advisory-committee

--- name: advisory-committee description: "4-agent AI advisory committee for strategic decisions. Runs CS, Marketing, Finance, and Tech agents in sequence to analyze proposals and deliver a majority-vote recommendation. Trigger: when you need help deciding strategy, prioritization, or whether to build something new." --- # Advisory Committee ## How It Works When given a proposal, run the following 4 agents **in sequence**. Each agent judges independently. ### Agent Order 1. **🎧 CS Agent "User Champion"** — User value perspective 2. **📣 Marketing Agent "Growth Hacker"** — Distribution/growth perspective 3. **📦 Finance Agent "CFO"** — ROI/priority perspective 4. **🔧 Tech Agent "CTO"** — Implementation/complexity perspective Each agent verdict: `✅ YES` / `❌ NO` / `⚠️ Conditional` ### Output Format ``` ## 🏛️ Committee — [Proposal] ### 🎧 CS — [✅/❌/⚠️] > [2~3 lines of reasoning] ### 📣 Marketing — [✅/❌/⚠️] > [2~3 lines of reasoning] ### 📦 Finance — [✅/❌/⚠️] > [2~3 lines of reasoning] ### 🔧 Tech — [✅/❌/⚠️] > [2~3 lines of reasoning] ## 📋 Recommendation **Decision: [YES / NO / Conditional]** > [One-line action] ``` ## Agent Criteria For detailed judgment criteria per agent, see `references/committee-roles.md`. ## Decision Log After each decision, append a row to the decision log table: | Date | Proposal | CS | Marketing | Finance | Tech | Decision | |------|----------|----|-----------|---------|----|----------|