JuliusBrussee

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts output tokens 65% (measured) by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts output tokens 65% (measured) by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

Compress natural language memory files (CLAUDE.md, todos, preferences) into caveman format to save input tokens. Preserves all technical substance, code, URLs, and structure. Compressed version overwrites the original file. Human-readable backup saved as FILE.original.md. Trigger: /caveman-compress FILEPATH or "compress memory file"

Compress natural language memory files (CLAUDE.md, todos, preferences) into caveman format to save input tokens. Preserves all technical substance, code, URLs, and structure. Compressed version overwrites the original file. Human-readable backup saved as FILE.original.md. Trigger: /caveman-compress FILEPATH or "compress memory file"

Decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents. Tells the main thread WHEN to spawn `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder` (1-2 file edit), or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of doing the work inline or using vanilla `Explore`. Subagent output is caveman-compressed so the tool-result injected back into main context is ~60% smaller — main context lasts longer across long sessions. Trigger: "delegate to subagent", "use cavecrew", "spawn investigator/builder/reviewer", "save context", "compressed agent output".

Ultra-compressed commit message generator. Cuts noise from commit messages while preserving intent and reasoning. Conventional Commits format. Subject ≤50 chars, body only when "why" isn't obvious. Use when user says "write a commit", "commit message", "generate commit", "/commit", or invokes /caveman-commit. Auto-triggers when staging changes.

Quick-reference card for all caveman modes, skills, and commands. One-shot display, not a persistent mode. Trigger: /caveman-help, "caveman help", "what caveman commands", "how do I use caveman".

Ultra-compressed code review comments. Cuts noise from PR feedback while preserving the actionable signal. Each comment is one line: location, problem, fix. Use when user says "review this PR", "code review", "review the diff", "/review", or invokes /caveman-review. Auto-triggers when reviewing pull requests.

Plan-then-execute implementation against SPEC.md. Native single-thread loop, no sub-agents. On test or build failure, auto-invokes the backprop skill before retrying — a failed verification always considers whether a new §V invariant would prevent recurrence. Triggers when the user asks to build, implement, execute the spec, or tackle a specific §T task (`build §T.3`, `build --next`, `implement next task`, `run the build`). Expects SPEC.md to exist; if not, defers to the spec skill.

Read-only drift detector. Diffs SPEC.md against current code and reports violations grouped by severity. Writes nothing — suggests remedies via the spec or build skills but never invokes them. Triggers when the user asks to check drift, audit the spec, verify invariants, or ask whether code still matches the spec. Phrasings: "check drift", "audit the spec", "does the code still match §V", "check invariants", "spec vs code".

Optional design-improvement pass for when you have spare usage to drain. Finds the shallowest modules in the code the spec touches, researches a deeper design, and proposes refactors that shrink interfaces and hide decisions — behavior held constant, tests green before and after. Proposes §I/§V/§T edits, never silent rewrites. Triggers when the user says "deepen this", "improve the design", "this module feels shallow", "pull complexity down", "use spare budget on the codebase", or invokes /ck:deepen. Leans on the codebase-design skill's deep-module vocabulary when present.

Calibrated interrogation of a fuzzy idea before it becomes a spec. Asks one question at a time, recommends an answer, and lands each answer in §G (goal) or §C (constraints) — unknowns parked as `?` items, never guessed. The cheapest place to kill a bad idea is before §T exists. Triggers when the user has a vague idea, says "grill me", "stress-test this", "challenge my plan", "interview me before I spec", or invokes /ck:grill. Defers the actual write to the spec skill.

Gather external knowledge the spec needs and distill it into §R — the durable research log — so build grounds in facts instead of hallucinating library behavior. Each finding cites a source; unsourced claims are flagged, never written as fact. Triggers when a spec decision hinges on a library/API/best practice the agent is unsure of, when the user says "research this", "what's the best lib for…", "check current best practice", or invokes /ck:research. Defers the §R write to the spec skill.

Adversarial senior review of the spec before any code is written. Constructs a skeptical reviewer whose authority comes from the codebase, §R research, and live best-practice — then tries to REFUTE the spec, not rubber-stamp it. Every finding cites evidence (file:line or source); unverifiable ones are flagged. Survivors harden §V; the run ends in an explicit go / no-go gate. Triggers before building anything high-blast-radius, when the user says "review the spec", "red-team this", "is this plan sound", "senior review", or invokes /ck:review.

Create, amend, or backprop bugs into SPEC.md at repo root. Sole mutator of the project spec. Triggers when the user asks to write a spec, start a new spec, distill a spec from existing code, add invariants, amend sections (§G, §C, §I, §V, §T, §B), or record a bug via backprop. Common phrasings: "write the spec for...", "new spec", "bug: ...", "amend §V.3", "distill spec from code", "spec this idea". Reads and follows FORMAT.md for the caveman encoding rules and pipe-table shape of §T and §B.

Bug → spec protocol. When a bug is found or a test fails, trace the cause, decide whether a new §V invariant would catch recurrence, append to §B. This is the one non-obvious thing SDD does that plan-then-execute doesn't. Triggers on test failure, bug report, post-mortem, or explicit user ask.

