Skip to main content

implementing-code

Executes a batch of implementation tasks with TDD workflow, source-anchored rewrite for behavioral fidelity, guideline-based code transformation, and full requirement tracing. Returns a structured batch report. Triggers: "implement tasks", "execute the batch", "write code for these tasks", "implement with source anchoring", "run the implementation". NOT for: task generation (use breaking-down-tasks), implementation planning (use creating-implementation-plan).

Quellinformationen

Repository
microsoft/github-copilot-modernization
Letzte Quellaktivität
22. September 2026 um 08:42
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
49
Forks
14

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
5 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
implementing-code
description
Executes a batch of implementation tasks with TDD workflow, source-anchored rewrite for behavioral fidelity, guideline-based code transformation, and full requirement tracing. Returns a structured batch report. Triggers: "implement tasks", "execute the batch", "write code for these tasks", "implement with source anchoring", "run the implementation". NOT for: task generation (use breaking-down-tasks), implementation planning (use creating-implementation-plan).
## User Input You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty). ## Output Code files are written into the project tree. The batch report is written under **the provided artifact path**. ``` batch-report.yaml ← structured result consumed by caller ``` ## Workflow ### Step 1: Verify Prerequisites (first batch only) Confirm required artifacts exist: plan.md (with task list and Requirement Mapping table), feature spec. ### Step 2: Load Context Read from the provided artifact path and dependency artifacts. Scan the artifact directory to find these categories: | Category | Required | Purpose | Look for | |----------|----------|---------|----------| | Task breakdown | ✅ | Work items with T-IDs to implement | Artifact with task IDs (T001, T002...), may be in `tasks/` subdirectory or main planning artifact | | Feature spec | ✅ | Requirements (REQ-XXX) and acceptance criteria | Artifact with REQ-XXX identifiers and user scenarios | | Constitution | ✅ | Project principles and constraints | Usually named `constitution.md` in artifact root | | Implementation plan | ✅ | Phased plan with architecture decisions | Artifact with phased sections and plan references | | Architecture design | ✅ | API contracts, layering, package structure | Artifact with design decisions | | Data model | If exists | Entity definitions, mappings, FK strategy | Artifact with schema/entity details | | UX/UI spec | If exists | Screen layouts, user flows, components | Artifact with screen specs | | Knowledge graph | If exists | Module dependencies and class relationships | JSON file with nodes/edges in artifact path | | Checkpoints | If exists | Upstream traceability | YAML files in `checkpoints/` subdirectory | | Guidelines | If exists | Migration rules and transformation patterns | Search `guidelines` skill | ### Step 3: Checklist Gate (first batch only) If `checklists/` directory exists, scan checklist files. If any incomplete items: display table and ask before proceeding. ### Step 4: Project Setup (first batch only) Create/verify ignore files. See `references/ignore-patterns.md` for patterns by language/tool. ### Step 5: Match Tasks from Breakdown From the task breakdown artifact, find tasks that match your current assignment: 1. Read the task breakdown (from dependency artifacts) 2. Match tasks by role, module/domain, or phase that align with your task description 3. For each matched task, extract: - Task ID, description, acceptance criteria - Plan references and REQ-XXX traceability - Source file references (rewrite mode) - Dependencies and parallel markers Unmet dependency not in current batch → report as blocked. ### Step 5.5: Discover Required API Endpoints (web applications only) **Before writing any implementation code**, check whether an endpoint contract test script exists in the project root: ```bash for script in api-test.sh api-check.sh smoke.sh health-check.sh test-api.sh; do test -f "./$script" && echo "found: $script" && break done ``` **If a script is found:** 1. Read its full contents to extract every endpoint it exercises: URL paths, HTTP methods, expected status codes, and expected response shape. 2. Treat every such endpoint as a **mandatory acceptance criterion** for this batch — equivalent to an explicit REQ in the feature spec. Missing even one will cause the post-build evaluation to fail. 3. Cross-check each endpoint against the matched task list. If any script endpoint is absent from the task breakdown, add it as an implicit sub-task in your execution plan (e.g., `T_API_dashboard: Implement GET /api/dashboard`). 4. Record the discovered endpoint list at the top of `batch-report.yaml` under `required_endpoints`: ```yaml required_endpoints: - method: GET path: /api/dashboard source: api-test.sh status: pending # updated to "implemented" when the endpoint is wired up and verified - method: GET path: /api/items source: api-test.sh status: pending ``` **If no script is found:** - Check `clarification.md` (if present) for any explicitly listed required API endpoints. - Check the feature spec for API contract sections. - If neither source provides an endpoint list, proceed without this step. This discovery step ensures that evaluation scripts are treated as first-class requirements from the start of implementation — not discovered only at post-build verification when fixes are costly. ### Step 6: Execute **Ordering:** - Sequential tasks: in order - Parallel `[P]` tasks: can run together - Same-file tasks: must run sequentially **TDD Flow:** 1. Setup: project structure, dependencies, configuration 2. Tests before code: contract, entity, integration tests 3. Core: models, services, endpoints 4. Integration: DB, middleware, logging, external services 5. Run tests: execute module-level tests (e.g., `mvn test -pl <module> -am`). ALL tests must PASS. Report pass/fail/skip counts in batch report. Test failure = task NOT complete. **Constitution & Requirement Fidelity:** - Before each task, re-read traced `REQ-XXX` — implement requirement intent, not just task description. - Verify