Skip to main content

release-notes

When the user wants a human-readable changelog or release notes from shipped work. Use when he says "write release notes," "changelog," "what shipped," "summarize this branch/PR for release," or wants a plain-language summary of what changed for a project. Turns git history, a branch, or a set of PRs into notes that read like a product update, not a commit log.

Quellinformationen

Repository
gavin844/claude-code-skills
Letzte Quellaktivität
5. Oktober 2026 um 19:27
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
0
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
release-notes
description
When the user wants a human-readable changelog or release notes from shipped work. Use when he says "write release notes," "changelog," "what shipped," "summarize this branch/PR for release," or wants a plain-language summary of what changed for a project. Turns git history, a branch, or a set of PRs into notes that read like a product update, not a commit log.
metadata
{"version":"1.0.0"}
# Release Notes Turn shipped work into notes a non-engineer can read: what changed, why it matters, what to do about it. Works from a branch, a range of commits, or a set of merged PRs. ## When to use The user wants to know or communicate what shipped: a project update for himself, a note for a colleague or a client, or user-facing release notes. ## Inputs - The repo and the range: a branch vs main, "since last release," or specific PRs. - Read the diff and commit messages (git), and any linked Linear/Jira issues if connected, to recover the WHY behind each change, not just the what. ## How to build them 1. Group changes by theme, not by commit. A reader cares about features and fixes, not individual commits. 2. For each item, write one line in plain product language: the change and why it matters. Translate file/function names into features (the standing rule: features, not plumbing). 3. Separate into **New**, **Improved**, **Fixed**, and **Behind the scenes** (infra/refactor that has no user-facing effect but is worth noting). 4. Lead with what a person would notice. Bury the plumbing at the bottom or drop it. ## Output ``` ## <Project> - <date> **New** - <feature>: <what it does for the user> **Improved** - <change>: <the before/after in one line> **Fixed** - <bug>: <what was broken, now works> **Behind the scenes** - <infra/refactor>, if worth a mention ``` ## Rules - House writing rules: no em/en dashes, no AI-tell triads, no hedge words, active voice, one idea per line. - Claim only what actually shipped. If it's on a branch and not merged/deployed, say so. - Never invent a change that isn't in the diff. If the WHY isn't recoverable, describe the what plainly rather than guessing intent.
Auf GitHub ansehen