Skip to main content

page-save-origin-semantics

Auto-invoked when modifying origin-based conflict detection, revision validation logic, or isUpdatable() method. Explains the two-stage origin check mechanism for conflict detection and its separation from diff detection.

Quellinformationen

Repository
growilabs/growi
Letzte Quellaktivität
6. Februar 2026 um 14:43
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
1.470
Forks
246

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
page-save-origin-semantics
description
Auto-invoked when modifying origin-based conflict detection, revision validation logic, or isUpdatable() method. Explains the two-stage origin check mechanism for conflict detection and its separation from diff detection.
# Page Save Origin Semantics ## Problem When modifying page save logic, it's easy to accidentally break the carefully designed origin-based conflict detection system. The system uses a two-stage check mechanism (frontend + backend) to determine when revision validation should be enforced vs. bypassed for collaborative editing (Yjs). **Key Insight**: **Conflict detection (revision check)** and **diff detection (hasDiffToPrev)** serve different purposes and require separate logic. ## Solution Understanding the two-stage origin check mechanism: ### Stage 1: Frontend Determines revisionId Requirement ```typescript // apps/app/src/client/components/PageEditor/PageEditor.tsx:158 const isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = currentPage?.revision?.origin === undefined; // lines 308-310 const revisionId = isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate ? currentRevisionId : undefined; ``` **Logic**: Check the **latest revision's origin** on the page: - If `origin === undefined` (legacy/API save) → Send `revisionId` - If `origin === "editor"` or `"view"` → Do NOT send `revisionId` ### Stage 2: Backend Determines Conflict Check Behavior ```javascript // apps/app/src/server/models/obsolete-page.js:167-172 const ignoreLatestRevision = origin === Origin.Editor && (latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.Editor || latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.View); if (ignoreLatestRevision) { return true; // Bypass revision check } // Otherwise, enforce strict revision matching if (revision != previousRevision) { return false; // Reject save } return true; ``` **Logic**: Check **current request's origin** AND **latest revision's origin**: - If `origin === "editor"` AND latest is `"editor"` or `"view"` → Bypass revision check - Otherwise → Enforce strict revision ID matching ## Origin Values Three types of page update methods (called "origin"): - **`Origin.Editor = "editor"`** - Save from editor mode (collaborative editing via Yjs) - **`Origin.View = "view"`** - Save from view mode - Examples: HandsontableModal, DrawioModal editing - **`undefined`** - API-based saves or legacy pages ## Origin Strength (強弱) **Basic Rule**: Page updates require the previous revision ID in the request. If the latest revision doesn't match, the server rejects the request. **Exception - Editor origin is stronger than View origin**: - **UX Goal**: Avoid `Posted param "revisionId" is outdated` errors when multiple members are using the Editor and View changes interrupt them - **Special Case**: When the latest revision's origin is View, Editor origin requests can update WITHOUT requiring revision ID ### Origin Strength Matrix | | Latest Revision: Editor | Latest Revision: View | Latest Revision: API | | ------ | ----------------------- | --------------------- | -------------------- | | **Request: Editor** | ⭕️ Bypass revision check | ⭕️ Bypass revision check | ❌ Strict check | | **Request: View** | ❌ Strict check | ❌ Strict check | ❌ Strict check | | **Request: API** | ❌ Strict check | ❌ Strict check | ❌ Strict check | **Reading the table**: - ⭕️ = Revision check bypassed (revisionId not required) - ❌ = Strict revision check required (revisionId must match) ## Behavior by Scenario | Latest Revision Origin | Request Origin | revisionId Sent? | Revision Check | Use Case | |------------------------|----------------|------------------|----------------|----------| | `editor` or `view` | `editor` | ❌ No | ✅ Bypassed | Normal Editor use (most common) | | `undefined` | `editor` | ✅ Yes | ✅ Enforced | Legacy page in Editor | | `undefined` | `undefined` (API) | ✅ Yes (required) | ✅ Enforced | API save | ## Example: Server-Side Logic Respecting Origin Semantics When adding server-side functionality that needs previous revision data: ```typescript // ✅ CORRECT: Separate concerns - conflict detection vs. diff detection let previousRevision: IRevisionHasId | null = null; // Priority 1: Use provided revisionId (for conflict detection) if (sanitizeRevisionId != null) { previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId); } // Priority 2: Fallback to currentPage.revision (for other purposes like diff detection) if (previousRevision == null && currentPage.revision != null) { previousRevision = await Revision.findById(currentPage.revision); } const previousBody = previousRevision?.body ?? null; // Continue with existing conflict detection logic (unchanged) if (currentPage != null && !