Skip to main content

merge-queue

Process open PRs — merge when CI passes, handle rebases, file issues for failures. Run in a dedicated window.

Quellinformationen

Repository
jdelfino/devcontainer-template
Letzte Quellaktivität
24. Februar 2026 um 16:38
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
0
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
merge-queue
description
Process open PRs — merge when CI passes, handle rebases, file issues for failures. Run in a dedicated window.
# Merge Queue Process all open PRs. Merge what's ready, rebase what's behind, file issues for failures. Run this in a dedicated terminal window. Invoke periodically with `/merge` while other windows do `/work`. ## Step 1: Scan ```bash # Check CI status on main — failing main blocks the entire queue gh run list --branch main --limit 1 --json status,conclusion # List open PRs gh pr list --json number,title,headRefName,statusCheckRollup,mergeable,body,reviewRequests,reviews ``` **If main CI is failing:** file a P0 beads issue (if one doesn't already exist), report prominently, and stop. Nothing can merge until main is green. ```bash bd create "CI failing on main: <summary>" -t bug -p 0 --json ``` ## Step 2: Categorize For each PR, determine its state: | State | Action | |-------|--------| | CI passing, mergeable, no pending review | Merge | | CI passing, mergeable, review requested but not approved | Skip, report | | CI passing, mergeable, review approved | Merge | | CI pending | Skip, report status | | CI failing | File issue, report | | Not mergeable (behind main) | Attempt rebase | ## Step 3: Decide Merge Order When multiple PRs are ready, use judgment to balance: - **Impact**: prefer merging high-impact features first - **Merge conflict risk**: larger changes sitting unmerged cause more conflicts for other PRs - **Goal**: keep changes flowing. Don't always defer large changes — that makes the conflict problem worse ## Step 4: Choose Merge Strategy Before merging each PR, inspect its commits to decide how to merge: ```bash gh pr view <number> --json commits --jq '.commits[] | "\(.oid[:8]) \(.messageHeadline)"' ``` Pick one of three strategies: | Strategy | When to use | Command | |----------|-------------|---------| | **Squash** | All commits serve a single logical change, OR commits are messy/WIP (fixups, "wip", "try again", etc.) | `gh pr merge <number> --squash` | | **Merge** | Commits represent distinct, well-structured concerns (e.g. "add handler" + "add tests" + "update docs") that are valuable to preserve individually | `gh pr merge <number> --merge` | | **Rebase cleanup** | Commits mix good structure with noise — some are worth preserving but others should be squashed together. **Use sparingly** — only when clearly beneficial. | Rebase in worktree, force-push, wait for CI, then `gh pr merge <number> --merge` | **Decision guide:** 1. **Single commit?** Always squash (no difference, but squash keeps PR link in message). 2. **Multiple commits, single feature?** Squash. Example: "implement login" + "fix lint" + "address review" → squash. 3. **Multiple commits, distinct concerns, clean messages?** Merge. Example: "add practice mode handler" + "add rate limiting middleware" + "enable practice UI in student page" → merge. 4. **Mixed quality?** If 1-2 WIP commits pollute an otherwise clean history, rebase to clean up, then merge. If it's mostly noise, just squash. **When in doubt, squash.** A clean single commit is always better than a messy multi-commit history. ## Step 5: Merge For each mergeable PR (in priority order), using the chosen strategy: ```bash gh pr merge <number> --squash|--merge # per Step 4 ``` **After each merge:** 1. Parse beads issue IDs from PR body (look for `Beads: id1, id2` line) 2. Close each: ```bash bd close <id> --reason "Merged in PR #<number>" --json ``` 3. Remove worktree if it exists: ```bash git worktree remove ../<project>-<branch-name> 2>/dev/null ``` 4. Delete feature branch: ```bash git branch -d feature/<branch-name> 2>/dev/null ``` 5. Pull main: ```bash git pull origin main ``` **Important:** after each merge, re-check remaining PRs — merging one PR may make others unmergeable (need rebase) or may resolve conflicts. ## Step 6: Handle Rebases When a PR is not mergeable (behind main): ```bash git fetch origin main # Use existing worktree if present, otherwise create one cd <existing-worktree> # or: git worktree add ../<project>-rebase-<number> <branch> git rebase origin/main ``` - **Clean rebase:** force-push, then **wait for CI to finish and merge** (see below). ```bash git push --force-with-lease ``` - **Trivial conflict:** resolve inline if the conflict is mechanical — e.g. adjacent line edits, import ordering, lock file regeneration, or both sides adding to the same list. After resolving, `git add` the files, `git rebase --continue`, and force-push. **Always include a conflict summary in the report:** ``` Resolved 2 conflicts during rebase of PR #18: - go-backend/internal/server/server.go: adjacent route additions (kept both) - frontend/package-lock.json: regenerated ``` - **Non-trivial conflict:** file a beads issue describing the conflict, which files are affected, and what makes it non-trivial (semantic overlap, structural disagreement, etc.). Do not attempt to resolve. Report to user. After rebase, clean up any temporary worktree created for the rebase. **After a clean rebase, poll CI and merge when it passes.** Don't just report "rebased, CI re-running" and stop — unmerged PRs accumulate conflicts. Poll every 60 seconds until CI completes: ```bash # Poll until all checks finish gh pr checks <number> --watch # Then merge (using strategy from Step 4) gh pr merge <number> --squash|--merge ``` If CI fails after the rebase, follow Step 7 (file an issue). But if it passes, merge immediately — don't wait for the user to re-run `/merge`. ## Step 7: Handle CI Failures **Test failures are real. Never rerun. Never ignore.** When CI fails on a PR: 1. Fetch failure logs: ```bash gh pr checks <number> gh run view <run-id> --log-failed ``` 2. File a beads issue with: - The failure details (which test, error message) - PR reference - Priority based on severity ```bash bd create "CI failure on PR #<number>: <summary>" -t bug -p 1 --json ``` 3. Report to user with the beads issue ID ## Step 8: Report Summary After processing all PRs, output a summary: ``` Merge Queue Summary: - PR #12: Merged (closed bd-abc, bd-def) - PR #15: CI passing, awaiting your review - PR #18: Rebased, CI re-running - PR #20: CI failing — filed bd-xyz - PR #22: CI pending (2/3 checks done) Action needed: - bd-xyz: Test failure on PR #20, needs /work bd-xyz - PR #15: Awaiting your review on GitHub ``` Always include beads issue IDs so the user can dispatch `/work` for fixes. If there are no open PRs, report "No open PRs." ## What This Agent Does NOT Do - Write code or fix test failures (file issues for `/work` instead) - Resolve merge conflicts (file issues instead) - Rerun failed CI (test failures are real) - Close beads issues without a successful merge - Merge PRs with pending review requests
Auf GitHub ansehen