Skip to main content

accommodation-evaluator

Creates a structured comparison framework for evaluating hotels, hostels, vacation rentals, and other accommodation types. Produces a weighted scoring rubric with red-flag indicators and a side-by-side comparison table. Use when the user asks about choosing between accommodation options, evaluating rental listings, comparing hotel types, or creating accommodation selection criteria for a trip. Do NOT use for general trip planning (use trip-itinerary-builder), budget optimization (use budget-travel-planner), or booking strategy (use airfare-search-strategy for flights).

Quellinformationen

Repository
FerroxLabs/murage
Letzte Quellaktivität
7. Oktober 2026 um 18:05
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
10
Forks
2

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
accommodation-evaluator
description
Creates a structured comparison framework for evaluating hotels, hostels, vacation rentals, and other accommodation types. Produces a weighted scoring rubric with red-flag indicators and a side-by-side comparison table. Use when the user asks about choosing between accommodation options, evaluating rental listings, comparing hotel types, or creating accommodation selection criteria for a trip. Do NOT use for general trip planning (use trip-itinerary-builder), budget optimization (use budget-travel-planner), or booking strategy (use airfare-search-strategy for flights).
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
{"author":"Ferrox Labs","version":"1.0.0","tags":"travel research checklist analysis","category":"travel-experiences","subcategory":"trip-planning","depends":"","disclaimer":"none","difficulty":"beginner"}
# Accommodation Evaluator ## When to Use Use this skill when the user's primary need is **evaluating, comparing, or scoring specific accommodation options** against each other or against personal criteria. **Trigger scenarios:** - User has 2-4 specific listings in hand (hotel rooms, vacation rentals, hostels) and needs a structured comparison - User is deciding between accommodation types (e.g., "Should I book a hotel or apartment for this trip?") and needs pros/cons plus a scoring framework - User wants to know what questions to ask a host or hotel before booking, or what red flags to look for in a listing - User is evaluating a single vacation rental listing and wants to know if it's legitimate, fairly priced, and a good fit - User needs to calculate the true all-in cost of accommodations that advertise different fee structures (one shows $89/night, another shows $150/night with breakfast included) - User is choosing between accommodation tiers -- economy vs. mid-range vs. boutique -- and needs a value analysis framework - User needs criteria-based guidance for a specific trip type (family travel, remote work stay, accessibility requirements, large group) - User asks "Is this Airbnb price fair?" or "What should I look for in a hostel?" or "How do I know if this rental is a scam?" **Do NOT use when:** - User needs end-to-end trip planning (use `trip-itinerary-builder` -- that skill coordinates accommodation within the full itinerary context) - User's primary question is about budget allocation across the full trip, not accommodation evaluation (use `budget-travel-planner`) - User wants to know the best time to book or how far in advance to reserve (this skill evaluates options, not booking windows -- use booking strategy guidance separately) - User is searching for options and has no listings yet (this skill evaluates; it does not search or recommend specific properties) - User is evaluating a property for purchase or long-term lease as real estate (use personal finance or real estate skills) - User asks only about flight accommodation (connecting flight layovers with hotel stays -- use `airfare-search-strategy`) - User is asking about loyalty program strategy (points valuation, status matching, credit card benefits) -- that is a separate redemption optimization topic --- ## Process ### Step 1: Gather Accommodation Intelligence Before scoring anything, collect the variables that determine what "good" means for this specific trip. Do not assume defaults. - **Trip parameters:** Destination city and preferred neighborhood or district; exact dates (check-in and check-out); number of nights; number of guests broken down by adults, children (with ages), and infants - **Budget clarity:** Ask for budget as a per-night target AND a total-stay ceiling -- these often conflict once fees are added. Distinguish between "I want to spend $150/night" and "I cannot spend more than $1,200 total under any circumstances" - **Travel purpose:** Business travel, leisure, romantic trip, family vacation, extended remote work, group celebration, medical travel, backpacking. Purpose determines which criteria matter most - **Non-negotiables (deal-breakers):** These eliminate options before scoring begins. Common examples: must have air conditioning (critical