decisions align with constitution principles. **Source-Anchored Rewrite (MANDATORY in rewrite mode):** For tasks with `[Source:]`, follow `references/source-anchored-rewrite.md`. **Guideline-Based Transformation:** For tasks marked `[GUIDELINE:skill-name]`: 1. Load each top-level guideline skill named in the plan 2. Apply transformation rules, import changes, method mappings 3. Use before/after examples as reference **Parallelism:** Run independent tasks (`[P]` marked) in parallel as much as possible to maximize throughput. **Error Handling:** - Halt on non-parallel task failure - For `[P]` tasks: continue successful ones, report failures ### Step 6.5: JS/TS Scaffolding Validation Gate (JS/TS projects only) **After any scaffolding step that generates or modifies a `package.json`**, execute this gate before proceeding to the next task. This gate is MANDATORY for all JavaScript and TypeScript projects. #### 6.5.1 — Verify required npm scripts Check that `package.json` contains BOTH a `build` script AND a `test` script: ```bash node -e " const pkg = require('./package.json'); const missing = ['build','test'].filter(s => !pkg.scripts || !pkg.scripts[s]); if (missing.length) { console.error('MISSING scripts:', missing.join(', ')); process.exit(1); } console.log('scripts OK: build=' + pkg.scripts.build + ', test=' + pkg.scripts.test); " ``` **If either script is missing**, inject it immediately — do NOT defer: | Framework | Missing `test` script | Missing `build` script | |-----------|----------------------|----------------------| | Angular (`@angular/core` in deps) | `"test": "ng test --watch=false --browsers=ChromeHeadless"` | `"build": "ng build"` | | React / Vite | `"test": "vitest run"` or `"test": "react-scripts test --watchAll=false"` | `"build": "vite build"` | | React / CRA | `"test": "react-scripts test --watchAll=false --ci"` | `"build": "react-scripts build"` | | Vue / Vite | `"test": "vitest run"` | `"build": "vite build"` | | Next.js | `"test": "jest --ci"` | `"build": "next build"` | | NestJS / Node | `"test": "jest --ci"` | `"build": "nest build"` | | Generic TS | `"test": "jest --ci"` | `"build": "tsc"` | After injecting, confirm the script was written and re-verify with the check above. #### 6.5.2 — Run the test script After confirming both scripts exist, execute: ```bash npm test ``` (or `yarn test` / `pnpm test` if the project uses those package managers) - **Exit code 0**: gate passes — proceed. - **Exit code != 0**: enter a remediation loop (max 3 iterations): 1. Read the failure output to identify the root cause (missing browser binary, missing test files, misconfigured jest config, etc.) 2. Fix the cause (install missing dev dependency, create a minimal placeholder test, fix config) 3. Re-run `npm test` 4. If still failing after 3 iterations, record the failure in `batch-report.yaml` under `warnings` with severity HIGH and continue — do NOT block the entire batch: ```yaml warnings: - severity: HIGH message: "npm test failed after 3 remediation attempts — <last error summary>" ``` > **Why this gate exists**: Eval harnesses run `npm test` unconditionally. A scaffolded project without a `test` script causes an immediate fatal error (`npm error Missing script: "test"`) that masks all other results. Catching this at scaffolding time costs ~5 seconds; missing it causes total batch failure. ### Step 6.6: API Endpoint Verification (web-application backends only) For any batch that produces or modifies a web-application backend (Spring Boot, Express, NestJS, FastAPI, Django, ASP.NET Core, Go HTTP servers, and similar), verify endpoints **respond correctly at runtime** before the batch is considered complete. A passing build proves only compilation, not that routes are wired up. #### 6.6.1 — Run the discovered endpoint contract (if any) If Step 5.5 found an endpoint contract script (`api-test.sh`, `api-check.sh`, …), start the application if not already running, then execute it: ```bash bash ./api-test.sh # or whichever script Step 5.5 recorded echo "api-test exit code: $?" ``` - **Exit code 0** → all endpoint assertions pass → proceed. - **Exit code != 0** → enter the fix loop (max 3 iterations): 1. Read the output to identify which endpoints returned errors (missing route, wrong status code, unexpected body). 2. Implement or correct the backend endpoint(s): add the missing controller/handler, fix route mapping, return the expected response shape. 3. Re-run the script. Repeat until exit code is 0 or 3 iterations are exhausted. 4. If still failing after 3 iterations, record the failure in `batch-report.yaml` under `warnings` with severity HIGH and escalate via `[notify:coordinator]` — do NOT mark the affected endpoints `implemented`. #### 6.6.2 — Manual probe (no script found) If no endpoint contract script exists, probe every REST endpoint the batch implemented after starting the application: ```bash curl -sf -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" http://localhost:<PORT><endpoint> ``` Every implemented endpoint MUST return a 2xx status code. A 404 or 500 means the route is not wired correctly — fix before completing the batch. Record probe results in the batch report under `endpoint_probes`: ```yaml endpoint_probes: - method: GET path: /api/dashboard status: 200 result: PASS ``` ### Step 7: Write Checkpoint After ALL tasks in this batch complete, write `checkpoints/tasks-to-impl.yaml` using `templates/tasks-to-impl-checkpoint-template.yaml`. This is REQUIRED — completeness gate reads it to verify traceability. ### Step 8: Report Generate batch result report per `references/batch-report-format.md` (YAML format). **If `required_endpoints` was populated in Step 5.5**, update each entry's `status` to `"implemented"` once the corresponding endpoint is wired up and verified to respond correctly. Any entry still `"pending"` at report time is a gap — record it under `warnings` with severity HIGH: ```yaml warnings: - severity: HIGH message: "Endpoint GET /api/dashboard was required by api-test.sh but not implemented in this batch" ``` ## Resources ### References - `references/source-anchored-rewrite.md` — Rewrite-mode behavioral fidelity process - `references/ignore-patterns.md` — Ignore file patterns by language/tool - `references/batch-report-format.md` — Required YAML output format
Auf GitHub ansehen