Use the open-telemetry/semantic-conventions#NNN form to disambiguate from semantic-conventions-genai PR numbers.

When PR numbers are given without a full URL, default to semantic-conventions-genai and fall back to the consolidated semantic-conventions repo only if the PR doesn't exist in semantic-conventions-genai or the user explicitly references it.

Release Tagging Signal Analysis

For every audit or implementation pass that creates or refreshes an upstream-scan tracking PR, include a concise release-tagging analysis. The current workflow baseline is:

1. Read GitHub's latest release for open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai.
2. Resolve that release's tag_name through refs/tags, dereferencing annotated tags to the commit they point at.
3. Treat the release as ready for a maintained PR only when that resolved commit equals the PR body's recorded upstream-scan-ref.

Compare that baseline with all durable release signals available at the scanned ref:

• GitHub Releases and the resolved release tag commit.
• CHANGELOG.md release headers produced by Towncrier.
• Published schema URLs such as opentelemetry.io/schemas/gen-ai/X.Y.Z, once they exist.
• Stable tag naming patterns, if the repo begins publishing tags without GitHub Releases.

Report confidence using these meanings:

• high: the signal is published and tied to an exact commit or schema version that matches the audited GenAI conventions.
• medium: the signal identifies a version, but the exact commit relationship is not proven.
• low: the signal is inferred from non-release data such as fragments, core semconv dependency versions, or naming guesses.
• none: no published GenAI release signal exists.

If a different release signal becomes clearly dependable and conflicts with the workflow baseline, keep the workflow behavior unchanged for that run, but add the PR-description > [!CAUTION] block described in references/pr-description.md. The block must name the signal found and recommend the specific skill and/or workflow change needed.

In-scope areas

The semantic-conventions-genai repo hosts conventions for several areas, all of which this skill covers (with placement guidance in references/implementation-patterns.md):

Upstream area	Maps to in dotnet/extensions
gen-ai, gen-ai/agent	Microsoft.Extensions.AI core (e.g. OpenTelemetryChatClient)
mcp	Currently no instrumentation; forward-looking — flag as a watch-list item if changes appear
openai	Microsoft.Extensions.AI.OpenAI
anthropic	Out of scope for dotnet/extensions today (no provider package). Implications land in anthropics/anthropic-sdk-csharp — apply this skill there per Cross-repo applicability.
aws-bedrock	Out of scope for dotnet/extensions today (no provider package). Implications land in the BedrockRuntime service library of aws/aws-sdk-net — apply this skill there per Cross-repo applicability.
azure-ai-inference	Corresponding provider package, if/when one exists in this repo; otherwise out of scope

When classifying a change, identify its area as follows. gen-ai, mcp, openai, and aws-bedrock each have a YAML registry under model/<area>/, so use that path. anthropic and azure-ai-inference do not have a model/ registry today; they are documented only as provider pages under docs/gen-ai/<provider>.md. All human-readable docs live under docs/gen-ai/ (for example docs/gen-ai/openai.md, docs/gen-ai/mcp.md, docs/gen-ai/anthropic.md), not under docs/<area>/.

Existing dotnet/extensions PR Preflight

For Mode 1: Audit and Mode 5: Plan-then-Implement, after resolving the requested input identifiers but before doing deeper analysis or creating a plan, search open pull requests in dotnet/extensions to determine whether another PR already appears to cover the requested update.

Search using the requested release version, CHANGELOG ref, date range, or upstream PR numbers, plus relevant terms such as gen-ai, GenAI, semantic conventions, semantic-conventions-genai, semconv-genai, OpenTelemetry, OTel, and any in-scope area name (MCP, OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock, Azure AI Inference) that matches the changes you're working from. If one or more likely matching PRs are open, report the PR number, title, author, URL, and the signal that matched. Then stop and state that the audit or plan is not proceeding because an open PR already appears to cover the update.

Do not silently ignore search failures. If GitHub search/listing is unavailable, report the problem and ask the user whether to proceed without the preflight.

A standing upstream-scan tracking PR (one carrying the # meai-otel-genai-worker:state:begin block) is the exception: it is the durable scan record, not a blocking duplicate. When the preflight surfaces it, continue rather than stopping -- the maintaining workflow owns how that PR is created and incremented.

