Facilitate a structured sprint or project retrospective. Outputs a meeting agenda, facilitation guide, synthesis framework, and action item tracker that drives real improvement.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Facilitate a structured sprint or project retrospective. Outputs a meeting agenda, facilitation guide, synthesis framework, and action item tracker that drives real improvement.
A retrospective is only valuable if it produces real change. Most retros fail because they identify problems but not root causes, or they generate action items that nobody follows up on. This facilitates a retro that surfaces genuine issues, reaches shared understanding, and produces committed improvements.
Process
Set the stage — create psychological safety before diving into problems.
Gather data — surface what actually happened, not just what people feel.
Generate insights — move from symptoms to root causes.
Decide what to do — prioritize and commit to specific changes.
Close the loop — check on last retro's actions before starting the next cycle.
Facilitation Guide
Before the retro (15–30 min prep)
Gather data from the sprint:
Velocity vs. planned
Stories completed, carried over, and abandoned
Bug and incident count
Customer escalations
Team satisfaction pulse (anonymous survey if available)
Review last retro's action items:
Which were done?
Which were started?
Which were not started? Why?
Set up the board:
Columns: "What went well?" / "What could be better?" / "What puzzles us?" / "Action items"
Timer for each section
Voting dots ready
Meeting Structure
# Retrospective: [Sprint/Project Name]**Date:** [Date]
**Facilitator:** [Name]
**Team:** [Names]
**Duration:** [60–90 minutes]
**Format:** [In-person / Remote — Miro / FigJam / Retro tool]
---
## Agenda
| Time | Activity | Owner | Purpose |
|------|----------|-------|---------|
| 0:00 | Check-in + safety check | Facilitator | Build trust |
| 0:05 | Review last retro actions | PM | Accountability |
| 0:15 | Data review: sprint stats | PM | Shared context |
| 0:20 | Individual writing (silent) | Everyone | Generate honest input |
| 0:30 | Grouping and discussion | Everyone | Identify themes |
| 0:50 | Prioritize themes | Everyone | Dot vote |
| 0:55 | Root cause analysis | Team | Go deeper |
| 1:10 | Action items | Team | Commit to change |
| 1:25 | Close + appreciation | Facilitator | End positively |
---
## Check-In (5 min)*Purpose: build psychological safety before critical discussion***Prompt (choose one):**- "In one word, how are you coming into this retro?"
- "On a scale of 1–5, how was this sprint for you personally? Why?"
- "What is one thing that happened this sprint you are proud of?"
*The facilitator goes first to model openness.*
---
## Last Retro Review (10 min)*Review each action item from the last retro. Be honest about what happened.*
| Action | Owner | Status | Notes |
|--------|-------|--------|-------|
| [Action from last retro] | [Name] | ✅ Done / 🔄 In progress / ❌ Not done | [What happened] |
**Facilitator prompt:** "For anything not done — what got in the way? Is it still worth doing?"
---
## Sprint Data Review (5 min)*Review facts before opinions. Shared context prevents argument about basic facts later.*- Stories planned: [N]
- Stories completed: [N] ([X%])
- Stories carried over: [N] — [themes if any]
- Incidents/bugs: [N]
- Unplanned work: [estimate of %]
**Facilitator prompt:** "Does anything in this data surprise you?"
---
## Reflection: Individual Writing (10 min, silent)
"What do you want to make sure we keep doing? What worked? What should we be proud of?"
"What slowed us down? What frustrated you? What would you change if you could?"
"What do you not understand? What feels like a symptom of something deeper?"
---
Each person reads their items aloud (one at a time). Facilitator groups duplicates.
Facilitator reads back the groups to confirm accuracy.
Team discusses themes —
"Can you say more about what happened there?"
"Did anyone else experience this?"
"Is this new, or does it recur?"
"What do you think caused this?"
---
Each person gets 3 dots to place on the items they think are most important to address.
"We will focus our action items on the top [2–3] themes."
---
"Why did [problem] happen?" → [Answer]
"Why did [answer] happen?" → [Answer]
"Why..." → Continue until you reach a systemic or process cause
What contributed to this from: Process / People / Tools / Communication / Environment?
