Skip to main content

codexkit-cloud-delegation

Break complex work into bounded Codex delegation tasks with clear ownership, expected outputs, and integration checkpoints.

Quellinformationen

Repository
hoavdc/CodexKit
Letzte Quellaktivität
22. März 2026 um 17:03
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
26
Forks
12

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
codexkit-cloud-delegation
description
Break complex work into bounded Codex delegation tasks with clear ownership, expected outputs, and integration checkpoints.
version
1.0.0
category
infra
# Cloud Delegation Use this skill when the task is large enough to benefit from multiple Codex runs, worktrees, or specialized passes. ## Workflow 1. Separate blocking work from parallel sidecar work. 2. Assign each delegated task a narrow objective and write scope. 3. Require the delegated worker to report changed files and validation run. 4. Integrate results quickly instead of waiting on every branch. 5. Keep final synthesis centralized. ## Good delegated tasks - isolated test authoring - docs updates after implementation - codebase reconnaissance on a bounded topic - verification passes that can run while implementation continues ## Avoid - delegating the immediate critical path - overlapping write scopes - vague asks like "analyze everything" ## Quality Criteria - [ ] All dependencies and prerequisites are documented - [ ] Changes are reversible or include a rollback plan - [ ] Security implications are assessed for each configuration change - [ ] Monitoring and alerting are defined for post-deployment validation ## Verification (4C) | Check | Question | |-------|----------| | **Correctness** | Are all configurations, permissions, and dependencies accurate? | | **Completeness** | Does the setup cover dev, staging, and prod environments as needed? | | **Context-fit** | Is the solution proportional to the problem (not over/under-engineered)? | | **Consequence** | If deployed as-is to production, what is the highest-risk failure mode? | ## Edge Cases - **Target environment has pre-existing configuration** — Scan for conflicts before applying changes. Document what to preserve. - **Permissions differ between environments** — Test in staging first. Document the minimum permissions required. - **Third-party service is unavailable or deprecated** — Document fallback or alternative. Include health-check endpoints. ## Changelog - v1.0.0 — Initial release
Auf GitHub ansehen