| name | pacgate-redesign |
| description | Audit and upgrade existing Pacgate pages without broad rewrites. Use for redesigning proposal pages, docs HTML, bilingual business materials, or temporary workboards while preserving structure, links, and commercial meaning. |
| argument-hint | Describe the existing page or file, whether the redesign should preserve or overhaul the current visual language, and what must not change. |
| user-invocable | true |
Pacgate Redesign
Use this skill when the task is to improve an existing Pacgate page or document surface rather than create a brand-new one.
Core Principle
Audit first. Preserve what carries business value. Improve what is weak. Do not turn a focused redesign into a framework rewrite or a different product story.
Modes
Pick one mode before editing:
Preserve - keep the existing page language and structure, improve hierarchy and polish
Overhaul - keep the content purpose, but substantially recompose the page
Workbench - build or refine a temporary board-like surface for ongoing internal or client-facing clarification work
If the correct mode is unclear and the choice would materially change the work, ask one question.
Audit Checklist
Before changing the page, document the current state in these categories:
Structure
- page purpose
- target audience
- language toggle or bilingual structure
- section order and major navigation paths
- internal links and proposal cross-links that must stay stable
Design
- current palette and accent logic
- type scale and readability issues
- repeated layout families or generic card patterns
- contrast, spacing, rhythm, and scanability issues
- motion or JavaScript behavior that should be preserved, simplified, or removed
Business Content
- scope statements that must remain precise
- commercial details that must not drift
- claims that are too vague, too strong, or too generic
- temporary versus committed surfaces
What Must Not Change Silently
- public file names, routes, or stable links
- bilingual wrapper structure on mirrored pages
- commercial meaning, payment logic, or proposal scope intent
- language toggle behavior
- the separation between temporary Q&A materials and the public proposal entry flow
Fix Priority
Apply changes in this order unless the task says otherwise:
- Clarify the page purpose and section hierarchy.
- Fix typography, spacing, and scanability.
- Remove generic AI patterns and visual clutter.
- Tighten copy so it reads like a serious business artifact.
- Improve visual grouping, comparison blocks, and call-to-action clarity.
- Add or refine motion only if it has a real communicative role.
Hard Rules
- Work with the existing stack first. For docs pages, that means static HTML, CSS, and light JavaScript.
- Do not migrate to a new framework as part of a redesign unless the user explicitly asks for that migration.
- Keep diffs reviewable and local.
- Do not rewrite proposal content just to make it sound more "designed".
- Do not introduce decorative labels, fake status metadata, or filler stats.
Procedure
- Determine redesign mode.
- Audit the current page under the checklist above.
- Separate "preserve", "retire", and "upgrade" elements.
- Make the smallest high-leverage layout and copy changes first.
- Validate the touched slice immediately.
- Re-check links, bilingual parity, and business meaning before finishing.
Red Flags
Stop and reassess if any of these appear:
- the redesign starts changing the product story instead of the page quality
- a temporary workboard begins to look like committed public scope
- EN and ZH stop matching after layout edits
- the page becomes more stylish but less readable or less export-friendly
- the redesign requires many unrelated file changes to feel complete
Done Criteria
- The page reads more clearly and looks more intentional.
- The redesign stays inside the current stack and business framing.
- Stable links, toggles, and mirrored language blocks still work.
- The result looks like Pacgate material, not a generic AI-generated redesign.