(await currentPage.isUpdatable(sanitizeRevisionId, origin))) { // ... return conflict error } // Use previousBody for diff detection or other purposes updatedPage = await crowi.pageService.updatePage( currentPage, body, previousBody, // ← Available regardless of conflict detection logic req.user, options, ); ``` ```typescript // ❌ WRONG: Forcing frontend to always send revisionId const revisionId = currentRevisionId; // Always send, regardless of origin // This breaks Yjs collaborative editing semantics! ``` ```typescript // ❌ WRONG: Changing backend conflict detection logic // Don't modify isUpdatable() unless you fully understand the implications // for collaborative editing ``` ## When to Apply **Always consider this pattern when**: - Modifying page save/update API handlers - Adding functionality that needs previous revision data - Working on conflict detection or revision validation logic - Implementing features that interact with page history - Debugging save operation issues **Key Principles**: 1. **Do NOT modify frontend revisionId logic** unless explicitly required for conflict detection 2. **Do NOT modify isUpdatable() logic** unless fixing conflict detection bugs 3. **Separate concerns**: Conflict detection ≠ Other revision-based features (diff detection, history, etc.) 4. **Server-side fallback**: If you need previous revision data when revisionId is not provided, fetch from `currentPage.revision` ## Detailed Scenario Analysis ### Scenario A: Normal Editor Mode (Most Common Case) **Latest revision has `origin=editor`**: 1. **Frontend Logic**: - `isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = false` (latest revision origin is not undefined) - Does NOT send `revisionId` in request - Sends `origin: Origin.Editor` 2. **API Layer**: ```typescript previousRevision = await Revision.findById(undefined); // → null ``` Result: No previousRevision fetched via revisionId 3. **Backend Conflict Check** (`isUpdatable`): ```javascript ignoreLatestRevision = (Origin.Editor === Origin.Editor) && (latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.Editor || latestRevisionOrigin === Origin.View) // → true (latest revision is editor) return true; // Bypass revision check ``` Result: ✅ Save succeeds without revision validation 4. **Impact on Other Features**: - If you need previousRevision data (e.g., for diff detection), it won't be available unless you implement server-side fallback - This is where `currentPage.revision` fallback becomes necessary ### Scenario B: Legacy Page in Editor Mode **Latest revision has `origin=undefined`**: 1. **Frontend Logic**: - `isRevisionIdRequiredForPageUpdate = true` (latest revision origin is undefined) - Sends `revisionId` in request - Sends `origin: Origin.Editor` 2. **API Layer**: ```typescript previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId); // → revision object ``` Result: previousRevision fetched successfully 3. **Backend Conflict Check** (`isUpdatable`): ```javascript ignoreLatestRevision = (Origin.Editor === Origin.Editor) && (latestRevisionOrigin === undefined) // → false (latest revision is undefined, not editor/view) // Strict revision check if (revision != sanitizeRevisionId) { return false; // Reject if mismatch } return true; ``` Result: ✅ Save succeeds only if revisionId matches 4. **Impact on Other Features**: - previousRevision data is available - All revision-based features work correctly ### Scenario C: API-Based Save **Request has `origin=undefined` or omitted**: 1. **Frontend**: Not applicable (API client) 2. **API Layer**: - API client MUST send `revisionId` in request - `previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId)` 3. **Backend Conflict Check** (`isUpdatable`): ```javascript ignoreLatestRevision = (undefined === Origin.Editor) && ... // → false // Strict revision check if (revision != sanitizeRevisionId) { return false; } return true; ``` Result: Strict validation enforced ## Root Cause: Why This Separation Matters **Historical Context**: At some point, the frontend stopped sending `previousRevision` (revisionId) for certain scenarios to support Yjs collaborative editing. This broke features that relied on previousRevision data being available. **The Core Issue**: - **Conflict detection** needs to know "Is this save conflicting with another user's changes?" (Answered by revision check) - **Diff detection** needs to know "Did the content actually change?" (Answered by comparing body) - **Current implementation conflates these**: When conflict detection is bypassed, previousRevision is not fetched, breaking diff detection **The Solution Pattern**: ```typescript // Separate the two concerns: // 1. Fetch previousRevision for data purposes (diff detection, history, etc.) let previousRevision: IRevisionHasId | null = null; if (sanitizeRevisionId != null) { previousRevision = await Revision.findById(sanitizeRevisionId); } else if (currentPage.revision != null) { previousRevision = await Revision.findById(currentPage.revision); // Fallback } // 2. Use previousRevision data for your feature const previousBody = previousRevision?.body ?? null; // 3. Conflict detection happens independently via isUpdatable() if (currentPage != null && !(await currentPage.isUpdatable(sanitizeRevisionId, origin))) { // Return conflict error } ``` ## Reference **Official Documentation**: - https://dev.growi.org/651a6f4a008fee2f99187431#origin-%E3%81%AE%E5%BC%B7%E5%BC%B1 **Related Files**: - Frontend: `apps/app/src/client/components/PageEditor/PageEditor.tsx` (lines 158, 240, 308-310) - Backend: `apps/app/src/server/models/obsolete-page.js` (lines 159-182, isUpdatable method) - API: `apps/app/src/server/routes/apiv3/page/update-page.ts` (lines 260-282, conflict check) - Interface: `packages/core/src/interfaces/revision.ts` (lines 6-11, Origin definition) ## Common Pitfalls 1. **Assuming revisionId is always available**: It's not! Editor mode with recent editor/view saves omits it by design. 2. **Conflating conflict detection with other features**: They serve different purposes and need separate logic. 3. **Breaking Yjs collaborative editing**: Forcing revisionId to always be sent breaks the bypass mechanism. 4. **Ignoring origin values**: The system behavior changes significantly based on origin combinations. ## Lessons Learned This pattern was identified during the "improve-unchanged-revision" feature implementation, where the initial assumption was that frontend should always send `revisionId` for diff detection. Deep analysis revealed: - The frontend logic is correct for conflict detection and should NOT be changed - Server-side fallback is the correct approach to get previous revision data - Two-stage checking is intentional and critical for Yjs collaborative editing - Conflict detection and diff detection must be separated **Key Takeaway**: Always understand the existing architectural patterns before proposing changes. What appears to be a "fix" might actually break carefully designed functionality.
Auf GitHub ansehen