Skip to main content

openspec-onboard

Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
Draculabo/AntigravityManager
Letzte Quellaktivität
19. Februar 2026 um 11:37
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
2.231
Forks
273

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
openspec-onboard
description
Guided onboarding for OpenSpec - walk through a complete workflow cycle with narration and real codebase work.
license
MIT
compatibility
Requires openspec CLI.
metadata
{"author":"openspec","version":"1.0","generatedBy":"1.1.1"}
Guide the user through their first complete OpenSpec workflow cycle. This is a teaching experience—you'll do real work in their codebase while explaining each step. --- ## Preflight Before starting, check if OpenSpec is initialized: ```bash openspec status --json 2>&1 || echo "NOT_INITIALIZED" ``` **If not initialized:** > OpenSpec isn't set up in this project yet. Run `openspec init` first, then come back to `/opsx:onboard`. Stop here if not initialized. --- ## Phase 1: Welcome Display: ``` ## Welcome to OpenSpec! I'll walk you through a complete change cycle—from idea to implementation—using a real task in your codebase. Along the way, you'll learn the workflow by doing it. **What we'll do:** 1. Pick a small, real task in your codebase 2. Explore the problem briefly 3. Create a change (the container for our work) 4. Build the artifacts: proposal → specs → design → tasks 5. Implement the tasks 6. Archive the completed change **Time:** ~15-20 minutes Let's start by finding something to work on. ``` --- ## Phase 2: Task Selection ### Codebase Analysis Scan the codebase for small improvement opportunities. Look for: 1. **TODO/FIXME comments** - Search for `TODO`, `FIXME`, `HACK`, `XXX` in code files 2. **Missing error handling** - `catch` blocks that swallow errors, risky operations without try-catch 3. **Functions without tests** - Cross-reference `src/` with test directories 4. **Type issues** - `any` types in TypeScript files (`: any`, `as any`) 5. **Debug artifacts** - `console.log`, `console.debug`, `debugger` statements in non-debug code 6. **Missing validation** - User input handlers without validation Also check recent git activity: ```bash git log --oneline -10 2>/dev/null || echo "No git history" ``` ### Present Suggestions From your analysis, present 3-4 specific suggestions: ``` ## Task Suggestions Based on scanning your codebase, here are some good starter tasks: **1. [Most promising task]** Location: `src/path/to/file.ts:42` Scope: ~1-2 files, ~20-30 lines Why it's good: [brief reason] **2. [Second task]** Location: `src/another/file.ts` Scope: ~1 file, ~15 lines Why it's good: [brief reason] **3. [Third task]** Location: [location] Scope: [estimate] Why it's good: [brief reason] **4. Something else?** Tell me what you'd like to work on. Which task interests you? (Pick a number or describe your own) ``` **If nothing found:** Fall back to asking what the user wants to build: > I didn't find obvious quick wins in your codebase. What's something small you've been meaning to add or fix? ### Scope Guardrail If the user picks or describes something too large (major feature, multi-day work): ``` That's a valuable task, but it's probably larger than ideal for your first OpenSpec run-through. For learning the workflow, smaller is better—it lets you see the full cycle without getting stuck in implementation details. **Options:** 1. **Slice it smaller** - What's the smallest useful piece of [their task]? Maybe just [specific slice]? 2. **Pick something else** - One of the other suggestions, or a different small task? 3. **Do it anyway** - If you really want to tackle this, we can. Just know it'll take longer. What would you prefer? ``` Let the user override if they insist—this is a soft guardrail. --- ## Phase 3: Explore Demo Once a task is selected, briefly demonstrate explore mode: ``` Before we create a change, let me quickly show you **explore mode**—it's how you think through problems before committing to a direction. ``` Spend 1-2 minutes investigating the relevant code: - Read the file(s) involved - Draw a quick ASCII diagram if it helps - Note any considerations ``` ## Quick Exploration [Your brief analysis—what you found, any considerations] ┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ [Optional: ASCII diagram if helpful] │ └─────────────────────────────────────────┘ Explore mode (`/opsx:explore`) is for this kind of thinking—investigating before implementing. You can use it anytime you need to think through a problem. Now let's create a change to hold our work. ``` **PAUSE** - Wait for user acknowledgment before proceeding. --- ## Phase 4: Create the Change **EXPLAIN:** ``` ## Creating a Change A "change" in OpenSpec is a container for all the thinking and planning around a piece of work. It lives in `openspec/changes/<name>/` and holds your artifacts—proposal, specs, design, tasks. Let me create one for our task. ``` **DO:** Create the change with a derived kebab-case name: ```bash openspec new change "<derived-name>" ``` **SHOW:** ``` Created: `openspec/changes/<name>/` The folder structure: ``` openspec/changes/<name>/ ├── proposal.md ← Why we're doing this (empty, we'll fill it) ├── design.md ← How we'll build it (empty) ├── specs/ ← Detailed requirements (empty) └── tasks.md ← Implementation checklist (empty) ``` Now let's fill in the first artifact—the proposal. ``` --- ## Phase 5: Proposal **EXPLAIN:** ``` ## The Proposal The proposal captures **why** we're making this change and **what** it involves at a high level. It's the "elevator pitch" for the work. I'll draft one based on our task. ``` **DO:** Draft the proposal content (don't save yet): ``` Here's a draft proposal: --- ## Why [1-2 sentences explaining the problem/opportunity] ## What Changes [Bullet points of what will be different] ## Capabilities ### New Capabilities - `<capability-name>`: [brief description] ### Modified Capabilities <!