Example skill loaded from resources_discover

Scaffold a complete cave plugin bundle — generates .cave-plugin/plugin.json manifest and the standard directory structure (commands/, skills/, agents/, themes/, hooks/). Use when a user wants to create, publish, or package a cave plugin for the marketplace. Triggered by "create a plugin", "scaffold a plugin", "/plugin create", or "new cave plugin".

How to write and maintain DESIGN.md as the visual specification layer for Cavekit projects. Nine-section format, design tokens, accessibility, integration with kits/plans. Use when defining or revising visual identity, importing a third-party design system, or auditing UI code against design tokens.

Cavekit specification-driven development methodology — the Hunt lifecycle (Draft → Architect → Build → Inspect → Monitor) and how to apply it. Use when starting a Cavekit project, structuring an existing codebase as kits/plans, or routing between sub-skills.

Trace bugs and manual fixes back to kits and prompts; fix at the source so the iteration loop can reproduce the fix autonomously. Six-step revision process plus the single-failure backpropagation protocol. Use when a manual hot-fix has been applied, when convergence stalls, or when the same class of bug keeps reappearing.

Validation-first design for Cavekit — every kit requirement must be automatically verifiable. Six-gate validation pipeline, phase gates, merge protocol, completion signals, acceptance criteria patterns. Use when designing acceptance criteria, wiring CI gates, or debugging why an agent is producing output that nobody can verify.

Ultra-compressed communication mode (lite / full / ultra) that cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Use when the user requests "caveman mode", "less tokens", "be brief", or when output budget is tight.

Finds and finishes the last 20% of a built solution — the experiential layer agents skip: what the output actually reads like, which pages or screens should exist, first-run and empty states, opinionated defaults, the golden path. Use when planning any build so the magic gets specced as concretely as the plumbing, before calling any build "done", when a solution works but feels like a demo, or when the user says "last 20%", "finish this", "make it actually good", "is this actually done", or "why does this feel flat".

Install a per-turn canary signal (e.g. starting every reply with the user's name and a turn counter) so silent context degradation becomes visible the moment it happens, and run a recovery protocol when the canary trips. Use when the user mentions a "canary", "context canary", or "canary check", asks to detect context rot / compaction / drift, says "you stopped using my name" or "did you lose context", asks "how degraded is your context", or wants an early-warning system for long agent sessions.

De-slop pass for any text: detects and erases the statistical fingerprints of AI writing (negative parallelism / "not X but Y", em-dash abuse, rule-of-three, false ranges, puffery vocabulary, uniform cadence, hedged both-sidesing) and rewrites the text into its target register — academic article, tweet, reddit post, email, blog, anything between. Use when the user says "fuck slop", "f*ck slop", "deslop", "de-slop this", "remove the AI tells", "humanize this", "make this not sound like AI", or invokes /fuck-slop. Also use before publishing any agent-drafted prose.

Adversarial senior-engineer review for agent-generated plans, designs, and architectures. Treats the current output as junior work, constructs a senior reviewer whose domain expertise comes from live codebase research plus web research of current best practices, diagnoses altitude failures (too vague or too granular), then rewrites the plan into a scoped, state-of-the-art version. Use when the user says "junior to senior", "senior review", "review this like a staff engineer", when a plan feels hand-wavy or lost in details, or before committing to any agent-written plan.

Authoritative guide for implementing stunning, accessible, performant UI. Synthesizes design engineering philosophy, accessibility standards, animation principles, spatial design, typography, color systems, and component craft into a single actionable reference. Complements the design-system skill (which covers DESIGN.md spec writing) by covering the HOW of implementation. Trigger phrases: "build UI", "create component", "landing page", "make it look good", "frontend", "design", "polish UI", "implement design", "make it beautiful", "UI implementation", "component styling", "animation", "accessibility"

Run a spec-driven agent loop where coding tasks live as markdown specs that move through inbox → active → archive, get implemented by Claude Code or Codex, and pass a review gate before they count as done. Use when the user mentions "loop factory", a "spec-driven loop", an "agent factory", wants repeatable/reviewable agent work, or when a repo has a factory/specs/inbox or factory/specs/active directory. Also covers installing and scaffolding the loop-factory CLI into a project.

Calibrated grilling session for stress-testing a plan, design, idea, or decision. First assesses the user's topic knowledge, confidence, and desired pressure level, then asks one question at a time with recommended answers. Use when user says "grill me", "stress-test this", "challenge my plan", "interview me", or wants a plan probed without being overwhelmed.

Use when orchestrating Loop Factory specs from factory/specs/inbox or factory/specs/active, dispatching work to Codex or Claude agents, generating implementation prompts, or deciding next loop state.

Use when orchestrating Loop Factory specs from factory/specs/inbox or factory/specs/active, dispatching work, generating implementation prompts, or deciding next loop state.

Use when code changes should be scanned and reflected back into living specs, docs, or architecture notes without changing product intent.

Use when reviewing active Loop Factory specs against the working tree, checking verification evidence, deciding ACCEPTED or CHANGES_REQUESTED, and archiving accepted specs.

Use when code changes should be scanned and reflected back into living specs, docs, or architecture notes without changing product intent.

Use when reviewing active Loop Factory specs against the working tree, checking verification evidence, deciding ACCEPTED or CHANGES_REQUESTED, and archiving accepted specs.