editor-review-methodology

name	editor-review-methodology
description	Editorial review methodology — fact-checking, voice audit, engagement review, and source integrity assessment.
version	1.0.0
author	Hermes Agent community
license	MIT
metadata	{"hermes":{"tags":["editorial","fact-checking","voice","engagement","review"]}}

Editorial Review Methodology

Review dimensions for assessing whether a draft is ready for publication.

Review Dimensions

Dimension	Question	Reference
Fact-check	Are all factual claims verifiable?	references/fact-checking.md
Voice audit	Is the tone consistent throughout?	references/voice-audit.md
Engagement	Does the piece earn the reader's attention?	references/engagement-review.md
Source integrity	Are sources properly attributed and verified?	references/source-integrity.md

Review Protocol

1. Structural first, line-by-line last. Don't proofread until the structure is solid.
2. Flag and suggest — don't rewrite. The editor identifies issues; the writer decides how to fix them.
3. One dimension per pass. Don't mix fact-checking with voice audit in the same reading.