review

name	review
description	Bug-focused PetSwipe review workflow emphasizing regressions, deployment risk, missing validation, and stale docs.

Use this skill when the user asks for a review or when a high-risk change needs structured scrutiny.

Workflow

1. Review for correctness and regression risk first.
2. Check deployment, validation, and doc-sync impact second.
3. Prefer concrete findings over broad commentary.
4. If there are no findings, say so explicitly and mention residual uncertainty.

Output Standard

• Findings first
• Highest severity first
• File references whenever possible
• Brief open questions or residual risks after findings

Use the petswipe-reviewer subagent when you want isolated review context.

@references/review-checklist.md