Analyzing the Release / PRs

1. Fetch the release notes or PR descriptions and identify all gen-ai changes
2. Read references/file-inventory.md to understand which files in this repo are affected
3. Classify each change using references/change-classification.md
4. Check current state — read the current source files to determine what is already implemented vs. what needs new work
5. Build a changes audit table showing each semantic convention change, its classification, and required action

For Step 4, read the source files listed in references/file-inventory.md (OpenTelemetryConsts.cs, OpenTelemetryChatClient.cs, OpenTelemetryEmbeddingGenerator.cs, Common/FunctionInvocationProcessor.cs, and any other OpenTelemetry* files).

PR Title and Description Guidance

When creating or updating a PR after implementing GenAI semantic-conventions changes (from either repo), follow references/pr-description.md for the title format and the changes-table shape. For a recurring upstream-scan tracking PR (the kind carrying the # meai-otel-genai-worker:state:begin block), that reference also defines the full body template -- the implemented-changes table, the merged and in-flight applicability tables, and, at the very bottom, the machine-readable tracking state block (the body ends there).

---

Mode 1: Audit

Audit the current gen-ai semantic conventions implementation against the latest published conventions to identify gaps, inconsistencies, or missed updates. Produces a plan that can be implemented locally (Mode 5) or delegated to CCA (Mode 3).

1. Complete the Existing dotnet/extensions PR Preflight above. If a matching open PR exists, report it and stop.

2. Determine the current implemented version: Read the version reference from OpenTelemetryChatClient.cs doc comment to identify which convention version the codebase claims to implement

3. Check for version drift: Verify every file with a gen-ai semantic conventions version reference uses the same version. Use the search command from references/file-inventory.md. If files reference different versions, flag that as a critical gap requiring investigation.

4. Fetch the latest convention spec: Read the current conventions from the source of truth in open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai: docs/gen-ai/ for human-readable docs (for example docs/gen-ai/gen-ai-spans.md, docs/gen-ai/openai.md) and model/<area>/ for the YAML registry (gen-ai, mcp, openai, aws-bedrock). Note the published page at https://opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/gen-ai/ is currently a "Moved" stub and no longer renders the spec. There is no schema-snapshot/ directory, and the schema URL (opentelemetry.io/schemas/gen-ai/X.Y.Z) is not published yet (the repo README.md ## Schema URL section is TODO). The repo's versions.env holds only the core semconv dependency (SEMCONV_VERSION) and the Weaver version — not a GenAI version — so do not treat SEMCONV_VERSION as the GenAI version. Until a GenAI release or schema URL exists, there is no published GenAI version number; identify the update by its changelog.d/ fragment snapshot (commit SHA / ref / date). The GenAI convention version is independent of core semconv. Until releases exist in semantic-conventions-genai, use the latest changelog.d/ news fragments or recently merged PRs as the "latest release notes" equivalent.

   Also complete the Release Tagging Signal Analysis above so any PR description states release-signal confidence and warns when a different dependable release signal appears.

---

Implementation Procedure

Modes 2, 4, and 5 share the same implementation flow. See references/implementation-procedure.md.

---

Mode 2: Autopilot

One-shot mode that analyzes the upstream input (release, PRs, CHANGELOG snapshot, or date range) and implements all changes in a single pass without intermediate review. Best for end-to-end execution when the user does not need a plan checkpoint.

1. Complete the Input Handling analysis above
2. Build an internal work plan in working memory (do not write plan.md):
   • Changes audit table with classification for each gen-ai change
   • Ordered list of implementation steps
3. Follow the Implementation Procedure above
4. Present a summary of all changes with the audit table showing what was implemented

---

Mode 3: Generate CCA Prompt

Generate a structured prompt suitable for delegating to Copilot Coding Agent on github.com.

1. Complete the Input Handling analysis above
2. Read references/prompt-template.md for the template structure
3. Generate the prompt following the template, filling in:
   • Background with links to the upstream input (release URL, CHANGELOG snapshot ref, date range, or PR URLs)
   • Changes audit table (with Area column)
   • Required changes with exact file paths and code context from the current source
   • Test expectations referencing references/testing-guide.md
   • Validation steps
4. Present the prompt to the user for review

The generated prompt should reference this skill:

Reference the update-otel-genai-conventions skill in .github/skills/ for implementation patterns and testing guidance.

---

Mode 4: CCA Implementation

When running inside Copilot Coding Agent (github.com) with a prompt that references this skill.

1. Parse the prompt to identify the required changes
2. Follow the Implementation Procedure above

---

Mode 5: Plan-then-Implement

Generate a plan and (after user review/approval) implement it. Best when the user wants a checkpoint between analysis and execution. The runtime decides how to track work items (e.g., a task list, an in-memory queue, or a SQL todos table — whichever the agent already uses).