in tropical destinations above 28°C/82°F), must allow pets, must be wheelchair accessible, must have a dedicated workspace with reliable internet (critical for remote workers), must have parking, must not require a car, ground floor only, private bathroom required - **Stated priorities:** Ask the user to rank these five dimensions in order: Location, Price/Value, Space, Amenities, and Flexibility. Their ranking directly determines scoring weights - **Existing options:** Get the specific listings or accommodation types the user is considering. If they have listing URLs or descriptions, analyze those; if they have only general types, help them define evaluation criteria before applying them ### Step 2: Set Weights Based on Stated Priorities Convert the user's priority ranking into a 1-5 weight scale. The highest-ranked priority gets weight 5; the lowest gets weight 1. Middle ranks get 2, 3, and 4 respectively. If two priorities are equal, assign the same weight. **The six evaluation dimensions and what each actually measures:** - **Location (weight 1-5):** Not just "is it central" but proximity to the specific things this trip requires. For a beach vacation, beachfront vs. 10-minute walk is the meaningful gradient. For business travel, proximity to the conference venue and airport transport matters. Assess: walkability score, transit access, neighborhood safety at night, noise level (avoid properties on major arterials, near nightlife districts, or under flight paths unless stated otherwise), and parking access if renting a car - **Price/Value (weight 1-5):** True cost per night after all fees, divided by what that cost delivers in quality and included services. A $200/night hotel with breakfast, daily housekeeping, pool, and gym is often better value than a $130/night apartment with a $90 cleaning fee, no included services, and self-catering costs - **Space/Layout (weight 1-5):** Total square footage matters less than usable layout. Evaluate: number of bedrooms relative to party size, number of bathrooms (critical for groups of 4+), presence of living room or common area separate from sleeping area, kitchen size and equipment level, outdoor space (balcony, terrace, garden), and storage space for luggage on longer stays - **Amenities (weight 1-5):** Score based on what the trip actually needs. A kitchen is high-value on a 10-night stay but nearly irrelevant on a 2-night city break. Amenities that change the trip's economics or daily experience: full kitchen (grocery vs. restaurant costs), laundry (critical for stays over 7 nights or with children), dedicated workspace with desk and monitor-level lighting, pool/fitness center, parking, cribs or child safety equipment, air conditioning or reliable heating - **Reviews/Reputation (weight 1-5):** Quality and pattern of reviews, not just the aggregate score. Hotel review ecosystems (TripAdvisor, Booking.com, Google) and vacation rental ecosystems (Airbnb, Vrbo) have different score calibrations -- a 4.3 on Booking.com is excellent; a 4.3 on Airbnb is a warning sign. Evaluate: total review count, review recency (last 6 months matters more than older reviews), consistency across platforms, how management responds to negative reviews, and whether reviews address the specific things you care about - **Flexibility (weight 1-5):** The financial risk profile of the booking. Free cancellation to 24-48 hours before is ideal. Moderate policies (free cancellation 7-14 days out) are acceptable. Strict policies (50% non-refundable immediately, no refund within 30 days) represent real financial risk, especially for trips more than 4 weeks out or for travelers with unpredictable schedules. Weight flexibility higher if: the trip is long in the future, the traveler has health or family unpredictability, or if travel insurance is not in place ### Step 3: Score Each Option on Every Dimension For each accommodation option, assign a raw score of 1-5 on each dimension: - **5 -- Exceeds needs:** Materially better than required. A family needing 2 bedrooms gets 3 bedrooms; beachfront property when beach proximity is the goal - **4 -- Meets needs comfortably:** Fits requirements with minor extras. Good location, no concerns - **3 -- Adequate:** Meets the minimum threshold. Acceptable but not impressive. A workspace that is technically a desk in the corner of the bedroom - **2 -- Below expectations:** A gap exists that will affect the experience. A 15-minute walk to the beach for a beach trip; a studio apartment for 4 adults - **1 -- Fails to meet needs:** A disqualifying problem in this dimension, though not necessarily a deal-breaker if the criterion is weighted low Calculate the weighted score for each dimension: raw score x weight. Sum all weighted scores for each option's total. Maximum possible score = sum of all weights x 5. Express as a fraction (e.g., 78/100) where the denominator is max possible score. ### Step 4: Run the Red-Flag Screening Protocol Apply this checklist independently