Problem: "Stories were carried over every sprint"
Why? "Stories were too large"
Why? "We did not break them down in planning"
Why? "Planning meetings end before we finish grooming"
Why? "Planning is scheduled for 1 hour but always takes 2"
Root cause:
---
| Action | Owner | By when | How we will know it is done |
|--------|-------|---------|---------------------------|
| [Specific action] | [Single name] | [Date or next sprint] | [Observable outcome] |
Every action gets a single owner — not "the team"
Actions must be completable in the next sprint or 2 weeks maximum
"Discuss" is not an action; it is a meeting. Schedule it with a date.
Start with the highest-voted themes
"Engineering lead will extend sprint planning to 2 hours starting next sprint"
"Team will communicate better"
---
Each person names one thing another team member did well this sprint.
"Thank you everyone. I will send the notes and action items within 24 hours."
---
Send to the team:
Retro Summary — [Sprint/Date]
Top themes
[Theme] — root cause: [cause]
[Theme] — root cause: [cause]
Action items
Action
Owner
By when
[Action]
[Name]
[Date]
What we keep doing
[From "went well" section]
See full retro board: [link]
Retro Format Variations
Format
Good for
Duration
Start / Stop / Continue
Quick, focused teams
45 min
What went well / What to improve
Standard, beginner teams
60 min
Mad / Sad / Glad
Teams needing emotional check-in
60 min
4Ls (Liked, Learned, Lacked, Longed for)
Project retrospectives
75 min
Sailboat (wind, anchor, rocks)
Strategic retrospectives
90 min
Timeline retro
Complex sprints with many events
90 min
Common Retro Failure Modes
Failure
Cause
Fix
Same problems every sprint
Action items not followed up
Review last retro actions first, always
Only negatives discussed
No structured "went well" section
Protect time for positives
Loud voices dominate
No structured input collection
Silent writing before discussion
Action items never done
No single owner, no deadline
One owner per action, specific date
Nobody speaks honestly
Psychological safety absent
Check-in, emphasize no blame culture
Retro runs over time
No timeboxing
Use a visible timer; cut if needed
Rules
Review last retro's actions first — without accountability, action items are theater.
Silent individual writing before discussion — prevents groupthink and ensures introverts contribute.
Dot voting prioritizes democratically — the loudest person does not set the agenda.
Root cause before solution — jumping to solutions prevents teams from fixing the real problem.
One owner per action item — "team will do X" means nobody does X.
Actions completable in one sprint — long-term actions get deferred; short-term actions get done.
Facilitator does not dominate — if you are PM and facilitating, stay neutral; do not advocate for your own items.
End positively — appreciation rounds are not soft; they counterbalance the critical discussion.
Send notes within 24 hours — action items lose momentum after 48 hours.
Measure improvement — if a retro does not change anything, it is a waste of everyone's time.
*Everyone writes simultaneously — prevents groupthink and ensures all voices are heard.*
**Prompt for each column:**
**🟢 What went well?**
**🔴 What could be better?**
**❓ What puzzles us?**
*Facilitator: set a timer for 8 minutes. Silence is productive — do not rush.*
## Discussion and Grouping (20 min)
**Step 1:**
**Step 2:**
**Step 3:**
*not solutions yet, only understanding.*
**Facilitator prompts:**
-
-
-
-
## Prioritize (5 min)
**Dot voting:**
**Facilitator:**
*Note: voting prevents the loudest voice from determining what gets addressed.*
## Root Cause Analysis (15 min)
*For each prioritized theme, go deeper. Do not jump to solutions.*
**For each top-voted item, ask:**
**5 Whys technique:**
1.
2.
3.
**Alternative: Fishbone / Ishikawa**
-
**Example:**
-
-
-
-
-
-
**Planning time is insufficient; we need 2-hour planning slots**
*The root cause is the one you can actually act on.*
## Action Items (15 min)
*The most important part. Actions must be specific, owned, and time-bound.*
**For each root cause identified, define:**
**Facilitator rules:**
-
-
-
-
**Good action:**
**Bad action:**
## Closing + Appreciation (5 min)
*End on a positive note. Retros that end on problems leave teams demoralized.*
