Skip to main content

writing-plans

Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
LiHongwei-cn/lihongwei-cn
Letzte Quellaktivität
22. Juni 2026 um 19:55
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
4
Forks
1

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
writing-plans
description
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
risk
critical
source
community
date_added
2026-02-27
# Writing Plans ## Overview Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits. Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well. **Announce at start:** "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan." **Context:** This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill). **Save plans to:** `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md` ## Bite-Sized Task Granularity **Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):** - "Write the failing test" - step - "Run it to make sure it fails" - step - "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step - "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step - "Commit" - step ## Plan Document Header **Every plan MUST start with this header:** ```markdown # [Feature Name] Implementation Plan > **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. **Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds] **Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach] **Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries] --- ``` ## Task Structure ```markdown ### Task N: [Component Name] **Files:** - Create: `exact/path/to/file.py` - Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145` - Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py` **Step 1: Write the failing test** ```python def test_specific_behavior(): result = function(input) assert result == expected ``` **Step 2: Run test to verify it fails** Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v` Expected: FAIL with "function not defined" **Step 3: Write minimal implementation** ```python def function(input): return expected ``` **Step 4: Run test to verify it passes** Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v` Expected: PASS **Step 5: Commit** ```bash git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py git commit -m "feat: add specific feature" ``` ``` ## Remember - Exact file paths always - Complete code in plan (not "add validation") - Exact commands with expected output - Reference relevant skills with @ syntax - DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits ## Execution Handoff After saving the plan, offer execution choice: **"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:** **1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration **2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints **Which approach?"** **If Subagent-Driven chosen:** - **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development - Stay in this session - Fresh subagent per task + code review **If Parallel Session chosen:** - Guide them to open new session in worktree - **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans ## When to Use This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview. ## Limitations - Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above. - Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review. - Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Auf GitHub ansehen