-- If modifying existing behavior --> ## Impact - `src/path/to/file.ts`: [what changes] - [other files if applicable] --- Does this capture the intent? I can adjust before we save it. ``` **PAUSE** - Wait for user approval/feedback. After approval, save the proposal: ```bash openspec instructions proposal --change "<name>" --json ``` Then write the content to `openspec/changes/<name>/proposal.md`. ``` Proposal saved. This is your "why" document—you can always come back and refine it as understanding evolves. Next up: specs. ``` --- ## Phase 6: Specs **EXPLAIN:** ``` ## Specs Specs define **what** we're building in precise, testable terms. They use a requirement/scenario format that makes expected behavior crystal clear. For a small task like this, we might only need one spec file. ``` **DO:** Create the spec file: ```bash mkdir -p openspec/changes/<name>/specs/<capability-name> ``` Draft the spec content: ``` Here's the spec: --- ## ADDED Requirements ### Requirement: <Name> <Description of what the system should do> #### Scenario: <Scenario name> - **WHEN** <trigger condition> - **THEN** <expected outcome> - **AND** <additional outcome if needed> --- This format—WHEN/THEN/AND—makes requirements testable. You can literally read them as test cases. ``` Save to `openspec/changes/<name>/specs/<capability>/spec.md`. --- ## Phase 7: Design **EXPLAIN:** ``` ## Design The design captures **how** we'll build it—technical decisions, tradeoffs, approach. For small changes, this might be brief. That's fine—not every change needs deep design discussion. ``` **DO:** Draft design.md: ``` Here's the design: --- ## Context [Brief context about the current state] ## Goals / Non-Goals **Goals:** - [What we're trying to achieve] **Non-Goals:** - [What's explicitly out of scope] ## Decisions ### Decision 1: [Key decision] [Explanation of approach and rationale] --- For a small task, this captures the key decisions without over-engineering. ``` Save to `openspec/changes/<name>/design.md`. --- ## Phase 8: Tasks **EXPLAIN:** ``` ## Tasks Finally, we break the work into implementation tasks—checkboxes that drive the apply phase. These should be small, clear, and in logical order. ``` **DO:** Generate tasks based on specs and design: ``` Here are the implementation tasks: --- ## 1. [Category or file] - [ ] 1.1 [Specific task] - [ ] 1.2 [Specific task] ## 2. Verify - [ ] 2.1 [Verification step] --- Each checkbox becomes a unit of work in the apply phase. Ready to implement? ``` **PAUSE** - Wait for user to confirm they're ready to implement. Save to `openspec/changes/<name>/tasks.md`. --- ## Phase 9: Apply (Implementation) **EXPLAIN:** ``` ## Implementation Now we implement each task, checking them off as we go. I'll announce each one and occasionally note how the specs/design informed the approach. ``` **DO:** For each task: 1. Announce: "Working on task N: [description]" 2. Implement the change in the codebase 3. Reference specs/design naturally: "The spec says X, so I'm doing Y" 4. Mark complete in tasks.md: `- [ ]` → `- [x]` 5. Brief status: "✓ Task N complete" Keep narration light—don't over-explain every line of code. After all tasks: ``` ## Implementation Complete All tasks done: - [x] Task 1 - [x] Task 2 - [x] ... The change is implemented! One more step—let's archive it. ``` --- ## Phase 10: Archive **EXPLAIN:** ``` ## Archiving When a change is complete, we archive it. This moves it from `openspec/changes/` to `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/`. Archived changes become your project's decision history—you can always find them later to understand why something was built a certain way. ``` **DO:** ```bash openspec archive "<name>" ``` **SHOW:** ``` Archived to: `openspec/changes/archive/YYYY-MM-DD-<name>/` The change is now part of your project's history. The code is in your codebase, the decision record is preserved. ``` --- ## Phase 11: Recap & Next Steps ``` ## Congratulations! You just completed a full OpenSpec cycle: 1. **Explore** - Thought through the problem 2. **New** - Created a change container 3. **Proposal** - Captured WHY 4. **Specs** - Defined WHAT in detail 5. **Design** - Decided HOW 6. **Tasks** - Broke it into steps 7. **Apply** - Implemented the work 8. **Archive** - Preserved the record This same rhythm works for any size change—a small fix or a major feature. --- ## Command Reference | Command | What it does | |---------|--------------| | `/opsx:explore` | Think through problems before/during work | | `/opsx:new` | Start a new change, step through artifacts | | `/opsx:ff` | Fast-forward: create all artifacts at once | | `/opsx:continue` | Continue working on an existing change | | `/opsx:apply` | Implement tasks from a change | | `/opsx:verify` | Verify implementation matches artifacts | | `/opsx:archive` | Archive a completed change | --- ## What's Next? Try `/opsx:new` or `/opsx:ff` on something you actually want to build. You've got the rhythm now! ``` --- ## Graceful Exit Handling ### User wants to stop mid-way If the user says they need to stop, want to pause, or seem disengaged: ``` No problem! Your change is saved at `openspec/changes/<name>/`. To pick up where we left off later: - `/opsx:continue <name>` - Resume artifact creation - `/opsx:apply <name>` - Jump to implementation (if tasks exist) The work won't be lost. Come back whenever you're ready. ``` Exit gracefully without pressure. ### User just wants command reference If the user says they just want to see the commands or skip the tutorial: ``` ## OpenSpec Quick Reference | Command | What it does | |---------|--------------| | `/opsx:explore` | Think through problems (no code changes) | | `/opsx:new <name>` | Start a new change, step by step | | `/opsx:ff <name>` | Fast-forward: all artifacts at once | | `/opsx:continue <name>` | Continue an existing change | | `/opsx:apply <name>` | Implement tasks | | `/opsx:verify <name>` | Verify implementation | | `/opsx:archive <name>` | Archive when done |
Auf GitHub ansehen
Diese SKILL.md ist sehr gross, daher zeigt SkillsMP hier nur den ersten Abschnitt. Auf GitHub ansehen