Skip to main content

incident-response

Security incident detection, analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned per NIST SP 800-61r2 and ISO 27035

Quellinformationen

Repository
Hack23/cia
Letzte Quellaktivität
24. Mai 2026 um 23:43
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
239
Forks
57

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
incident-response
description
Security incident detection, analysis, containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned per NIST SP 800-61r2 and ISO 27035
license
Apache-2.0
# Incident Response Skill ## Purpose This skill establishes comprehensive procedures for detecting, analyzing, containing, eradicating, and recovering from security incidents affecting the CIA platform. It implements systematic incident management aligned with NIST SP 800-61r2, ISO 27035, and Hack23 ISMS Incident Response Plan with measurable response times and transparent communication. ## When to Use This Skill Apply this skill when: - ✅ Detecting security alerts or suspicious activity - ✅ Responding to security breaches or data exposure - ✅ Managing vulnerability exploitation incidents - ✅ Coordinating response to service disruptions - ✅ Handling supply chain security incidents - ✅ Meeting GDPR 72-hour breach notification requirements - ✅ Conducting post-incident analysis and lessons learned - ✅ Updating incident response playbooks Do NOT use for: - ❌ Routine maintenance or planned downtime - ❌ Non-security operational issues - ❌ Performance degradation without security implications ## Decision Tree ```mermaid %%{ init: { 'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#D32F2F', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'lineColor': '#D32F2F', 'secondaryColor': '#FF9800', 'tertiaryColor': '#4CAF50' } } }%% flowchart TD DETECT["🔍 Incident Detected"] --> VALIDATE{"✅ Confirmed<br/>Security Incident?"} VALIDATE -->|YES| CLASSIFY{"🏷️ Classify Severity"} VALIDATE -->|NO| FALSE["📋 False Positive<br/>Document & Close"] CLASSIFY -->|🔴 Critical<br/>€10K+ daily loss| S1["🔴 S1: Critical Response<br/>RTO: 30 min<br/>All Stakeholders"] CLASSIFY -->|🟠 High<br/>€5-10K daily loss| S2["🟠 S2: High Response<br/>RTO: 1 hour<br/>Key Stakeholders"] CLASSIFY -->|🟡 Medium<br/>€1-5K daily loss| S3["🟡 S3: Medium Response<br/>RTO: 4 hours<br/>Internal Only"] CLASSIFY -->|🟢 Low<br/><€1K daily loss| S4["🟢 S4: Low Response<br/>RTO: 24 hours<br/>Documentation"] S1 --> ACTIVATE["🚨 Activate Response Team<br/>CEO + Specialists"] S2 --> ACTIVATE S3 --> ACTIVATE S4 --> ACTIVATE ACTIVATE --> CONTAIN["🛡️ Containment<br/>Isolate & Preserve"] CONTAIN --> INVESTIGATE["🔬 Investigation<br/>Root Cause Analysis"] INVESTIGATE --> REMEDIATE["🔧 Remediation<br/>Fix & Restore"] REMEDIATE --> VALIDATE_FIX{"✅ Validated?"} VALIDATE_FIX -->|NO| REMEDIATE VALIDATE_FIX -->|YES| NOTIFY{"📢 External<br/>Notification<br/>Required?"} NOTIFY -->|YES - GDPR| GDPR["📢 GDPR Notification<br/>72-hour deadline"] NOTIFY -->|YES - NIS2| NIS2["📢 NIS2 Notification<br/>24-hour initial"] NOTIFY -->|YES - Customers| CUSTOMER["📢 Customer Notice<br/>Per SLA"] NOTIFY -->|NO| DOCUMENT GDPR --> DOCUMENT["📝 Incident Report"] NIS2 --> DOCUMENT CUSTOMER --> DOCUMENT DOCUMENT --> LESSONS["📈 Lessons Learned<br/>Process Improvement"] LESSONS --> CLOSE["✅ Close Incident<br/>Archive Evidence"] CLOSE --> MONITOR["🔄 Continuous Monitoring"] style DETECT fill:#2196F3,color:#fff style S1 fill:#D32F2F,color:#fff style S2 fill:#FF9800,color:#fff style S3 fill:#FFC107,color:#000 style S4 fill:#4CAF50,color:#fff style CONTAIN fill:#7B1FA2,color:#fff style INVESTIGATE fill:#1565C0,color:#fff style REMEDIATE fill:#FF9800,color:#fff style CLOSE fill:#4CAF50,color:#fff ``` ## Incident Severity Classification ### Severity Matrix | **Severity** | **Financial Impact** | **Operational Impact** | **RTO** | **Escalation** | |--------------|---------------------|------------------------|---------|----------------| | **🔴 S1: Critical** | €10K+ daily loss | Complete outage | **30 minutes** | CEO + External Consultant | | **🟠 S2: High** | €5-10K daily loss | Major degradation | **1 hour** | CEO + Insurance Provider | | **🟡 S3: Medium** | €1-5K daily loss | Partial impact | **4 hours** | CEO Investigation | | **🟢 S4: Low** | <€1K daily loss | Minor inconvenience | **24 hours** | CEO Scheduled Review | ### Incident Classification Examples **🔴 S1: Critical Incidents** - Ransomware infection affecting production systems - Active data breach with PII exposure - Complete service outage affecting