| name | build-connector |
| description | Build a new Fivetran connector from a description. Use when the user wants to create, generate, or scaffold a new connector for an API or data source. |
| argument-hint | Describe the connector (e.g., 'Stripe API connector for payments and customers') |
Context: This plugin is for the Fivetran Connector SDK (CSDK). "CSDK" is shorthand for "Connector SDK".
Build a New Fivetran Connector
FIRST: Read sdk-reference.md from the plugin directory to load SDK rules, patterns, and example URLs.
You are building a complete Fivetran connector from the user's description. This skill orchestrates the build; detailed per-phase logic lives in the plugin's workflow files.
Phase 0: Determine the Best Build Approach
Before doing any API research or code generation, check whether a simpler path exists. A custom CSDK connector means the user writes and maintains code; other paths may let Fivetran manage the connector for them. Always surface better options to the user before building custom.
Run all three checks in order and present findings to the user. The user decides — if they prefer to build custom even when a managed option exists, proceed to Phase 1.
Check 1: Is there already a native Fivetran connector for this source?
Read the bundled catalog file native-connectors.md in the plugin directory. Do a case-insensitive fuzzy match on the source name the user mentioned against the entries.
-
If you find a match or a very close match, tell the user:
"Fivetran already has a native {Match} connector (catalog). That's typically the best choice — Fivetran maintains it, handles API/schema changes, and you don't write or maintain any code. You can configure it in the Fivetran dashboard. Would you like to go that route? Or do you have a specific need (e.g., custom endpoint, unsupported object, non-standard auth) that requires a custom CSDK connector?"
Wait for the user's answer. If they choose the native connector, stop and direct them to the Fivetran dashboard. If they want custom CSDK anyway, usually skip Check 2 and go straight to Phase 1 (Lite rarely beats an existing native).
-
If there's no match, do NOT assert "no native connector exists." The bundled list may be out of date. Say:
"I don't see {Source} in the bundled Fivetran catalog list, but the list may be stale. Please quickly check https://fivetran.com/integrations to confirm. If it exists there, use the native connector. If not, I'll continue to Check 2."
Only proceed to Check 2 after the user confirms there's no native connector.
Check 2: Is this a good fit for a Lite Connector (AI builder)?
Lite Connectors are built with Fivetran's AI builder and managed by Fivetran — the customer doesn't write or maintain any code. Docs: https://fivetran.com/docs/connectors/applications/lite-connectors
Criteria for recommending Lite:
- Source is a SaaS application (not a database, file system, event stream, or in-house system)
- Exposes a REST API with JSON responses
- Uses standard authentication (API key, Bearer token, or OAuth 2)
- No complex stateful logic or heavy transformations needed
If the user's source fits these criteria, tell them:
"Based on what you described, {Source} looks like a good fit for a Fivetran Lite Connector. Lite Connectors are built with Fivetran's AI builder and are managed by Fivetran — you won't have to write or maintain any connector code. Fivetran handles API changes, bug fixes, and upgrades. Want to try the Lite path first? It's typically faster to set up and lower ongoing maintenance than a custom CSDK connector."
Wait for the user's answer. If they choose the Lite path, stop and direct them to the Lite Connector builder. If they want custom CSDK, continue to Phase 1.
Check 3: Proceed with custom CSDK
If neither Check 1 nor Check 2 produced a better option, or the user explicitly chose custom CSDK, continue to Phase 1.
Phase 1: Research & Validate Requirements
Apply the validator workflow — read workflows/validator.md in the plugin directory (or, in plugins that support subagents, invoke the connector-validator subagent) to research the API and produce a complete specification.
Stop and wait for the user to answer any clarifying questions the validator surfaces before proceeding to Phase 2.
Phase 2: Generate Connector Files
Apply the generator workflow — read workflows/generator.md (or invoke the connector-generator subagent) to study 2–4 relevant SDK examples and produce connector.py, configuration.json, and README.md.
Create the project directory before calling the workflow; name it after the connector (lowercase, underscores).
Phase 3: Setup Environment
Set up the connector environment with commands appropriate for the user's OS:
macOS/Linux:
cd "<project_directory>"
uv venv .venv
uv pip install --python .venv/bin/python -r requirements.txt fivetran_connector_sdk
Windows PowerShell:
cd "<project_directory>"
uv venv .venv
uv pip install --python .\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -r requirements.txt fivetran_connector_sdk
Phase 4: Enter Configuration & Test
After generating the files (or finding existing files with placeholder values), credentials must be entered via the encryption script. This is not negotiable and not a user choice — it is the only supported flow.
HARD RULES — violating any of these is a failure:
- DO NOT use
AskUserQuestion (or any choice-menu / multi-option UI) to ask how the user wants to enter credentials. There is exactly one way.
- DO NOT present "Paste in chat", "Edit the file yourself", "Use a public repo", or any other option as a credential-entry choice.
- DO NOT tell the user to edit
configuration.json manually under any circumstances.
- DO NOT accept credentials pasted in chat.
- DO NOT run
enter_configuration.py yourself. The user must run it in their own separate terminal.
- DO NOT proceed to running
run_connector.py until credentials are encrypted (the runner will refuse plaintext config anyway).
THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE FLOW. Output the following message to the user as plain text (substitute <plugin> with the actual plugin directory path, and <connector_dir> with the connector directory). Use one fenced command block: bash on macOS/Linux, powershell on Windows. Quote both paths. Do not insert a line break inside the python command.
I've generated the connector files (or the files already exist). To fill in credentials securely, open a separate terminal, then run:
```bash
cd "<connector_dir>"
python "<plugin>/tools/enter_configuration.py" "configuration.json"
```
The script will prompt you for each credential field and encrypt them in place. I never see the plaintext values. Let me know when it's done and I'll run the test.
If the local encryption secret file does not exist yet, the script creates it first.
After the user confirms credentials are entered, run the connector via the secure runner:
python <plugin>/tools/run_connector.py <connector_dir>
This decrypts the config in memory and passes it via named pipe — plaintext credentials never touch disk. If run_connector.py exits with "configuration.json is not encrypted", the user bypassed the encryption script; loop back to the directive above and do not retry the test until encryption is done.
Check results:
macOS/Linux:
.venv/bin/python -c "
import duckdb
conn = duckdb.connect('files/warehouse.db')
tables = conn.execute(\"SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = 'tester'\").fetchall()
print(f'Tables synced: {len(tables)}')
for (t,) in tables:
count = conn.execute(f'SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tester.{t}').fetchone()[0]
print(f' tester.{t}: {count} rows')"
Windows PowerShell:
.\.venv\Scripts\python.exe -c 'import duckdb; conn = duckdb.connect("files/warehouse.db"); tables = conn.execute("SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = ''tester''").fetchall(); print("Tables synced:", len(tables)); [print(" tester." + t + ": " + str(conn.execute("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tester." + t).fetchone()[0]) + " rows") for (t,) in tables]; conn.close()'
Report: tables synced, row counts, any errors.
Phase 5: Auto-Fix on Failure
If the test fails:
- Read the error output carefully.
- Classify the error:
- INFRA error (network, JVM, SDK internal): explain the infrastructure issue. Do NOT change code.
- FIRST_RUN error (connector has never succeeded — likely credentials/config): guide the user to verify config. Do NOT change code.
- CODE error (syntax, logic, SDK misuse): apply the fixer workflow — read
workflows/fixer.md (or invoke the connector-fixer subagent). Re-test after fixing.
- TOOL error (
run_connector.py fails): report to the user. Do NOT modify plugin tools.
IMPORTANT: Never modify plugin tools. Only fix the user's connector code.