Skip to main content

mapbox-geospatial-operations

Expert guidance on choosing the right geospatial tool based on problem type, accuracy requirements, and performance needs

Quellinformationen

Repository
mapbox/mapbox-agent-skills
Letzte Quellaktivität
30. Juli 2026 um 02:43
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
78
Forks
17

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
mapbox-geospatial-operations
description
Expert guidance on choosing the right geospatial tool based on problem type, accuracy requirements, and performance needs
# Mapbox Geospatial Operations Skill Expert guidance for AI assistants on choosing the right geospatial tools from the Mapbox MCP Server. Focuses on selecting tools based on **what the problem requires** - geometric calculations vs routing, straight-line vs road network, and accuracy needs. ## Core Principle: Problem Type Determines Tool Choice The Mapbox MCP Server provides two categories of geospatial tools: 1. **Offline Geometric Tools** - Use Turf.js for pure geometric/spatial calculations 2. **Routing & Navigation APIs** - Use Mapbox APIs when you need real-world routing, traffic, or travel times **The key question: What does the problem actually require?** ### Decision Framework | Problem Characteristic | Tool Category | Why | | ------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------- | ---------------------------------------- | | **Straight-line distance** (as the crow flies) | Offline geometric | Accurate for geometric distance | | **Road/path distance** (as the crow drives) | Routing API | Only routing APIs know road networks | | **Travel time** | Routing API | Requires routing with speed/traffic data | | **Point containment** (is X inside Y?) | Offline geometric | Pure geometric operation | | **Geographic shapes** (buffers, centroids, areas) | Offline geometric | Mathematical/geometric operations | | **Traffic-aware routing** | Routing API | Requires real-time traffic data | | **Route optimization** (best order to visit) | Routing API | Complex routing algorithm | | **High-frequency checks** (e.g., real-time geofencing) | Offline geometric | Instant response, no latency | ## Decision Matrices by Use Case ### Distance Calculations **User asks: "How far is X from Y?"** | What They Actually Mean | Tool Choice | Why | | -------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | | Straight-line distance (as the crow flies) | `distance_tool` | Accurate for geometric distance, instant | | Driving distance (as the crow drives) | `directions_tool` | Only routing knows actual road distance | | Walking/cycling distance (as the crow walks/bikes) | `directions_tool` | Need specific path network | | Travel time | `directions_tool` or `matrix_tool` | Requires routing with speed data | | Distance with current traffic | `directions_tool` (driving-traffic) | Need real-time traffic consideration | **Example: "What's the distance between these 5 warehouses?"** - As the crow flies → `distance_tool` (10 calculations, instant) - As the crow drives → `matrix_tool` (5×5 matrix, one API call, returns actual route distances) **Key insight:** Use the tool that matches what "distance" means in context. Always clarify: crow flies or crow drives? ### Proximity and Containment **User asks: "Which points are near/inside this area?"** | Query Type | Tool Choice | Why | | ---------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | | "Within X meters radius" | `distance_tool` + filter | Simple geometric radius | | "Within X minutes drive" | `isochrone_tool` → `point_in_polygon_tool` | Need routing for travel-time zone, then geometric containment | | "Inside this polygon" | `point_in_polygon_tool` | Pure geometric containment test | | "Reachable by car in 30 min" | `isochrone_tool` | Requires routing + traffic | | "Nearest to this point" | `distance_tool` (geometric) or `matrix_tool` (routed) | Depends on definition of "nearest" | **Example: "Are these 200 addresses in our 30-minute delivery zone?"** 1. Create zone → `isochrone_tool` (routing API - need travel time) 2. Check addresses → `point_in_polygon_tool` (geometric - 200 instant checks) **Key insight:** Routing for creating travel-time zones, geometric for containment checks ### Routing and Navigation **User asks: "What's the best route?"** | Scenario | Tool Choice | Why | | ----------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | | A to B directions | `directions_tool` | Turn-by-turn routing | | Optimal order for multiple stops | `optimization_tool` | Solves traveling salesman problem | | Clean GPS trace | `map_matching_tool` | Snaps to road network | | Just need bearing/compass direction | `bearing_tool` | Simple geometric calculation | | Route with traffic | `directions_tool` (driving-traffic) | Real-time traffic awareness | | Fixed-order waypoints | `directions_tool` with waypoints | Routing through specific points | **Example: "Navigate from hotel to airport"** - Need turn-by-turn → `directions_tool` - Just need to know "it's northeast" → `bearing_tool` **Key insight:** Routing tools for actual navigation, geometric tools for directional info ### Area and Shape Operations **User asks: "Create a zone around this location"** | Requirement | Tool Choice | Why | | ------------------------- | ---------------- | ------------------------ | | Simple circular buffer | `buffer_tool` | Geometric circle/radius | | Travel-time zone | `isochrone_tool` | Based on routing network | | Calculate area size | `area_tool` | Geometric calculation | | Simplify complex boundary | `simplify_tool` | Geometric simplification | | Find center of shape | `centroid_tool` | Geometric centroid | **Example: "Show 5km coverage