awesome-copilot-cowork-skills

Reads a spreadsheet dataset and a question, then produces a DRAFT insight pack — a data profile, observations cited to the data (as leads, not conclusions), caveats, and suggested charts and next analyses. Never the source of truth: every figure must be verified, and correlation is never stated as causation. Use when the user asks to explore, profile or find insights in a dataset or spreadsheet.

Reads a project or processing description and produces a DRAFT DPIA pack — processing description, necessity and proportionality questions, a risk table with rating cells left blank, mitigations to consider, and open questions. Never rates risk, determines the lawful basis, or judges adequacy; the DPO assesses and signs. Works from descriptions, never personal data. Use when the user asks to start or draft a DPIA / data protection impact assessment.

Reads a requirement, regulation, or policy and the organisation's control descriptions, then produces a DRAFT controls-and-gap pack — the requirement broken into obligations, mapped controls, apparent coverage, gaps, and actions to assess. Never concludes compliance or that a control is effective; control owners and audit assess. Use when the user asks to map a requirement to controls or run a controls gap analysis.

Reads a transaction or order description and produces a DRAFT export review pack — a parties-to-screen list and checklist, a classification worksheet, a red-flag review, and licence-determination questions — to prepare an export-control review. Never classifies, screens, clears, or decides a licence; trade compliance does. Use when the user asks to review or prepare an export transaction, order, or shipment for trade-compliance review.

Reads several supplier or bid responses against a requirements list and produces a DRAFT comparison pack — a requirement-by-supplier matrix, gaps, and clarification questions — to prepare an evaluation panel. Never scores, ranks, weights, or recommends a winner; the award decision stays with the panel. Use when the user asks to compare bids, tender responses or supplier proposals against requirements.

Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table, compares each term against the user's own playbook of standard positions, and produces a DRAFT contract review pack with a deviations and issues list, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice, interpretation, or enforceability or acceptability calls. Use when the user asks to review, abstract or pressure-test a contract, NDA, MSA or agreement against their standard positions.

Builds a one-page meeting prep brief and saves it as a Word document in OneDrive. Gathers the calendar invite, recent email threads with attendees, Teams messages and shared files, then distils them into purpose, attendee positions, open threads, key files, talking points and risks. Use when the user asks to prepare for a meeting, wants a briefing before a call, or asks what they need to know before their next or a named meeting.

Turns a meeting transcript into a structured action-items file, To Do or Planner tasks where writes can be confirmed, and one DRAFT follow-up email per action owner. Use when the user shares, names, or points to a meeting transcript or recap and asks for action items, decisions, follow-up tasks, or post-meeting owner emails.

Applies a standing safety guardrail. No file, folder, email or calendar item is deleted, overwritten or moved without explicit user approval, new versioned files are written instead of overwrites, and every change is journalled. Use when the user asks to change, clean up, reorganise, rename, archive, replace, move or delete anything in OneDrive, SharePoint, email or the calendar, or when any workflow is about to create or modify files.

Keeps dated backups of the Cowork skills folder and an append-only session journal so work survives crashes, context compaction and skills wipes. Use when the user asks to back up skills, checkpoint or journal the current session, resume where a previous conversation left off, or restore skills from a backup. Also use when the user asks for a safety backup before editing any skill.

Maintains living project files (project.md, decisions.md, risks.md, links.md) in a per-project OneDrive folder from emails, Teams channels and meeting transcripts, and generates a weekly DRAFT status document in Word. Use when the user asks to set up tracking for a project, update a project's status files, log a decision or risk, or produce a weekly status report for a named project.

Sweeps a named list of news sources and blogs for items relevant to the user's role and delivers a dated digest as a Word document or an email draft, with 5 to 8 items, each carrying a one-line so-what, a source URL and a publication date. Use when the user asks for a news digest, a news sweep, a morning or weekly news flash, or to monitor Microsoft or industry news for their role.

Tracks a recurring emailed report end to end. It finds new report emails in the inbox, extracts data from their attachments, appends each reporting period to a trends spreadsheet, and rewrites a summary document with period-on-period deltas and flagged anomalies. Use when the user asks to update or analyse trends for a report that arrives by email on a schedule, or asks what changed in the latest weekly or monthly report.

Converts a priced estimate spreadsheet into a populated statement of work document using the user's own SOW template. Validates that line items, hours, rates and totals add up before drafting, flags every discrepancy, and produces a DRAFT-labelled Word document plus a validation report. Use when the user asks to turn an estimate, quote or pricing spreadsheet into an SOW, statement of work, or scope document.

Builds PowerPoint decks on the user's own company template and checks every slide against written brand rules (colours with hex codes, fonts, logo placement, banned visuals). Use when the user asks for a branded, on-brand, CI-compliant or corporate-template presentation, or wants a deck that follows company design guidelines. Confirms an outline first, then builds slide by slide and saves a DRAFT deck to OneDrive.