for every option, regardless of how well it scored. A high-scoring option with red flags should trigger explicit caution in the recommendation. **Pricing red flags:** - Price more than 30-40% below comparable properties in the same neighborhood and date range -- most common scam indicator for rentals - Cleaning fee that exceeds 50% of one night's rate (e.g., $150 cleaning fee on a $100/night property for a 3-night stay) -- this is a fee-hiding practice - "Resort fee" or "facility fee" not disclosed in the listing headline price, discovered only at checkout -- common in Las Vegas, Miami, New York hotels; can add $30-60/night - Pricing that changes dramatically between the listing page and checkout without clear itemization **Listing quality red flags:** - Stock photos or images with metadata suggesting they are from a photo bank rather than the actual property - Fewer than 8-10 photos for a full apartment or house listing (a legitimate host has nothing to hide) - No photo of the bathroom, the beds, or the street/entrance - Listing description uses vague language like "cozy" (often means very small) or "close to everything" without specific distances - Property labeled "newly renovated" but photos show worn fixtures -- misrepresentation risk - Description mentions amenities (washer, dishwasher, AC) not visible in any photos **Review red flags:** - All reviews are 5 stars with generic text ("Great place! Would come back!" with no specifics) -- potential review manipulation - No reviews mentioning anything negative, even minor issues -- statistically improbable for any real property - Sudden cluster of positive reviews in a short window after a period of negative reviews -- possible review gaming - Reviews that mention the listing "not as described" or "smaller than expected" -- take this seriously; it indicates a persistent accuracy issue - Host never responds to negative reviews -- indicates low accountability - Review score below 4.0 on Airbnb or Vrbo (these platforms have score inflation; below 4.0 is genuinely poor) - Review score below 7.5 on Booking.com (different scale; 8.0+ is good, 7.5-8.0 is acceptable, below 7.5 is concerning) **Policy red flags:** - Payment requested outside the booking platform (wire transfer, Zelle, crypto) -- this is almost always a scam - Security deposit that seems disproportionate to the property value (e.g., $1,000 deposit on a $100/night studio) - Cancellation policy is "non-refundable" by default with no moderate option offered - Check-in requires an in-person key handoff with no backup procedure described -- creates stranded-traveler risk - No clear process for reporting maintenance issues or emergencies during the stay **Communication red flags:** - Host does not respond within 24 hours to a direct question -- a reliable host responds within 2-6 hours during waking hours - Evasive or scripted responses that don't actually answer specific questions - Host pressures you to book quickly ("someone else is interested") before you have your questions answered -- this is a classic scam tactic - Host asks you to communicate outside the platform after initial contact (email only, WhatsApp only) -- removes the booking platform's dispute resolution protections ### Step 5: Calculate True Cost The advertised nightly rate is never the total cost. Build a complete fee ledger for each option. **Fee components to calculate:** 1. **Base rate:** Advertised nightly rate x number of nights 2. **Cleaning fee:** One-time for vacation rentals; typically $50-200 for apartments; $150-400 for houses. Note that this fee does not scale with nights -- a $120 cleaning fee on a 2-night stay adds $60/night but only $17/night on a 7-night stay 3. **Service or platform fee:** Booking.com typically charges nothing to the guest (it's hotel-side); Airbnb charges guests 14-16% of the subtotal; Vrbo charges 6-12% guest fee. These are significant 4. **Resort or facility fee:** Hotels in tourist-heavy markets (Las Vegas, Miami, New York, Cancun, Hawaii) charge $25-65/night on top of the room rate. This is separate from the room rate and often not shown until checkout on OTA sites 5. **Parking:** Urban hotels commonly charge $25-60/night for parking in North America and Europe; this is often not included even at full-service hotels. Vacation rentals in suburban or rural areas often include free parking 6. **Tourist/city tax:** Many European cities (Amsterdam, Rome, Barcelona, Paris) and some US cities charge a per-person-per-night tax of €1-7 per person. For a family of 4 over 7 nights, this can add $56-200 7. **Additional guest fees:** Some vacation rentals charge per-person above a base occupancy (e.g., base rate for 2 guests, $15/night per additional guest). Check the listing's guest capacity carefully 8. **Kitchen savings (if applicable):** For stays of 5+ nights where a kitchen is available, estimate grocery spend vs. equivalent restaurant spend. A family of 4 eating out three meals/day in Europe can spend $150-200/day; cooking breakfast and lunch at home reduces this to $50-80/day in groceries. Over 7 nights, this is a $700-840 true savings that should offset a slightly higher rental rate 9. **Total true cost = sum of all above fees for the full stay** 10. **True cost per night = total true cost / number of nights** Always present the true cost per night alongside the advertised rate. The gap is often 20-50%. ### Step 6: Generate Recommendation and Booking Checklist The recommendation must directly address the user's stated priorities and the red-flag findings. Structure it as: - **Top choice with explicit reasoning:** Which option scores highest when weighted scores, true cost, and red-flag status are all considered together. Do not recommend a highest-scoring option that has an unresolved red flag without flagging the risk - **Conditions under which the runner-up would be better:** There is almost always a scenario (trip gets extended, budget tightens, flexibility becomes important) where the second option wins - **Avoidance recommendation if warranted:** If any option has a red flag that is serious enough to constitute a scam risk or high probability of misrepresentation, say so directly - **Booking checklist:** A specific set of pre-booking verification actions tailored to the accommodation type and the specific issues identified during evaluation. Not generic; each item should address a specific risk or uncertainty identified during the analysis --- ## Output Format ``` ## Accommodation Comparison **Destination:** [city and neighborhood/district] **Dates:** [check-in date] to [check-out date] ([N] nights) **Guests:** [number and breakdown: e.g., 2 adults, 2 children ages X and Y] **Budget target:** $[per night] / $[total stay ceiling] **Travel purpose:** [e.g., family beach vacation, remote work stay, business trip] **Top priority:** [stated #1 priority from user ranking] --- ### Evaluation Criteria (Weighted) | Criterion | Weight (1-5) | Reasoning | |-----------|-------------|-----------| | Location | [1-5] | [specific reason this trip needs this weight -- name the key location requirement] | | Price/Value | [1-5] | [specific reason based on budget tightness and included services] | | Space/Layout | [1-5] | [specific reason based on party size, trip length, travel purpose] | | Amenities | [1-5] | [name the specific amenities that matter: kitchen, workspace, laundry, etc.] | | Reviews | [1-5] | [why reliability matters or doesn't at this level for this trip] | | Flexibility | [1-5] | [specific risk factors: trip timing, cancellation risk, insurance status] | | **Max possible score** | [sum x 5] | | --- ### Side-by-Side Comparison | Criterion | Wt | [Option A: Type + Name/Description] | Raw | Wtd | [Option B: Type + Name/Description] | Raw | Wtd | [Option C: Type + Name/Description] | Raw | Wtd | |-----------|----|------------------------------------|-----|-----|-------------------------------------|-----|-----|-------------------------------------|-----|-----| | Location | [W] | [specific detail: distance to key destination, transit access, neighborhood] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [specific detail] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [specific detail] | [1-5] | [WxS] | | Price/Value | [W] | [advertised rate, what's included, value assessment] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | | Space/Layout | [W] | [sqm if known, bedroom count, bathroom count, key layout feature] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | | Amenities | [W] | [list the relevant amenities present and absent] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | | Reviews | [W] | [score, count, platform, key patterns in recent reviews] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | | Flexibility | [W] | [cancellation policy specifics: free cancel until when? Penalty after?] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | [same] | [1-5] | [WxS] | | **TOTAL** | [max] | | | **[sum/max]** | | | **[sum/max]** | | | **[sum/max]** | --- ### True Cost Analysis | Cost Component | [Option A] | [Option B] | [Option C] | |---------------|------------|------------|------------| | Advertised rate ([N] nights x $/night) | $[calc] | $[calc] | $[calc] | | Cleaning fee (one-time) | $[amt or N/A] | $[amt or N/A] | $[amt or N/A] | | Platform/service fee ([X]% of subtotal) | $[calc] | $[calc] | $[calc] | | Resort/facility fee ($X/night x N nights) | $[calc or N/A] | $[calc or N/A] | $[calc or N/A] | | Parking ($X/night x N nights) | $[calc or N/A] | $[calc or N/A] | $[calc or N/A] | | Tourist/city tax ($X/person/night x guests x nights) | $[calc] | $[calc] | $[calc] | | Additional guest fees (if applicable) | $[calc or N/A] | $[calc or N/A] | $[calc or N/A] | | Breakfast/meals offset (kitchen savings) | -$[savings or N/A] | -$[savings or N/A] | -$[savings or N/A] |
Auf GitHub ansehen
Diese SKILL.md ist sehr gross, daher zeigt SkillsMP hier nur den ersten Abschnitt. Auf GitHub ansehen