around each store"** - 5km radius → `buffer_tool` (geometric circles) - "What customers can reach in 15 min?" → `isochrone_tool` (routing-based) **Key insight:** Geometric tools for distance-based zones, routing tools for time-based zones ## Performance and Scale Considerations ### When Volume Affects Tool Choice **Small operations (< 100 calculations):** - Geometric tools: Instant, iterate freely - Routing APIs: Fast enough for most uses **Medium operations (100-1,000 calculations):** - Geometric tools: Still fast, no concerns - Routing APIs: Consider batch operations (matrix_tool) **Large operations (> 1,000 calculations):** - Geometric tools: May need optimization but still fast - Routing APIs: Definitely use batch tools (matrix_tool handles up to 25×25) **Key insight:** Volume rarely affects geometric tool choice, but routing APIs have batch tools for efficiency ### Real-Time vs Batch | Use Case | Approach | Tool Choice | | ----------------------------------- | -------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | | Real-time geofencing (every second) | Geometric checks | `point_in_polygon_tool` (instant) | | Route planning (one-time) | Full routing | `directions_tool` or `optimization_tool` | | Periodic proximity checks | Geometric distance | `distance_tool` | | Live traffic routing | Routing with traffic | `directions_tool` (driving-traffic) | **Architecture note for high-frequency geofencing:** If the application calls containment checks at very high rates (e.g., 50 vehicles every 2 seconds = 25 checks/second), calling MCP tools over the network adds agent-reasoning overhead that makes it impractical. In those cases, recommend using Turf.js directly in-process (`turf.booleanPointInPolygon`) for the hot path, and reserve MCP tools for peripheral tasks like zone definition (`isochrone_tool`), rerouting (`directions_tool`), or visualization (`static_map_image_tool`). ## Common Scenarios and Optimal Approaches ### Scenario 1: Store Locator **User: "Find the closest store and show 5km coverage"** **Optimal approach:** 1. Search stores → `category_search_tool` (returns distances automatically) 2. Create coverage zone → `buffer_tool` (5km geometric circle) 3. Visualize → `static_map_image_tool` **Why:** Search already gives distances; geometric buffer for simple radius ### Scenario 2: Delivery Route Optimization **User: "Optimize delivery to 8 addresses / stops"** **Optimal approach:** 1. **Geocode addresses (if needed)** → Use `search_and_geocode_tool` to convert any street addresses to coordinates. Even when coordinates are already provided, mention this as an optional pre-step — real-world delivery lists often contain a mix of addresses and coordinates. 2. **Optimize route** → `optimization_tool` (TSP solver — reorders stops to minimize total drive time) **Why `optimization_tool` and NOT these alternatives:** - **`directions_tool`** only routes A → B (or through fixed-order waypoints). It does NOT reorder stops — if you pass 8 stops, it routes them in the order given, which is almost never optimal. - **`matrix_tool`** gives travel times between all pairs of stops (8×8 = 64 values), but it does NOT compute the optimal ordering. You'd need to solve TSP yourself on top of the matrix — `optimization_tool` does this for you in one call. Always mention `search_and_geocode_tool` as a useful companion for geocoding delivery addresses before optimization. ### Scenario 3: Service Area Validation **User: "Which of these 200 addresses can we deliver to in 30 minutes?"** **Optimal approach:** 1. Create delivery zone → `isochrone_tool` (30-minute driving) 2. Check each address → `point_in_polygon_tool` (200 geometric checks) **Why:** Routing for accurate travel-time zone, geometric for fast containment checks ### Scenario 4: GPS Trace Analysis **User: "How long was this bike ride?"** **Optimal approach:** 1. Clean GPS trace → `map_matching_tool` (snap to bike paths) 2. Get distance → Use API response or calculate with `distance_tool` **Why:** Need road/path matching; distance calculation either way works ### Scenario 5: Coverage Analysis **User: "What's our total service area?"** **Optimal approach:** 1. Create buffers around each location → `buffer_tool` 2. Calculate total area → `area_tool` 3. Or, if time-based → `isochrone_tool` for each location **Why:** Geometric for distance-based coverage, routing for time-based ## Anti-Patterns: Using the Wrong Tool Type ### ❌ Don't: Use geometric tools for routing questions ```javascript // WRONG: User asks "how long to drive there?" distance_tool({ from: A, to: B }); // Returns 10km as the crow flies, but actual drive is 15km // CORRECT: Need routing for driving distance directions_tool({ coordinates: [ { longitude: A[0], latitude: A[1] }, { longitude: B[0], latitude: B[1] } ], routing_profile: 'mapbox/driving' }); // Returns actual road distance and drive time as the crow drives ``` **Why wrong:** As the crow flies ≠ as the crow drives ### ❌ Don't: Use routing APIs for geometric operations ```javascript // WRONG: Check if point is in polygon // (Can't do this with routing APIs) // CORRECT: Pure geometric operation point_in_polygon_tool({ point: location, polygon: boundary }); ``` **Why wrong:** Routing APIs don't do geometric containment ### ❌ Don't: Confuse "near" with "reachable" ```javascript // User asks: "What's reachable in 20 minutes?" // WRONG: 20-minute distance at average speed distance_tool + calculate 20min * avg_speed // CORRECT: Actual routing with road network isochrone_tool({ coordinates: {longitude: startLng, latitude: startLat},
Auf GitHub ansehen
Diese SKILL.md ist sehr gross, daher zeigt SkillsMP hier nur den ersten Abschnitt. Auf GitHub ansehen