client-proposal

name	client-proposal
description	Client proposal generation on {{PERSONAL_DOMAIN}} — create branded, password-gated proposal pages with phased scope, pricing, timelines, and shareable URLs. Use when user says "create proposal", "client proposal", "write proposal", "proposal for [name]", "new proposal", "send proposal", "build proposal page", "proposal draft", "update proposal", "revise proposal", or any client proposal activity.

Client Proposal Skill

This skill enables any agent to create professional, branded client proposals hosted on {{PERSONAL_DOMAIN}}. Proposals are full Astro pages with password protection, dark-themed design, and shareable URLs — replacing generic PDF proposals with an interactive web experience that reinforces {{PARENT_1}}'s brand.

Reference Implementation

The canonical example is the Blackout Pickleball proposal:

• File: src/pages/proposals/blackout-pickleball.astro in {{GITHUB_USERNAME}}/htek-dev-site
• URL: https://{{PERSONAL_DOMAIN}}/proposals/blackout-pickleball
• Features: Password gate, table of contents, phased scope, timeline, investment breakdown, terms, "Why {{GITHUB_USERNAME}}" section

---

Critical Rules — Read These First

1. Every proposal is a standalone Astro page at src/pages/proposals/{client-slug}.astro. The slug is lowercase-hyphenated from the client/project name (e.g., blackout-pickleball, ahis-consulting).

2. Password-gated by default. All proposals include a client-side password gate so only the intended recipient can view. The password is shared with the client separately (via Telegram, email, or call).

3. noindex, nofollow. Proposals are NEVER indexed by search engines. Always include <meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow" />.

4. Brand consistency. Use {{PERSONAL_DOMAIN}}'s existing design system — dark theme (bg-bg-void, bg-bg-surface), accent colors (accent-cyan, accent-violet, accent-green, accent-rose), and Tailwind utility classes.

5. Data-driven structure. Define proposal data as typed arrays/objects in the Astro frontmatter, then render with .map(). This keeps content separate from markup and makes revisions trivial.

6. Premium positioning. Proposals reflect {{PARENT_1}}'s premium pricing strategy. Present value first, investment second. Frame costs as "investment" not "cost/price."

7. Mobile-first. Proposals must look excellent on mobile — clients often view them from their phone immediately after receiving the link.

8. Lead folder integration. When creating a proposal, update the corresponding lead folder at data/projects/leads/{slug}/ with proposal status, URL, and pricing in opportunity.md.

9. Versioning via git. Revisions are tracked through git commits on the htek-dev-site repo. Major revisions can be noted in the proposal number (e.g., #BP-2026-001 → #BP-2026-002).

10. Always create a follow-up task after generating a proposal — "Follow up with [client] on proposal" with a due date 2-3 days out.

11. NEVER suggest Zapier, Make.com, or any no-code automation platform. {{PARENT_1}} is a senior developer. All integrations should be raw code (Vercel serverless, AWS, custom scripts). No-code tools are never appropriate for his proposals.

12. Technical spec BEFORE proposal. For any project with custom development, create a technical spec (data/specs/{slug}-v1.md), get it reviewed by multiple models, and resolve architecture decisions BEFORE generating the proposal page. The proposal should reflect DECIDED architecture, not open questions.

---

Proposal Structure — Lean Default (4 Sections)

DEFAULT: Use the lean 4-section format. This is what closes deals. Clients don't want to read 10 pages — they want to understand scope, cost, dependencies, and how to start.

#	Section	What it answers
1	What am I going to build?	Scope — clear bullet points of deliverables + timeline estimate
2	How much does it cost?	Pricing — build fee, payment split, optional retainer
3	What services do we need?	Third-party costs — what client already pays vs. new costs
4	How do we start?	Next steps — payment, logins, scheduling, "work starts same day"

Tone & Style

• Conversational — like texting a friend who happens to be a developer
• Scannable — bullet points, short sentences, minimal tables
• No fluff — no "Why {{GITHUB_USERNAME}}", no numbered badges, no corporate jargon
• Readable in under 2 minutes — if it takes longer, cut more
• One clear CTA — "Questions? Text me or reply to this message."

When to use the FULL format (10+ sections)

Only for enterprise/complex projects where:

• Multiple stakeholders need different levels of detail
• The project is >$15K and requires formal approval workflows
• The client explicitly asks for a detailed breakdown
• There are regulatory/compliance requirements

For most of {{PARENT_1}}'s clients (friends, referrals, small businesses), the lean format is correct.

Lesson learned (CarPlay Mobile Detail, May 2026): The original 10-section proposal with badges, TOC, and corporate structure gave {{PARENT_1}} anxiety just reading it. Simplified to 4 sections → deal closed same day. Simpler = higher close rate.

