Process GitHub issues end-to-end with TDD and parallel work. Use when asked to work on an issue, fix issue #N, pick issues to tackle, or batch-process several.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Process GitHub issues end-to-end with TDD and parallel work. Use when asked to work on an issue, fix issue #N, pick issues to tackle, or batch-process several.
Picking issues from the backlog to work on, optionally in parallel
Periodically grooming open issues and PRs to close stale or completed ones (/git:triage)
Going from an issue number to a merged-ready PR end-to-end
Hierarchical sub-issue planning and tracking (/git:issue-hierarchy)
Context
Git remotes: !git remote -v
Current branch: !git branch --show-current
Working tree clean: !git status --porcelain=v2
Open issues, open PRs, and available labels are fetched during execution (requires a configured git remote).
Parameters
Parse these parameters from the command:
Parameter
Description
<issues...>
One or more issues as bare numbers, #N, or full GitHub issue URLs (https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/issues/<N>), in any space- or comma-separated mix (see Step 0)
--auto
Claude selects and prioritizes issues
--filter <label>
Filter issues by label
--limit <n>
Maximum number of issues to process
--parallel
Process parallel groups simultaneously using Task agents
--labels <label1,label2>
Apply labels to created PRs (defaults to issue's labels)
Your Task
Process GitHub issues using a TDD workflow with the main-branch development pattern.
Mode Detection
Step 0: Normalize issue references
Before counting tokens or detecting mode, normalize every non-flag token in
$ARGUMENTS into a (number, repo) pair. Accept these forms, in any space- or
comma-separated mix:
Input form
Extract
123
number 123, repo = current remote
#123
number 123, repo = current remote
https://github.com/<owner>/<repo>/issues/123
number 123, repo = <owner>/<repo>
.../issues/123#issuecomment-...
number 123 (drop the #... fragment), repo = <owner>/<repo>
Rules:
Split on whitespace and commas; strip a leading #; strip a URL
#... fragment after the number.
A token is an issue ref only if, after stripping, it is all digits or
matches the /issues/<digits> URL shape (require trailing digits — a
/pull/<N>, /discussions/<N>, or bare /issues list URL is not a
ref). Leave --flag tokens and their values (e.g. --filter bug,enhancement)
untouched — never split a flag's comma-separated value into refs.
For a URL whose <owner>/<repo> differs from the current remote (Context
git remote -v), record it as cross-repo and carry -R <owner>/<repo>
on every gh call for that issue (gh issue view <N> -R …,
gh api repos/<owner>/<repo>/…, gh pr edit … -R …). PR creation for a
cross-repo issue needs a branch in that repo — if the current checkout is not
that repo, surface it with AskUserQuestion rather than pushing to the wrong
remote.
After normalization, dedupe and count refs: 0 → No-Arguments interactive;
1 → Single; ≥2 → Multiple.
No Arguments → Interactive Mode
Use AskUserQuestion to prompt:
questions:-header:"Issues"question:"How would you like to select issues to work on?"options:-label:"Let me choose specific issues"description:"Show issue list for manual selection"-label:"Claude decides priority"description:"Analyze issues and recommend which to tackle"-label:"Filter by label"description:"Select issues with a specific label"
For "Let me choose specific issues":
Fetch: gh issue list --state open --json number,title,labels,assignees
Present checkboxes with multiSelect: true
For "Claude decides priority":
Analyze all open issues
Score by clarity, scope, dependencies
Present top recommendations
For "Filter by label":
Present label selection from available labels
Then show matching issues for selection
Single Issue (/git:issue 123)
Process directly with standard TDD workflow.
Multiple Issues (/git:issue 123 456 789)
Analyze all issues for conflicts and parallelization
Group by dependencies
Process sequentially or spawn parallel agents
Auto Mode (/git:issue --auto)
Fetch all open issues
Score and prioritize
Present recommendations for approval
Process approved issues
Issue Analysis Engine
Before processing multiple issues, analyze for:
Blocker Check (run first)
Before sequencing or scoring, ask GitHub which issues are blocked by other
open work via the native dependencies API:
Report the open blockers inline: #N is blocked by #X, #Y.
Use AskUserQuestion to offer: work on a blocker first, skip this issue,
or proceed anyway (only appropriate if the blocker is stale or
mis-linked).
Never silently work on a blocked issue — the "Blocked" badge exists so
humans don't ship work out of order.
Also fetch dependencies/blocking to understand downstream impact —
finishing an issue that blocks others may be higher leverage than finishing
an independent issue of the same size.
Conflict Detection
Identify issues that cannot be worked on simultaneously:
Conflict Type
Detection Method
File overlap
Issues referencing same files/components
Logical conflicts
Opposing requirements (add vs remove)
Dependency chains
dependencies/blocked_by returns an open issue
Sub-issue ordering
Parent's sub_issues not yet complete
Confidence Scoring
Score each issue's implementability:
Factor
Weight
Criteria
Clear requirements
30%
Has acceptance criteria, specific details
Scope definition
25%
Bounded scope, identifiable files
No conflicts
20%
No overlapping work with other issues
Test strategy clear
15%
TDD approach is obvious
Labels/priority
10%
Has priority labels, milestone
Threshold: 70%
If confidence < 70%, prompt user:
questions:-header:"Low confidence"question:"Issue #N has unclear requirements. How should I proceed?"options:-label:"Attempt anyway"description:"Make best-effort attempt based on available info"-label:"Ask for clarification"description:"Request more details on the issue"-label:"Skip this issue"description:"Move to next issue in queue"
Parallel Work Detection
Identify issues that can be worked simultaneously:
Parallelizable when:
Different files/components
Neither issue appears in the other's dependencies/blocked_by
Neither is a sub-issue of the other
Independent test suites
No logical conflicts
Output format:
Parallel Groups:
Group 1: #123, #125 (both touch auth module - sequential)
Group 2: #124 (standalone - can run in parallel)
Group 3: #126, #127 (both touch UI - sequential)
Recommended: Run Groups 1, 2, 3 in parallel (3 agents)
Execution Workflow
Step 1: Prepare Working Directory
Ensure clean working directory (commit or stash if needed)
Switch to main and pull latest: git switch main && git pull
# All work stays on main
git switch main && git pull
# ... make changes, commit on main ...
git push origin main:fix/issue-$N# Push to remote feature branch# Create PR: head=fix/issue-$N, base=main# Continue on main for next issue
Summary Report
After processing, report:
Metric
Details
Issues processed
List of issue numbers
PRs created
PR numbers with links
Conflicts detected
Issues that were sequentialized
Issues skipped
Low confidence or user choice
Resuming work on an existing PR branch
When a follow-up request continues an issue whose branch already has a PR, invoke
/git:pr-sync-check before adding commits. A pr_merged verdict means the PR
already landed — start a fresh branch off the updated default rather than building
on the merged branch; a behind verdict means a teammate / agent / CI auto-fix
pushed under you, so reconcile first. See .claude/rules/pr-branch-sync.md.
See Also
git-pr-sync-check skill to confirm a PR branch is live and in sync before building on it
git-branch-pr-workflow skill for workflow patterns
test-tier-selection skill for test strategy
git-cli-agentic skill for optimized git commands
gh-cli-agentic skill for optimized GitHub CLI commands