all users - Successful credential theft with admin access - Criminal liability (GDPR Article 83 violations) **🟠 S2: High Incidents** - Exploitation of critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.0+) - Partial data exposure (limited user data) - Major service degradation (>50% users affected) - Unauthorized access to sensitive systems - Regulatory investigation triggered **🟡 S3: Medium Incidents** - Attempted exploitation (blocked by controls) - Security misconfigurations discovered - Malware detected and quarantined - Moderate service impact (<50% users) - Minor compliance violations **🟢 S4: Low Incidents** - Failed login attempts (below threshold) - Security scan false positives - Minor policy violations - Suspicious activity with no impact - Documentation issues ## Incident Response Lifecycle ### Phase 1: Preparation **Pre-Incident Readiness:** ```yaml Incident_Response_Team: - CEO: James Pether Sörling (Incident Commander) - Security Lead: Primary responder - Development Lead: Technical remediation - External Consultant: On-call security expert - Legal Counsel: GDPR/regulatory compliance - Insurance Provider: Cyber insurance liaison Tools_and_Resources: - AWS Detective: Log analysis and investigation - AWS Security Hub: Centralized security findings - AWS GuardDuty: Threat detection - GitHub Security: Repository security monitoring - CloudWatch Logs Insights: Query and analysis - Incident Response Playbooks: Scenario-specific procedures Communication_Channels: - Primary: CEO email (james.sorling@hack23.com) - Secondary: GitHub Issues (private security issues) - Emergency: AWS Support (Enterprise plan) - External: External Stakeholder Registry contacts - Documentation: ISMS-PUBLIC repository updates Evidence_Preservation: - AWS CloudTrail: 90-day retention - Application Logs: CloudWatch 30-day retention - Database Audit Logs: 90-day retention - Network Flow Logs: VPC Flow Logs 7-day retention - Backup Snapshots: Automated daily backups ``` **Preparation Checklist:** - [ ] **Incident Response Plan:** Reviewed and updated quarterly - [ ] **Contact List:** Current and tested (External Stakeholder Registry) - [ ] **Playbooks:** Scenario-specific procedures documented - [ ] **Tools:** AWS security services enabled and monitored - [ ] **Training:** Annual tabletop exercises conducted - [ ] **Backups:** Verified and tested monthly - [ ] **Insurance:** Cyber insurance policy active and adequate - [ ] **Legal:** Retainer with legal counsel for GDPR compliance ### Phase 2: Detection and Analysis **Detection Sources:** ```mermaid flowchart LR subgraph "🔍 Automated Detection" GUARD[AWS GuardDuty<br/>Threat Detection] SECHUB[AWS Security Hub<br/>Findings Aggregation] CODEQL[CodeQL<br/>Code Scanning] DEPEND[Dependabot<br/>Vulnerability Alerts] end subgraph "👁️ Manual Detection" USER[User Report<br/>Security Concern] AUDIT[Security Audit<br/>Findings] RESEARCH[Security Researcher<br/>Disclosure] MONITOR[System Monitoring<br/>Anomalies] end subgraph "🎯 Incident Triage" VALIDATE[Validate Incident] CLASSIFY[Classify Severity] ASSIGN[Assign Response Team] end GUARD --> VALIDATE SECHUB --> VALIDATE CODEQL --> VALIDATE DEPEND --> VALIDATE USER --> VALIDATE AUDIT --> VALIDATE RESEARCH --> VALIDATE MONITOR --> VALIDATE VALIDATE --> CLASSIFY CLASSIFY --> ASSIGN style VALIDATE fill:#FF9800,color:#fff style CLASSIFY fill:#D32F2F,color:#fff style ASSIGN fill:#1565C0,color:#fff ``` **Initial Assessment Checklist:** - [ ] **Incident Confirmed:** Validate security incident vs. false positive - [ ] **Scope Identified:** Affected systems, data, and users documented - [ ] **Timeline Established:** Initial detection and estimated start time - [ ] **Severity Classified:** Using severity matrix (S1-S4) - [ ] **Evidence Preserved:** Logs, snapshots, and artifacts collected - [ ] **Team Notified:** Response team activated per severity level - [ ] **Stakeholders Informed:** CEO notified within RTO - [ ] **Communication Plan:** Notification requirements assessed **Analysis Activities:** ```bash # 1. Collect AWS CloudTrail logs aws cloudtrail lookup-events \ --lookup-attributes AttributeKey=EventName,AttributeValue=AssumeRole \ --start-time 2024-01-15T00:00:00Z \ --end-time 2024-01-16T00:00:00Z \ --max-results 100 \ > incident-cloudtrail-logs.json # 2. Query CloudWatch Logs aws logs filter-log-events \ --log-group-name /aws/lambda/cia-production \ --start-time $(date -d '24 hours ago' +%s)000 \ --filter-pattern "ERROR" \ > incident-application-logs.txt # 3. Check AWS GuardDuty