Skip to main content

shaping-framing

Create an evidence-backed frame from messy transcripts and notes before capsule/card planning. Use when discovery inputs are conversation-heavy and the problem statement is still diffuse.

Quellinformationen

Repository
hashintel/labs
Letzte Quellaktivität
23. März 2026 um 12:12
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
36
Forks
14

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
shaping-framing
description
Create an evidence-backed frame from messy transcripts and notes before capsule/card planning. Use when discovery inputs are conversation-heavy and the problem statement is still diffuse.
argument-hint
[topic and transcript paths, or context bundle to frame]
# Shape Framing (Adjunct) Use this adjunct skill to distill conversation artifacts into a clear frame that can feed pragma planning. ## Source And Adaptation Note Adopted from `rjs/shaping-skills` (`framing-doc`) and adapted for this repository. Modifications: - Namespaced as `pragma:shaping-*` to avoid routing ambiguity - Explicit pragma re-entry requirements - Authority boundaries aligned to `docs/shape-pragma-integration.md` ## When To Use - Inputs are transcripts, call notes, or scattered stakeholder messages - The team agrees a problem exists but cannot state it crisply yet - You need an evidence-backed "why now" before capsule/card work ## When Not To Use - You already have a stable capsule and clear next slice - The task is implementation-ready and only needs `/pragma:card` ## Procedure 1. Collect source inputs and confirm ordering when chronology matters. 2. Extract direct evidence and separate it from synthesis. 3. Produce a frame with Problem, Outcome, and boundaries. 4. Identify what changed in understanding and what remains uncertain. 5. Define the pragma re-entry step. ## Required Output ```md ## Frame [evidence-backed problem and outcome] ## Handoff To Pragma - Capsule impacts: [terms/invariants to add or revise] - Candidate cards: [1-3 candidate slice behaviors] - Open uncertainty: [items requiring `/pragma:spike`] - Next command: [`/pragma:capsule` or `/pragma:card`] ``` ## Constraints - Do not prescribe implementation details. - Do not replace capsule authority over vocabulary and invariants. - Do not route directly to `/pragma:slice`. ## Lifecycle - **State**: `discovery` - **Next**: `/pragma:capsule` (default) or `/pragma:card` (if capsule is stable) - **Loop**: `/pragma:consult`
Auf GitHub ansehen