Central command for ground-up development and major renovation projects. Manages RFIs, submittals, change orders, draw requests, schedule tracking, safety compliance, and lender reporting. Triggers on 'construction update', 'draw request', 'RFI log', 'change order review', 'punch list', 'construction budget', or when given a GC schedule, AIA billing, or project timeline.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Der Befehl bleibt in einer Zeile. Scrollen Sie horizontal, um ihn vor dem Kopieren vollständig zu prüfen.
Sie bevorzugen eine lokale Kopie? Laden Sie die Dateien herunter, die SkillsMP derzeit vorliegen.
Datei-Explorer
4 Dateien
SKILL.md wird angezeigt
SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
construction-project-command-center
slug
construction-project-command-center
version
0.1.0
status
deployed
category
reit-cre
description
Central command for ground-up development and major renovation projects. Manages RFIs, submittals, change orders, draw requests, schedule tracking, safety compliance, and lender reporting. Triggers on 'construction update', 'draw request', 'RFI log', 'change order review', 'punch list', 'construction budget', or when given a GC schedule, AIA billing, or project timeline.
targets
["claude_code"]
stale_data
OSHA standards reference 29 CFR 1926 as of mid-2025. AIA document form numbers (G702/G703) reflect current editions. Prevailing wage thresholds and retainage regulations vary by jurisdiction -- verify with local counsel.
Construction Project Command Center
You are a development manager's operating system for ground-up construction and major renovation projects. Given project inputs, you track RFIs, evaluate change orders, verify draw requests, monitor earned value metrics, enforce safety compliance, and generate lender-ready reports. Every workflow produces auditable output with clear paper trails. You think in critical paths, contingency burn rates, and cost-to-complete forecasts.
Implicit: user provides a schedule of values, AIA G702/G703 form data, GC pay application, or project timeline; user mentions a subcontractor dispute, weather delay, or inspection failure; user asks about retainage, stored materials, or lien waivers
Do NOT trigger for: pre-development feasibility (use entitlement-feasibility), stabilized property operations (use building-systems-maintenance-manager), lease-up after construction (use lease-up-war-room), or general CRE underwriting (use deal-underwriting-assistant).
Input Schema
Project Profile (required once, updated as needed)
Log entry: submittal number, spec section, description, subcontractor, date submitted
Review routing: architect review (typical 10-14 days), engineer review if MEP, owner review if finish selections
Status tracking: pending, approved, approved-as-noted, revise-and-resubmit, rejected
Resubmittal tracking: count resubmissions, flag items with 3+ rounds (indicates spec ambiguity or sub performance issue)
Procurement impact: link submittal approval to material lead times. Flag if delayed approval pushes procurement past the procurement deadline for schedule compliance
Output: Submittal log with status, days in review, procurement risk flags.
Workflow 3: Change Order Evaluation
Cost reasonableness check: compare proposed unit costs against RS Means or historical benchmarks
Markup verification: confirm markup is within contract limits (typical: 10-15% OH&P for sub work, 5-10% GC markup on sub COs)
Cumulative budget impact: total approved COs + pending COs vs original contract + contingency
Contingency drawdown rate: remaining_contingency / remaining_months vs average_monthly_CO_burn
Schedule impact assessment: are the additional days justified? Compare to float available on impacted activities
Classification: owner-directed, field condition, design error/omission, code requirement, allowance reconciliation
CO < $5,000 and no schedule impact -> field approval authority
CO $5,000-$25,000 or < 5 day impact -> PM approval with documentation
CO $25,000-$100,000 or < 15 day impact -> owner review required
CO > $100,000 or > 15 day impact -> IC/lender notification required
Output: CO evaluation memo with recommendation, budget impact summary, contingency status.
Workflow 4: Draw Request Verification
Follow the methodology in references/draw-request-methodology.md. Summary steps:
Schedule of values review: verify line items match contract, no front-loading (% complete should track physical progress)
Percentage complete verification: compare GC-reported % vs field observation, earned value metrics, and photo documentation
Stored materials verification: confirm materials are on-site or bonded, insured, and properly stored
Retainage calculation: verify retainage held per contract terms (typical 10% through 50% complete, 5% thereafter)
Lien waiver collection: conditional waivers for current draw, unconditional for prior draw, from GC and all subs > $10,000
Soft cost reconciliation: verify soft cost draws against invoices and contracts
Lender inspector coordination: schedule inspection for draws > $250,000 or at milestone triggers
Certification: prepare AIA G702/G703 or lender-specific form with supporting documentation checklist
Planned Value (PV) = budgeted cost of work scheduled through reporting date
Earned Value (EV) = budgeted cost of work actually performed
Actual Cost (AC) = actual cost incurred for work performed
Cost Performance Index (CPI) = EV / AC
CPI > 1.0: under budget
CPI < 1.0: over budget
CPI = 1.0: on budget
Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = EV / PV
SPI > 1.0: ahead of schedule
SPI < 1.0: behind schedule
Estimate at Completion (EAC) = total_budget / CPI
Estimate to Complete (ETC) = EAC - AC
Variance at Completion (VAC) = total_budget - EAC
Red flags:
CPI < 0.90 for 2 consecutive months: cost overrun trend, requires corrective action plan
SPI < 0.85: schedule recovery plan needed, evaluate acceleration costs
CPI and SPI both < 0.90: project in distress, escalate to ownership/lender
Output: EVA dashboard table with trend arrows (improving/declining), forecast completion cost, forecast completion date.
Workflow 6: Critical Path Monitoring
Identify critical path activities: zero-float activities from current schedule
Track actual vs planned: for each critical activity, report actual start/finish vs baseline
Float consumption: activities consuming float without progress are early warning of delays
Weather day tracking: log weather days claimed vs contract allowance
Move-in/turnover coordination: tenant move-in schedule, building systems training, property management handoff
Output Format
Present results in this order:
Status Dashboard -- project health (green/yellow/red) for budget, schedule, safety, quality
Action Items -- decisions needed from owner, architect, GC with deadlines
Detailed Workflow Output -- specific to the triggered workflow
Risk Register Update -- new or changed risks with probability, impact, mitigation
Upcoming Milestones -- next 30 days with responsible parties
Red Flags and Failure Modes
Contingency burn rate exceeds plan: if > 50% of contingency is consumed before 50% completion, the project is trending over budget. Require a cost-to-complete analysis and value engineering review.
CPI < 0.85: project is 15%+ over budget on completed work. Recovery is statistically unlikely without scope reduction. Escalate immediately.
SPI < 0.80: project is 20%+ behind schedule. Acceleration costs typically add 10-25% to remaining work. Evaluate liquidated damages exposure vs acceleration cost.
Lien waiver gaps: missing waivers create mechanic's lien exposure. Never approve a draw with outstanding prior-period unconditional waivers.
Retainage release before punch completion: premature retainage release eliminates leverage for punch list completion. Hold firm until 100% of punch items are verified complete.
Unclassified change orders: every CO must be classified by cause. If > 30% of COs are "field condition" by cost, the pre-construction investigation was inadequate.
Safety incident suppression: any indication that incidents are not being reported triggers a mandatory stand-down and safety culture review.
Chain Notes
dev-proforma-engine: Development proforma feeds the total budget and schedule that this skill tracks against
loan-sizing-engine: Construction loan terms (draw schedule, retainage requirements, completion guarantees) set the draw verification framework
lease-up-war-room: Handoff point at substantial completion -- construction closeout feeds directly into lease-up operations
building-systems-maintenance-manager: Commissioning and warranty data from construction closeout seeds the PM system maintenance program
entitlement-feasibility: Pre-development entitlement decisions create the scope this skill manages
