| name | learning-assessment-skill |
| description | Evaluate one objective against its declared mastery gate using observable, objective-type evidence and a deterministic advance-or-remediate decision. |
| allowed-tools | ["read_file","list_dir","grep_search","glob_files","research_note","artifact_write","write_file","edit_file"] |
Learning assessment
Overview
Assessment is the gate between instruction and progression. It tests the
declared objective without answer leakage, records the learner's evidence, and
advances only when the objective-specific threshold is met.
When to Use
Use after explanation or practice, when testing prior knowledge, or whenever a
mastery status must be updated. Do not use casual practice results as an
automatic mastery decision.
Workflow
- Read the current objective, type, prerequisites, mastery evidence, prior
attempts, and help already given. Assess one gate at a time.
- Choose evidence appropriate to type: accurate recall for memory, unaided
execution plus transfer for procedure, own-words explanation for concept,
and a justified trade-off decision for design judgment.
- State the scoring criteria before grading. Ask the learner to commit to an
answer and preserve their response verbatim enough to audit.
- Evaluate correctness, reasoning, transfer, and assistance used. A lucky
answer, prompted reconstruction, or confidence claim does not clear the gate.
- Record pass or not-yet, supporting evidence, confidence in the assessment,
and the exact missing element. Keep the learner on the objective when the
gate is not met.
- If passed, schedule review and select the next prerequisite-valid objective.
If not, route the diagnosed error to remediation and reassess with a changed task.
Verification
Red Flags
- Grading against a criterion invented after seeing the answer.
- Clearing mastery because the learner recognized the correct option.
- Moving on to maintain pace when prerequisite evidence is weak.