Skip to main content

audit-code-quality

Detect and fix repo-wide anti-patterns and consistency drift (naming, organisation, repeated smells). Use when "code smell", "anti-pattern", "technical debt", or "standardize the codebase". This PR/diff review → audit-code-review.

Quellinformationen

Repository
kensaurus/skills
Letzte Quellaktivität
23. September 2026 um 10:42
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
8
Forks
1

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
audit-code-quality
description
Detect and fix repo-wide anti-patterns and consistency drift (naming, organisation, repeated smells). Use when "code smell", "anti-pattern", "technical debt", or "standardize the codebase". This PR/diff review → audit-code-review.
license
MIT
effort
high
# Code Quality Audit **Degree of freedom: MIXED** — Parts 1–2 judgment `[HIGH freedom]`; convention greps and Validation `[LOW freedom — run exactly]`. > **Audit-and-fix exception.** Detect and then fix. Not present-then-stop. > > Fix the findings you reported, in the files you named; a repo-wide restyle > or rename pass the report did not list is a different session. Edit > surgically — the offending hook, key, or import — rather than rewriting > whole files. Pre-existing bugs met on the way go in the report as > follow-ups. Add or change tests only where the task asks or the repo > already keeps them for that surface; one-off greps and scratch scripts stay > out of the commit. Repo-wide React/TypeScript anti-patterns plus naming, organisation, and pattern consistency. A named PR/diff → `audit-code-review`. ## How to reason 1. **Observe** — quote the smell (`file:line`) and whether `git blame` / CONTRIBUTING marks it intentional 2. **Interpret** — bug/perf risk, or style-only drift? 3. **Classify** — anti-pattern / naming / organisation / pattern-split / intentional 4. **Severity** — runtime bug or data-fetch `useEffect` = High; naming-only = Low ## Worked example > **Observe:** `components/PaymentForm.tsx` has `'use server'` and a > `useEffect` that fetches invoices; four sortable lists use `key={i}`. > **Interpret:** server action lives in UI; fetch refires on remount; reorder remounts rows. > **Classify:** organisation + `useEffect`-for-data + index-as-key. > **Severity:** High (actions-in-components); Medium (keys). > **Finding:** `PaymentForm.tsx` | High | move action to `features/*/server/`; > replace fetch effect with TanStack Query ## Before any change [LOW freedom — run exactly] ```bash cat CONTRIBUTING.md .cursor/rules/*.md 2>/dev/null | head -100 # existing conventions git log --oneline -20 | grep -i "convention\|pattern\|style" # recent decisions ``` Verify the "inconsistency" isn't intentional. Check `git blame` before touching working code. --- ## Part 1 — Anti-patterns [HIGH freedom] ### React #### Props drilling → Context or composition ```tsx // Bad: prop drilled through 5+ levels <Layout user={user}><Sidebar user={user}><UserMenu user={user}><Avatar user={user} /> // Fix: context for global state const UserContext = createContext<User | null>(null) const useUser = () => useContext(UserContext) // Fix: composition for UI concerns <Layout><Layout.Sidebar><UserMenu /></Layout.Sidebar></Layout> ``` #### Derived state in `useState` → `useMemo` ```tsx // Bad const [items, setItems] = useState([]) const [filtered, setFiltered] = useState([]) useEffect(() => { setFiltered(items.filter(i => i.active)) }, [items]) // Fix const filtered = useMemo(() => items.filter(i => i.active), [items]) ``` #### `useEffect` for data fetching → Server Components or TanStack Query ```tsx // Fix (Next.js 16 Server Component) async function DataDisplay() { const data = await db.getData() return <div>{data.name}</div> } // Fix (client with TanStack Query) const { data, isLoading } = useQuery({ queryKey: ['data'], queryFn: fetchData }) ``` #### Object/array in dependency array → memoize or destructure ```tsx // Bad: new object every render → infinite loop useEffect(() => { doSomething(options) }, [options]) // Fix const options = useMemo(() => ({ page, limit }), [page, limit]) useEffect(() => { doSomething(options) }, [options]) ``` #### Index as key in dynamic lists → stable IDs ```tsx // Bad {items.map((item, i) => <Item key={i} />)} // Fix {items.map(item => <Item key={item.id} />)} ``` #### Giant component → composition ```tsx // Split by responsibility export function UserDashboard() { const user = useUser() return ( <DashboardLayout> <UserHeader user={user} /> <UserStats userId={user.id} /> <RecentActivity userId={user.id} /> </DashboardLayout> ) } ``` ### TypeScript ```tsx // Bad: any function processData(data: any) { return data.items.map((i: any) => i.name) } // Fix: proper types + Zod validation const DataSchema = z.object({ items: z.array(z.object({ id: z.string(), name: z.string() })) }) function processData(data: