| name | weekly-review |
| description | Digest the outputs archive into durable context. Use for the weekly GTM review, or whenever asked what happened recently and what we learned. Reads recent outputs entries, summarizes results, and proposes context updates as a PR. This is the repo's memory flywheel. |
Weekly review: outputs to context
outputs/ is what happened. context/ is what we know. This skill moves
learning from the first to the second, so the repo gets smarter every week.
Steps
-
Collect. List outputs/ entries from the last 7 days (directory names
start with the date). Read each entry's summary.
-
Summarize. Write outputs/YYYY-MM-DD-weekly-review/README.md with:
- What ran (plays, campaigns, research) and headline numbers.
- What worked, what failed, with evidence.
- Open questions.
-
Extract durable learning. For each finding that changes what we know,
propose the matching context edit:
- A new objection heard twice or more:
context/objection/<slug>.md.
- A win or loss with a clear reason: update
context/client/ and
context/proof/.
- A signal that predicted a conversion:
context/signal/<slug>.md.
- Messaging that outperformed: note it in the relevant
context/motion/.
Apply the repetition rule: a claim goes into context after it shows up
independently at least twice. Once is an anecdote.
-
Ship. One PR: the review entry in outputs/ plus the proposed context
edits. The PR description separates "observed" (outputs) from "concluded"
(context changes) so reviewers can push back on conclusions.
Rules
- Outputs entries are append-only. Never rewrite last week's entry.
- If nothing meets the repetition bar, say so; an empty context diff is a
valid review.