Legacy Full Structure (use only when justified)

#	Section	Purpose
00	Table of Contents	Navigation overview
01	Executive Summary	What + why
02	Scope of Work	Detailed deliverables
03	Customer/User Experience	Flow/journey
04	Timeline & Milestones	Delivery plan
05	Technology	Tech stack
06	Investment	Pricing
07	What I Need From You	Client prerequisites
08	Terms & Ownership	Payment terms, IP
09	Why {{GITHUB_USERNAME}}	Differentiators

---

Pre-Proposal Workflow — Clarification Questions (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: Do NOT jump straight to building a proposal after a scope call. Before creating any proposal page, the agent MUST ask {{PARENT_1}} clarification questions to fill knowledge gaps. This prevents incomplete proposals that miss costs, dependencies, or client requirements.

When to Ask Clarification Questions

After capturing scope call notes but BEFORE generating any proposal code:

Required Clarification Categories

Ask {{PARENT_1}} about ALL of these before building:

1. Dependencies & Large Scope Items

   • Are there any scope items that depend on third-party services or accounts?
   • Any items that are significantly larger than others and should be called out?
   • Any scope items that could be phased or made optional?

2. Hosting & Infrastructure Mechanics

   • What hosting is recommended? (Keep existing? Migrate? Who pays?)
   • Are there infrastructure costs the client needs to understand?
   • Who manages DNS, SSL, CDN, etc.?

3. Third-Party Costs to Itemize

   • Are there recurring costs beyond {{PARENT_1}}'s fee? (e.g., Twilio, API subscriptions, domain renewal)
   • Should these be listed separately in the Investment section?
   • Does the client pay these directly or does {{PARENT_1}} bundle them?

4. "What's Required to Get Started" Details

   • What credentials/logins does {{PARENT_1}} need before starting?
   • What accounts does the client need to create?
   • What's the initial payment required?
   • What's the trigger that starts the clock? (payment received? assets received?)

5. Pricing Validation

   • Is the estimated value range correct?
   • Any adjustments based on scope complexity discovered during the call?
   • Split structure (50/50, full upfront, milestone-based)?

How to Ask

Create a single structured message to {{PARENT_1}} via Telegram:

🔍 Before I build the proposal for [Client], quick clarifications:

1. Dependencies: [specific question about this client]
2. Hosting: [specific question]
3. Third-party costs: [list potential ones, ask which to include]
4. To get started: [what do you need from client before work begins?]
5. Pricing: [confirm range/split]

Reply when ready and I'll build it.

What Happens Next

• If {{PARENT_1}} answers → Incorporate into proposal, then build
• If {{PARENT_1}} says "just build it" → Build with best available info, but flag assumptions clearly in the lead folder
• If time-sensitive (deadline promised to client) → Flag the deadline, still ask, but offer to build a draft while waiting for answers

Anti-Pattern

❌ Receiving a scope call transcript → immediately building the proposal → finding out later it's missing costs, has wrong pricing, or doesn't match {{PARENT_1}}'s intent. This is what happened with the CarPlay Mobile Detail proposal (May 6, 2026) and must never happen again.

---

Full Pipeline — The Correct Order (MANDATORY)

Scope Call → Clarification Questions → Technical Spec → Multi-Model Review → Proposal Generation

Step 0: Technical Spec (BEFORE any proposal code)

After clarification questions are answered, create a Technical Spec at data/specs/{client-slug}-v1.md that covers:

• Problem statement & goals
• Architecture & tech stack decisions (with rationale)
• Integration details (how each piece connects)
• Third-party costs (validated, with conditional items)
• Timeline with dependencies and blocker mitigations
• What's required from client (phased by timeline)
• Pricing recommendation with market comparison
• Risks & mitigations table
• Success metrics

Then launch 3 parallel code-review agents (different models) to validate:

• Technical feasibility
• Cost accuracy (are there hidden fees? missing licenses?)
• Timeline realism
• Integration risks and fallback plans
• Pricing validation

Only after the spec is reviewed and findings are incorporated do you proceed to build the proposal page. The proposal is a CLIENT-FACING SUMMARY of the reviewed spec — not a first draft.

Why This Matters

The spec catches errors BEFORE the client sees them:

• WPForms webhooks aren't free (caught in CarPlay review)
• SMS by Zapier has carrier restrictions (caught in CarPlay review)
• LiteSpeed may not be available on HostGator shared (caught in CarPlay review)
• Content dependency needs interview approach, not "client creates" (caught in CarPlay review)

Without the spec review, these would have been embarrassing corrections after the client already read the proposal.

---

Technical Process — Creating a New Proposal

Step 1: Clarification Questions (see Pre-Proposal Workflow above)

Ask {{PARENT_1}} clarification questions about dependencies, hosting, third-party costs, and "what's needed to start." Only proceed to Step 2 after getting answers (or explicit "just build it").

