Skip to main content

planning

Software implementation planning with file-based persistence (task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md). Use when asked to "plan", "break down this feature", "implementation plan", or starting complex tasks needing >5 tool calls. Apply proactively before non-trivial coding.

Quellinformationen

Repository
iliaal/whetstone
Letzte Quellaktivität
27. Februar 2026 um 14:01
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
36
Forks
4

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
planning
description
Software implementation planning with file-based persistence (task_plan.md, findings.md, progress.md). Use when asked to "plan", "break down this feature", "implementation plan", or starting complex tasks needing >5 tool calls. Apply proactively before non-trivial coding.
# Planning ## Core Principle ``` Context window = RAM (volatile, limited) Filesystem = Disk (persistent, unlimited) → Anything important gets written to disk. ``` Planning tokens are cheaper than implementation tokens. Front-load thinking; scale effort to complexity. ## When to Plan - **Always plan**: multi-file changes, new features, refactors, >5 tool calls - **Skip planning**: single-file edits, quick lookups, simple questions ## Planning Files Create in project root before starting work: | File | Purpose | Update When | |------|---------|-------------| | `task_plan.md` | Phases, tasks, decisions, errors | After each phase | | `findings.md` | Research, discoveries, code analysis | After any discovery | | `progress.md` | Session log, test results, files changed | Throughout session | ## Plan Template ```markdown # Plan: [Feature/Task Name] ## Approach [1-3 sentences: what and why] ## Scope - **In**: [what's included] - **Out**: [what's explicitly excluded] ## Phase 1: [Name] **Files**: [specific files, max 5-8 per phase] **Tasks**: - [ ] [Verb-first atomic task] — `path/to/file.ts` - [ ] [Next task] **Verify**: [specific test: "POST /api/users → 201", not "test feature"] **Exit**: [clear done definition] ## Phase 2: [Name] ... ## Open Questions - [Max 3, only truly blocking unknowns] ``` ## Phase Sizing Rules Every phase must be **context-safe**: - Max 5-8 files touched - Max 2 dependencies on other phases - Fits in one 2-4 hour session (implementation + verification + fixes) - If a phase violates these → split it ## Clarifying Questions Scale to complexity: - Small task: 0-1 questions, assume reasonable defaults - Medium feature: 1-2 questions on critical unknowns - Large project: 3-5 questions (auth, data model, integrations, scope) Only ask if truly blocking. Make reasonable assumptions for everything else. ## Task Rules - **Atomic**: one logical unit of work per task - **Verb-first**: "Add...", "Create...", "Refactor...", "Verify..." - **Concrete**: name specific files, endpoints, components - **Ordered**: respect dependencies, sequential when needed - **Verifiable**: include at least one validation task per phase ## Context Management Rules | Situation | Action | |-----------|--------| | Starting new phase | Read task_plan.md (refresh goals in attention window) | | After any discovery | Write to findings.md immediately | | After completing phase | Update task_plan.md status, log to progress.md | | After viewing image/PDF | Write findings NOW (multimodal content doesn't persist) | | Resuming after gap | Read all planning files | | Just wrote a file | Don't re-read it (still in context) | | Error occurred | Log to task_plan.md, read relevant files for state | ## Error Protocol ``` ATTEMPT 1: Diagnose root cause → targeted fix ATTEMPT 2: Different approach (different tool, library, method) ATTEMPT 3: Question assumptions → search for solutions → update plan AFTER 3 FAILURES: Escalate to user with what you tried ``` **Never repeat the exact same failing action.** Track attempts, mutate approach. ## Iterative Refinement For complex projects, iterate on the plan before implementing: 1. Draft initial plan 2. Review for gaps, missing edge cases, architectural issues 3. Revise until suggestions become incremental 4. Only then start implementation ## 5-Question Context Check If you can answer these, your planning is solid: | Question | Source | |----------|--------| | Where am I? | Current phase in task_plan.md | | Where am I going? | Remaining phases | | What's the goal? | Approach section | | What have I learned? | findings.md | | What have I done? | progress.md | ## Anti-Patterns | Don't | Do Instead | |-------|------------| | Start coding without a plan | Create task_plan.md first | | State goals once and forget | Re-read plan before decisions | | Hide errors and retry silently | Log errors, mutate approach | | Keep everything in context | Write large content to files | | Repeat failed actions | Track attempts in plan file | | Create vague tasks ("improve X") | Concrete verb-first tasks with file paths | | Plan phases with 12+ files | Split into 5-8 file chunks | | Plan at 100% capacity | Budget for verification, fixes, and unknowns |
Auf GitHub ansehen