z.infer<typeof DataSchema>) { return data.items.map(i => i.name) } // Bad: enums (runtime object, not tree-shakeable) enum Status { Pending = 'pending', Active = 'active' } // Fix: union types type Status = 'pending' | 'active' // Fix: exhaustive switch function handle(s: Status): string { switch (s) { case 'pending': return 'Waiting' case 'active': return 'Running' default: const _: never = s throw new Error(`Unknown: ${_}`) } } ``` ### State management ```tsx // Rule of thumb: // URL state (nuqs) → shareable, bookmarkable // Global state (Zustand) → cross-component, persisted // Local state (useState) → component-specific, ephemeral // Stale closure fix useEffect(() => { const id = setInterval(() => setCount(c => c + 1), 1000) // functional update return () => clearInterval(id) }, []) ``` ### Architecture ``` // Circular deps → extract shared code / dependency inversion // Business logic in components → move to lib/feature/calculations.ts // God files → feature-based organisation: lib/ date/format.ts currency/format.ts validation/schemas.ts ``` --- ## Part 2 — Consistency audit [HIGH freedom; greps LOW] ### Naming conventions | Element | Expected | Check | |---------|----------|-------| | Components | PascalCase | `userCard` vs `UserCard` | | Hooks | `use` prefix | `fetchData` vs `useFetchData` | | Utils | camelCase | `format_date` vs `formatDate` | | Constants | SCREAMING_SNAKE | `apiUrl` vs `API_URL` | | Files | kebab-case | `UserCard.tsx` vs `user-card.tsx` | | Boolean props | `is/has/should` | `loading` vs `isLoading` | ```bash rg "export (function|const|class) [a-z]" --type tsx # lowercase component exports rg "use[A-Z]" --type ts # hook patterns rg "export default" --type tsx -l | head -20 # mixed default/named exports ``` ### File organisation (feature-sliced) ``` src/ features/{name}/ components/ # UI only hooks/ # custom hooks server/ # server actions types.ts schemas.ts components/ui/ # shared primitives lib/ # global utilities ``` Red flags: - Components in `/lib` or `/utils` - Server actions in component files - Types scattered across component files - Zod schemas inline in components ```bash rg "z\.object" --glob "*/components/*" # inline schemas rg "'use server'" --glob "*/components/*" # actions in wrong place rg "from '\.\." --type tsx | head -20 # relative imports instead of @/ ``` ### Pattern consistency | Concern | Check | |---------|-------| | Server state | All TanStack Query, or mixed with useEffect? | | Forms | All React Hook Form, or controlled inputs too? | | Error handling | Consistent ActionResult shape? | | Styling | cn() used everywhere? Dark mode via CSS vars? | | Tests | `*.test.ts` vs `__tests__/`? Consistent mocking? | --- ## Coherency report template ```markdown # Code Quality Audit ## Summary - Verdict: [one line — what blocks, what is drift] - Critical findings: X ## Anti-patterns found | Pattern | Files | Severity | |---------|-------|----------| | useEffect for data | 3 files | High | | Index as key | 2 files | Medium | ## Naming convention findings | Element | Expected | Actual | Files | |---------|----------|--------|-------| | Components | PascalCase | Mixed | 4 | ## Organisation findings - Server actions found in: components/PaymentForm.tsx - Types scattered in: 6 component files ## Priority fixes 1. Move server actions to features/*/server/ 2. Replace useEffect data fetching with TanStack Query 3. Standardise component naming to PascalCase ## Conventions to document 1. Decision on default vs named exports 2. Where Zod schemas live ``` --- ## Anti-pattern detection checklist ### React checks - [ ] No `useEffect` for derived state - [ ] No index keys in dynamic lists - [ ] No objects/arrays in dependency arrays - [ ] Components under 300 lines - [ ] No prop drilling beyond 2 levels ### TypeScript checks - [ ] No `any` (use `unknown` + validation) - [ ] No unsafe type assertions - [ ] Exhaustive switch statements - [ ] Zod schemas for all external data ### Architecture checks - [ ] No circular dependencies - [ ] Business logic separated from UI - [ ] Files under 400 lines - [ ] Clear module boundaries ## Self-critique before applying fixes [LOW freedom — do not skip] 1. **Evidenced** — `file:line` or rg hit, not "the codebase feels messy" 2. **Reproducible** — the convention grep still finds it 3. **Severity justified** — High = bug/perf, not naming taste 4. **Right owner** — this PR/diff → `audit-code-review` 5. **No-false-safety** — `git blame` checked; working intentional code left alone ## Validation [LOW freedom — run exactly] 1. Typecheck with the repo's own script (`package.json` → `typecheck`, else `tsc --noEmit`) 2. Lint with the repo's own script — not a generic `eslint src/` 3. Run the repo's test script and confirm no new failures 4. Document any enforced standard in `CONTRIBUTING.md` or `.cursor/rules/`
Auf GitHub ansehen