Step 1.5: Technical Spec + Review (see Full Pipeline above)

Create the spec, run multi-model review, incorporate findings. Only then proceed to building the proposal page.

Step 2: Gather Client Information

Before writing code, collect from the lead folder or directly from {{PARENT_1}}:

• Client/brand name and contact person
• Project description and goals
• Target launch date
• Budget range (or let {{PARENT_1}} set pricing)
• Any domain/hosting details
• Brand assets (logo, colors, existing site)
• Third-party costs (hosting, APIs, subscriptions the client will pay)
• What's needed to start (credentials, accounts, initial payment)

Step 3: Create the Proposal File

Create src/pages/proposals/{client-slug}.astro in the {{GITHUB_USERNAME}}/htek-dev-site repo.

DEFAULT: Use the lean 4-section template (see "Proposal Structure — Lean Default" above).

---
import BaseLayout from '../../layouts/BaseLayout.astro';
import Navbar from '../../components/Navbar.astro';
import Footer from '../../components/Footer.astro';

const pageTitle = 'Proposal — {Project Title}';
const pageDescription = 'Private proposal for {Client}.';
const PROPOSAL_PASSWORD = '{password}';
---

<BaseLayout title={pageTitle} description={pageDescription}>
  <Fragment slot="head">
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow" />
  </Fragment>

  <div class="min-h-screen bg-bg-void">
    <!-- Password Gate (same pattern as carplay-mobile-detail) -->
    <div id="proposal-gate" class="fixed inset-0 z-[999] flex items-center justify-center bg-bg-void">
      <!-- Gate UI -->
    </div>

    <!-- Proposal Content (hidden until authenticated) -->
    <div id="proposal-content" class="hidden">
      <Navbar />
      <main class="mx-auto max-w-3xl px-6 pb-20 pt-28">
        <!-- Section 1: What am I going to build? -->
        <!-- Section 2: How much does it cost? -->
        <!-- Section 3: What services do we need? -->
        <!-- Section 4: How do we start? -->
        <!-- Footer CTA: "Questions? Text me..." -->
      </main>
      <Footer />
    </div>
  </div>
</BaseLayout>

Reference implementation: src/pages/proposals/carplay-mobile-detail.astro (May 2026 — lean format)

For the legacy full format (enterprise/complex only), see the expanded template below:

<!-- Proposal Content (hidden until authenticated) -->
<div id="proposal-content" class="hidden">
  <Navbar />
  <main id="main-content" class="pb-20 pt-24">
    <!-- Sections rendered from data arrays -->
  </main>
  <Footer />
</div>