findings aws guardduty list-findings \ --detector-id YOUR_DETECTOR_ID \ --finding-criteria '{"Criterion":{"severity":{"Gte":7}}}' \ --sort-criteria '{"AttributeName":"updatedAt","OrderBy":"DESC"}' \ > incident-guardduty-findings.json # 4. Review AWS Security Hub findings aws securityhub get-findings \ --filters '{"SeverityLabel":[{"Value":"CRITICAL","Comparison":"EQUALS"}]}' \ --max-results 100 \ > incident-securityhub-findings.json # 5. Analyze access patterns aws cloudtrail lookup-events \ --lookup-attributes AttributeKey=Username,AttributeValue=SUSPECTED_USER \ --start-time 2024-01-15T00:00:00Z \ > incident-user-activity.json # 6. Create evidence package tar -czf incident-evidence-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S).tar.gz \ incident-*.json incident-*.txt ``` ### Phase 3: Containment **Short-Term Containment:** ```yaml Immediate_Actions: Network_Isolation: - Action: Isolate affected systems from network - Method: AWS Security Group rule changes - Command: | aws ec2 revoke-security-group-ingress \ --group-id sg-AFFECTED \ --protocol all \ --cidr 0.0.0.0/0 Access_Revocation: - Action: Disable compromised user accounts - Method: AWS IAM policy detachment - Command: | aws iam delete-login-profile \ --user-name COMPROMISED_USER aws iam list-access-keys \ --user-name COMPROMISED_USER | \ jq -r '.AccessKeyMetadata[].AccessKeyId' | \ xargs -I {} aws iam delete-access-key \ --user-name COMPROMISED_USER \ --access-key-id {} Session_Termination: - Action: Invalidate active sessions - Method: AWS IAM role trust policy update - Command: | aws iam update-assume-role-policy \ --role-name AFFECTED_ROLE \ --policy-document file://deny-all-policy.json Snapshot_Creation: - Action: Preserve current state for forensics - Method: EBS snapshot, RDS snapshot, S3 versioning - Command: | aws ec2 create-snapshot \ --volume-id vol-AFFECTED \ --description "Incident forensic snapshot $(date)" aws rds create-db-snapshot \ --db-snapshot-identifier incident-snapshot-$(date +%Y%m%d) \ --db-instance-identifier cia-production ``` **Long-Term Containment:** ```yaml Sustained_Protection: System_Patching: - Action: Apply security patches to affected systems - Priority: Critical vulnerabilities first - Validation: Test in staging before production Password_Rotation: - Action: Force password reset for all affected users - Method: AWS Cognito password reset enforcement - Scope: All users if credential exposure suspected Certificate_Revocation: - Action: Revoke and reissue compromised certificates - Method: AWS Certificate Manager - Timeline: Immediate for compromised, planned for rotation WAF_Rules: - Action: Deploy AWS WAF rules to block attack patterns - Patterns: IP blocking, SQL injection, XSS prevention - Review: Daily review during incident response Enhanced_Monitoring: - Action: Increase logging verbosity and alerting - Tools: CloudWatch alarms, GuardDuty sensitivity - Duration: Maintain until incident closed + 30 days ``` ### Phase 4: Eradication **Root Cause Elimination:** ```yaml Malware_Removal: - Identify all infected systems (AWS Systems Manager inventory) - Terminate compromised EC2 instances - Deploy clean AMI from known-good backup - Scan file systems with AWS Inspector - Verify integrity with AWS CloudWatch Logs Insights Vulnerability_Patching: - Apply security patches addressing root cause - Update dependencies (Dependabot PRs) - Fix configuration weaknesses (AWS Config remediation) - Implement compensating controls if patch unavailable Account_Cleanup: - Remove unauthorized user accounts (AWS IAM) - Delete rogue resources (EC2, Lambda, S3) - Audit and correct permission escalations - Review and revoke suspicious API keys Configuration_Hardening: - Enable AWS GuardDuty if disabled - Enforce MFA for all IAM users - Implement least privilege IAM policies - Enable encryption at rest (S3, EBS, RDS) - Enable VPC Flow Logs for network monitoring ``` **Eradication Checklist:** - [ ] **Root Cause Identified:** Technical analysis complete - [ ] **Vulnerability Fixed:** Patch applied or workaround implemented - [ ] **Malware Removed:** All infected systems cleaned or replaced - [ ] **Accounts Secured:** Unauthorized access revoked - [ ] **Configuration Hardened:** Security controls strengthened - [ ] **Validation Testing:** Security scans confirm clean state - [ ] **Documentation Updated:** Changes recorded in change log ### Phase 5: Recovery
Auf GitHub ansehen
Diese SKILL.md ist sehr gross, daher zeigt SkillsMP hier nur den ersten Abschnitt. Auf GitHub ansehen