Phase A: Plan —

1. Resolve the user's input to one of: a release, PR identifiers, a changelog.d/ fragment snapshot (commit SHA / ref), or a date range in semantic-conventions-genai (open-telemetry/semantic-conventions-genai). For catch-up work, accept upstream PRs from the consolidated open-telemetry/semantic-conventions repo with area:gen-ai
2. Complete the Existing dotnet/extensions PR Preflight above. If a matching open PR exists, report it and stop without creating a plan.
3. Complete the Analyzing the Release / PRs analysis above
4. Create plan.md with a problem statement linking to the upstream input (release URL, CHANGELOG snapshot ref, date range, or list of PR URLs — whichever applies), a changes audit table, and a numbered list of work items. Each work item should call out the file(s) to modify, what code/constants/attributes to add, and which tests to update.
5. Pause for user review/approval before proceeding to Phase B

Phase B: Implement —

6. Read the existing plan.md
7. Follow the Implementation Procedure above for each work item

---

Mode 6: Review

Review changes to gen-ai conventions against past patterns and known gotchas.

1. Identify the changes to review (local diff or PR diff)
2. Read references/review-checklist.md for the full checklist
3. Read references/historical-releases.md for past PR patterns. This file is point-in-time reference data from skill creation and may not include recent releases.
4. Check each item against the checklist:
   • Sensitive data gating (EnableSensitiveData)
   • Fluent Activity API chain style
   • Code deduplication (shared Common/ classes)
   • Test augmentation vs. new tests
   • Version reference completeness
   • Exception recording approach (ILogger vs Activity.AddEvent)
5. Report findings with references to past PRs where similar feedback was given
6. Verify this skill is still accurate: Compare SKILL.md and all reference files against the current codebase (the codebase may have evolved — files moved, patterns changed). Recommend updates only for durable, cross-release guidance: workflow steps, validation commands, repository conventions, stable implementation patterns, file paths, test infrastructure. Do not pollute skill files with release-specific findings (per-version audits, one-off attribute mappings, etc.) — capture those in the review report, PR description, or implementation summary instead. Update historical-releases.md only when explicitly asked.

---

Gotchas

Critical knowledge from past PR reviews that should inform all modes:

• Exception recording: Use ILogger with [LoggerMessage], NOT Activity.AddEvent. The OTel SDK handles Exception passed to ILogger. See OpenTelemetryLog.cs in Common/.
• Sensitive data: Attributes that could contain user data (e.g. exception.message, message content) must be gated behind EnableSensitiveData. When in doubt, gate it.
• Fluent chains: Use fluent Activity API chains (.SetStatus(...).SetTag(...)) rather than separate statements.
• Shared code: Cross-cutting concerns (like exception logging) shared across multiple OpenTelemetry* clients belong in src/Libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.AI/Common/. Before adding a new helper, method, or internal type, search Common/, TelemetryHelpers.cs, OpenTelemetryLog.cs, and sibling OpenTelemetry* clients for existing logic with the same purpose — reuse or extend instead of introducing a parallel implementation. When the same helper is needed in 2+ places, factor it into Common/ from the start. The same applies to parallel internal types: if a sibling client already defines a type with the same shape (same properties, same role, e.g. RealtimeOtelFunction vs OtelFunction), unify them under a single shared definition rather than letting each client carry its own copy.
• Test augmentation: Prefer augmenting existing test assertions over creating new test methods. Check for existing tests that validate the same scenario.
• Version references: When bumping the convention version, update all files that match the transitional regex grep -rEn "Semantic Conventions for Generative AI systems v|GenAI Semantic Conventions v" src/Libraries/Microsoft.Extensions.AI/ (handles both pre- and post-migration wording). The next convention update should also migrate the wording in lockstep — see references/file-inventory.md §Version References. Not all OpenTelemetry* files contain this reference — only update the ones that do.
• No CHANGELOGs: This repository no longer maintains per-library CHANGELOG.md files. Do NOT create or update any CHANGELOG files.
• Source-generated JSON: Adding new OTel part types requires: (1) new inner class, (2) [JsonSerializable] registration on , (3) switch case in .

Validation

After implementing changes (Modes 2, 4, and 5):

1. Restore, build, and test using the commands in references/build-commands.md — pick the form (Windows or Linux/macOS) that matches your environment. Always remove any stale SDK.sln* files first; they cause build errors when present alongside a newly-generated filtered solution.
2. Verify no new build warnings in artifacts/log/Build.binlog
3. If the public API surface changed, regenerate the API baselines per references/build-commands.md — then discard baseline updates for unrelated libraries (only keep baselines for libraries changed as part of the convention update)