Builds a personal voice profile from roughly 90 days of the user's sent email and meeting transcripts, then drafts emails and documents that match how the user actually writes. Use when the user asks to write like me, match my voice or tone, build or refresh my voice profile, or wants an email or document drafted in their own style.

Scans the last 24 hours of email, Teams chats and meeting transcripts for commitments in both directions, things the user promised to others and things others promised to the user. Maintains a running commitments.md ledger with open, done and overdue statuses, flags overdue items first, and creates To Do entries with a file fallback. Use when the user asks what they promised, what they are owed, whether they missed a commitment, or to run a daily commitment sweep.

Builds a role-tuned morning brief as a Word document covering emails that need replies, today's calendar, Teams mentions and upcoming deadlines, using section presets from an editable config file. Use when the user asks for their daily brief, morning brief, start-of-day summary or custom briefing, or wants to change which sections their brief covers.

Generates a self-contained single-file HTML project dashboard (status banner, milestones, risks heat list, decisions log, links) from the tracker files in /Documents/Cowork/projects/, saved as dashboard-<project>-YYYY-MM-DD.html. Use when the user asks for a project dashboard, a shareable or pinnable status page, an HTML project overview, or a one-page visual summary of milestones, risks and decisions.

Sweeps the inbox, categorises every message as needs-reply-today, needs-reply-this-week, waiting-on-others, FYI or noise, creates reply drafts in the Drafts folder, and saves a dated triage report to OneDrive. Moves or archives mail only when a rule the user wrote in its rules file says so. Use when the user asks to triage, sort, clean up or catch up on their inbox, or asks what needs a reply today.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Business Officer archetype, covering commercial model, partnerships, deal structure, market positioning, strategic fit and opportunity cost. Produces a DRAFT review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a CBO review, a commercial pressure-test of a document, or to prepare a proposal for an executive meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Data Officer archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, data and AI governance risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a CDO review, a data or AI governance pressure-test of a document, or to prepare for a real CDO, data governance or privacy review meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Financial Officer archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, finance risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a CFO review, a finance-lens pressure-test of a document, or to prepare for a real CFO or finance review meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Human Resources Officer archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, people and organisation risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a CHRO or HR review, a people-lens pressure-test of a document, or to prepare for a real CHRO, people committee or works council meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Information Security Officer archetype, producing a DRAFT review document with a verdict, findings cited to specific passages, security and compliance risks, and the five interrogation questions a real CISO would ask. Use when the user asks for a CISO review, a security or compliance pressure-test of a document, or help preparing for an executive review where security, privacy or third-party risk will be challenged.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Marketing Officer archetype, producing a structured DRAFT review document with a verdict, findings cited to specific passages, risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a CMO review, a marketing executive's read on a document, or wants to pressure-test positioning, messaging, pricing or a launch plan before a real executive review.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Operating Officer archetype, producing a structured review document with a verdict, findings cited to specific sections, delivery risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a COO review, an operations review, or wants to pressure-test execution feasibility, capacity, timelines or cross-team dependencies before a real executive meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or product plan in character as a Chief Product Officer archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, product and adoption risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a CPO review, a product-lens pressure-test of a document, or to prepare for a real CPO or product leadership review meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Revenue Officer archetype, producing a structured review document with a verdict, evidence-cited findings, revenue risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a CRO review, a revenue-lens pressure test, or to challenge a document the way a sales leadership executive would before a real review meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Technology Officer archetype, producing a structured DRAFT review document with a verdict, findings cited to specific parts of the artifact, technology risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user wants a CTO review, a technical pressure-test of a document, or to rehearse the technology seat of an executive review before the real meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Customer Advocate archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, customer-side risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a customer advocate review, a customer-lens or voice-of-the-customer pressure-test of a document, or wants to know what a plan really asks of paying customers before approving it.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or rollout plan in character as a Frontline Skeptic archetype, the experienced staff member who will have to live with the change, then saves a structured review with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, adoption risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a frontline review, an adoption-lens pressure-test of a plan, or asks what the people who do the work will say about it.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a General Counsel archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, legal risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a legal review, a general counsel pressure-test of a document, or to prepare for a real legal, contract or deal review meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as an Investor archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, capital-allocation risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for an investor review, a capital-lens pressure-test of a document, or to prepare for a funding pitch, investment committee or sponsor meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or vendor contract in character as a Head of Procurement archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, commercial risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a procurement review, a commercial or vendor-lens pressure-test of a document, or to prepare for a real procurement, sourcing or contract review meeting.

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or rollout plan in character as a Works Council Representative archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, employee-impact risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a works council review, an employee-representative pressure-test of a document, or to prepare for a real works council, staff council or employee consultation meeting.

Sweeps a configured SharePoint library for documents past their review date, builds a dated reminder spreadsheet (document, owner, due date, days overdue, link) and drafts one notification email per document owner, as Drafts only, never sent. Use when the user asks to find overdue document reviews, run a review sweep or review-date audit on a SharePoint library, check which documents are past their review date, or draft reminders to document owners about stale documents.