Menü
pnpm + Nix build conventions. Covers fetchPnpmDeps hash management and dependency workflow.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Basierend auf der SOC-Berufsklassifikation
| name | nix-typescript |
| description | pnpm + Nix build conventions. Covers fetchPnpmDeps hash management and dependency workflow. |
| user-invocable | false |
nix/modules/typescript.nix uses fetchPnpmDeps with a pinned hash. When pnpm-lock.yaml changes (via pnpm add/remove/update), this hash goes stale and nix build fails.
nix build 2>&1 — it fails with a hash mismatchgot: sha256-... line in the errorhash = "sha256-..." line in nix/modules/typescript.nixRun the hash fix in background immediately after pnpm-lock.yaml changes. Don't wait until end of session — kick it off as soon as the lock file is modified, then continue coding. The nix build takes minutes; doing it in background avoids blocking other work.
nix build — full production build (client + server bundle)nix run — build and runpnpm --filter kolu-client build (Vite)tsx (TypeScript execution without compile step)Drive one AI agent from another through kolu's terminals: spawn a Claude Code / Codex / opencode session in a PTY, prompt it, watch the screen for its reply, read it, and prompt again. PRIMARY PATH: the kolu MCP server's tools (`lifecycle_create`/`lifecycle_sendInput` with named keys, the `wait_outputSettled`/`wait_agentState` done-signals, `screen_text`, the `terminals` resource) — configured in this repo's .mcp.json as `kolu mcp`. FALLBACK when the MCP is unavailable: the `kaval-tui`/`padi-tui` CLIs, same verbs, same discipline. Triggers on "drive another agent", "send a prompt to a terminal agent", "have one agent prompt another", "agent drives agent", "orchestrate agents in terminals", "make Claude drive Codex", "prompt the agent running in that terminal", or wiring a loop where one coding agent supervises another.
Running memory of the coordination rules for an orchestrator agent driving implementing agents on kolu terminals — authorization boundaries, the dispatch protocol (MCP-first via the kolu skill, with its TUI fallback), verification discipline, and how to communicate with the human. Load whenever coordinating a multi-agent campaign (dispatching briefs to agents in kolu PTYs, tracking their PRs, verifying their claims), or when acting as the coordinator in a padi/surface-style campaign. Triggers on "orchestrate the agents", "coordinate the campaign", "dispatch to the agents", "act as coordinator", or driving multiple implementing agents from one supervising session.
Running memory of the coordination rules for an orchestrator agent driving implementing agents on kolu terminals — authorization boundaries, the dispatch protocol (MCP-first via the kolu skill, with its TUI fallback), verification discipline, and how to communicate with the human. Load whenever coordinating a multi-agent campaign (dispatching briefs to agents in kolu PTYs, tracking their PRs, verifying their claims), or when acting as the coordinator in a padi/surface-style campaign. Triggers on "orchestrate the agents", "coordinate the campaign", "dispatch to the agents", "act as coordinator", or driving multiple implementing agents from one supervising session.
Modern, interactive alternative to `/do` — clarify intent up front, then take a task end-to-end with a serial AI review gauntlet (lens debate (lowy ⇄ hickey) → codex debate → simplify → code-police, each editing the branch in turn) → CI → evidence. ONLY invoke when the user explicitly types `/be` or `$be`; never auto-select from a natural-language request.
Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex critiques the current diff and Claude (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree, and the trail is committed + posted to the PR. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. The debate runs over a LIVE codex session in a split terminal beside you (driven per the /kolu skill), not a headless workflow. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".
Run an automated codex⇄Claude debate to consensus — no round cap, no deadlock exit. Two explicit subcommands. `review` (also the bare/back-compat default) — codex critiques the current diff and Claude (author) fixes/disputes, looping until they agree, and the trail is committed + posted to the PR. `answer` — Claude and codex each answer a freeform prompt, then cross-check until they agree, and a unified answer is returned. The debate runs over a LIVE codex session in a split terminal beside you (driven per the /kolu skill), not a headless workflow. Use when the user types `/codex-debate`, asks to "have codex review this", "run the codex debate", "review this PR with codex", "argue this with codex until you agree", or passes a question to "have Claude and codex debate/answer until they agree".