### Step 3: Design Patterns

**Section Header Pattern:**
```html
<div class="flex items-center gap-3">
  <span class="inline-flex h-10 w-10 items-center justify-center rounded-full bg-accent-cyan text-sm font-bold text-white">{number}</span>
  <div>
    <p class="font-mono text-xs uppercase tracking-[0.25em] text-accent-cyan">{subtitle}</p>
    <h2 class="font-heading text-2xl font-bold text-text-primary">{title}</h2>
  </div>
</div>

Card Grid Pattern (Scope, Tech):

<div class="grid gap-4 md:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3">
  {items.map((item) => (
    <div class="rounded-xl border border-border-default bg-bg-overlay p-5">
      <span class="text-2xl">{item.icon}</span>
      <h3 class="mt-2 font-semibold text-text-primary">{item.title}</h3>
      <p class="mt-1 text-sm text-text-secondary">{item.description}</p>
    </div>
  ))}
</div>

Timeline Pattern:

{timelineItems.map((item) => (
  <div class={`rounded-xl border p-5 ${item.launch ? 'border-accent-green bg-accent-green/10' : 'border-border-default bg-bg-overlay'}`}>
    <p class="font-mono text-xs text-accent-cyan">{item.day}</p>
    <h3 class="mt-1 font-semibold text-text-primary">{item.title}</h3>
    <p class="mt-1 text-sm text-text-secondary">{item.description}</p>
  </div>
))}

Investment Section Pattern:

<!-- Two-column: Build Fee (one-time) + Retainer (monthly) -->
<div class="grid gap-6 md:grid-cols-2">
  <div class="rounded-2xl border border-border-default bg-bg-overlay p-6">
    <p class="font-mono text-xs text-accent-cyan">One-Time Build</p>
    <p class="mt-2 text-4xl font-bold text-text-primary">$X,XXX</p>
    <ul class="mt-4 space-y-2 text-sm text-text-secondary">
      {buildIncludes.map((item) => <li>✓ {item}</li>)}
    </ul>
  </div>
  <div class="rounded-2xl border border-accent-cyan/30 bg-accent-cyan/5 p-6">
    <p class="font-mono text-xs text-accent-cyan">Monthly Retainer</p>
    <p class="mt-2 text-4xl font-bold text-text-primary">$XXX<span class="text-lg text-text-muted">/mo</span></p>
    <ul =>
      {retainerIncludes.map((item) => ✓ {item})}
    
  




  Third-Party Costs (paid by you directly)
  
    {thirdPartyCosts.map((item) => {item.service}: {item.cost} — {item.description})}
  

Investment Section MUST include (per {{PARENT_1}}'s May 6, 2026 feedback):

• {{PARENT_1}}'s fee clearly separated from third-party costs
• Any recurring costs the client will pay directly (hosting, APIs, subscriptions)
• A "What's Required to Get Started" subsection or link to that section
• Large scope items called out with justification for their cost contribution

Step 4: Password Gate Script

<script>
  const PROPOSAL_PASSWORD = 'client-chosen-password';
  const STORAGE_KEY = 'proposal-{slug}-auth';

  function unlock() {
    document.getElementById('proposal-gate')?.remove();
    document.getElementById('proposal-content')?.classList.remove('hidden');
    sessionStorage.setItem(STORAGE_KEY, 'true');
  }

  if (sessionStorage.getItem(STORAGE_KEY) === 'true') {
    unlock();
  }

  document.getElementById('proposal-gate-form')?.addEventListener('submit', (e) => {
    e.preventDefault();
    const input = document.getElementById('proposal-password') as HTMLInputElement;
    if (input.value === PROPOSAL_PASSWORD) {
      ();
    }  {
      .()?..();
    }
  });

Step 5: Deploy & Share

1. Commit the new proposal file to {{GITHUB_USERNAME}}/htek-dev-site main branch
2. Vercel auto-deploys — the site rebuilds on push to main
3. URL format: https://{{PERSONAL_DOMAIN}}/proposals/{client-slug}
4. Share the URL + password with the client via Telegram, text, or email
5. Update lead folder with proposal URL and status

---

Workflow for Revisions

1. Edit the data arrays in the frontmatter (not the markup)
2. Commit with message: proposal({slug}): revise {what changed}
3. Vercel auto-deploys the update
4. Notify client: "I've updated the proposal — same link, refresh to see changes"
5. If major revision, bump the proposal number in the header

---

Branding & Styling Guidelines

Element	Value
Background (primary)	bg-bg-void (deepest dark)
Background (sections)	Alternate bg-bg-void and bg-bg-surface
Accent color (primary)	accent-cyan — headings, numbers, highlights
Accent color (success)	accent-green — launch dates, positive callouts
Accent color (warning)	accent-rose — alerts, gate errors
Typography (headings)	font-heading (bold, tight tracking)
Typography (labels)	font-mono text-xs uppercase tracking-[0.25em]
Typography (body)	text-text-secondary with leading-7 or leading-8
Cards	rounded-xl border border-border-default bg-bg-overlay p-5
Highlight boxes	rounded-xl border border-accent-cyan/30 bg-accent-cyan/10 p-4
Section spacing	py-24 md:py-32 between major sections
Max width	max-w-5xl mx-auto px-6 for content container

Animations

Add fade-in class to sections for scroll-triggered reveal. The site's global CSS handles the animation.

---

Integration with Leads Manager Skill

When a proposal is created:

1. Update data/projects/leads/{slug}/opportunity.md with:
   • Proposal URL
   • Pricing quoted
   • Date sent
   • Status: "proposal_sent"
2. Update data/projects/leads/_index.md pipeline stage
3. Create follow-up task via add_task:
   • Title: "Follow up with {client} on proposal"
   • Due: 2-3 business days after sending
   • Category: "errand"
   • Assignee: "hector"

---

Anti-Patterns (NEVER do these)

• ❌ Sending a PDF proposal — always use the hosted page
• ❌ Making proposals publicly accessible (no password gate)
• ❌ Using generic template sites (Canva, Notion, Google Docs) — {{PERSONAL_DOMAIN}} IS the brand
• ❌ Hardcoding content in HTML — always use data arrays in frontmatter
• ❌ Allowing search engine indexing of proposals
• ❌ Quoting prices without context/value framing ("Investment" section should sell the value first)
• ❌ Forgetting to update the lead folder after sending
• ❌ Creating proposals without a follow-up task

---

Checklist — Before Sending to Client

• Password gate works (test with correct + incorrect passwords)
• Mobile layout looks clean (test at 375px width)
• All links work (domain, external references)
• noindex, nofollow meta tag present
• Proposal number is unique and formatted correctly
• Investment section clearly states payment terms
• "What I Need From You" section has actionable items with links
• Terms section covers IP ownership, cancellation, and ongoing support
• Lead folder updated with proposal URL and pricing
• Follow-up task created