Skip to main content

debugging-protocol

Comprehensive protocol for validating root causes of software issues. Use when you need to systematically debug a complex bug, flaky test, or unknown system behavior by forming hypotheses and validating them with specific tasks.

Quellinformationen

Repository
irahardianto/qurio
Letzte Quellaktivität
26. Dezember 2025 um 03:52
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
16
Forks
5

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
debugging-protocol
description
Comprehensive protocol for validating root causes of software issues. Use when you need to systematically debug a complex bug, flaky test, or unknown system behavior by forming hypotheses and validating them with specific tasks.
# Debugging Protocol ## Overview This skill provides a rigorous framework for debugging complex software issues. It moves beyond ad-hoc troubleshooting to a structured process of hypothesis generation and validation. Use this skill to: 1. Formalize a debugging session. 2. Systematically eliminate potential root causes. 3. Document findings for future reference or team communication. ## Protocol Workflow To run a structured debugging session, follow these steps: ### 1. Initialize the Session Create a new debugging document using the provided template. This serves as the "source of truth" for the investigation. Template location: `assets/debugging-session-template.md` ### 2. Define the Problem Clearly articulate the **System Context** and **Problem Statement**. * **Symptom**: What is the observable behavior? How does it differ from expected behavior? * **Scope**: Which components are involved? ### 3. Formulate Hypotheses List distinct, testable hypotheses. * Avoid vague guesses. * Differentiate between layers (e.g., "Frontend Hypothesis" vs "Backend Hypothesis"). * Example: "Race condition in UI state update" vs "Database schema misconfiguration". ### 4. Design Validation Tasks For each hypothesis, design a specific validation task. * **Objective**: What are you trying to prove or disprove? * **Steps**: Precise, reproducible actions. * **Code Pattern**: Provide the exact code or command to run (e.g., a specific SQL query, a Python script using the client library, a `curl` command). * **Success Criteria**: Explicitly state what output confirms the hypothesis. ### 5. Execute and Document Run the tasks in order. For each task, record: * **Status**: ✅ VALIDATED, ❌ FAILED, or ⚠️ INCONCLUSIVE. * **Findings**: Key observations and raw evidence (logs, screenshots). * **Conclusion**: Does this support or refute the hypothesis? ### 6. Determine Root Cause Synthesize the findings into a **Root Cause Analysis**. * Identify the Primary Root Cause. * Assign a Confidence Level. * Propose specific fixes. ## Best Practices * **Be Specific**: Don't just say "check the logs." Say "grep for 'Error 500' in `/var/log/nginx/access.log`". * **Isolate Variables**: Change one thing at a time. * **Validate Assumptions**: Verify configuration and versions first (e.g., "Task 1: Validate Current Schema"). * **Preserve Evidence**: Keep the specific trace IDs, log timestamps, or reproduction scripts.
Auf GitHub ansehen