Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Build never-cheap, high-craft web interfaces — brand surfaces (landing pages, brand sites, launches, portfolios, hero pages with real WebGL/Three.js/Canvas/GSAP engines), product UI (dashboards, admin panels, analytics, data tables, app shells), workflow UI (merchant/admin consoles, publish & create wizards, config and settings pages, review queues), AI workbenches (AI 工作台, agent consoles, 智能体控制台, copilot UI, run streams, approval/human-in-the-loop cards), commerce pages (product detail pages, listing/category pages, cart, checkout), and H5 / phone-only screens (app UI prototypes, 活动页, mobile PDP, data-report H5, mobile sites). Routes by register: brand → soul + spectacle engine; product → palette + component system + density (split further into pages you READ = dashboards, pages you OPERATE = consoles/wizards, and and a DELEGATION layer that stacks on either when an agent does the work); commerce → PDP/PLP skeletons + anti-dark-pattern rules; h5 → a fixed 390×844 frame, safe-area math, thumb-zone hierarchy, and native furniture (status bar, TabBar, bottom sheet, FAB, push & FLIP transitions) across six phone morphologies. Ships a product color library (tinted neutral ramps + 16 accents + 12 paste-ready sets) so dashboards stop defaulting to blue. Always reads the brief first and audits against an anti-slop cheapness blacklist. Ships an anti-sameness layer (divergence) that composes a soul from five orthogonal axes instead of picking from a persona list, so repeat runs stop converging on one look. Routes single-element briefs to a component flow (8 mandatory states + a preview file) instead of the page apparatus. Carries a cross-run build log so rotation is enforced rather than narrated, and a mobile floor covering the six ways a crafted page breaks on a phone. Supports verb commands (audit · bolder · quieter · soul · diverge · animate · densify · redesign) for targeted iteration. Ships a motion layer that separates WHAT moves from HOW it is built: six routes (CSS · native scroll-driven · View Transitions/WAAPI · GSAP · Canvas/WebGL · zero-dependency CSS 3D space) against a ten-family effect catalogue of ~80 variants (spatial camera moves, particle fields, fluid & material, scroll narrative, typographic, image transform, geometric construction, physics & inertia, state transition, atmosphere), each family carrying its slop form; an effect→route lookup so a page stops shipping 60KB to do four lines of work; and a four-beat sheet that replaces "one spectacular hero over generic fade-ups" — because 「炫酷」 and 「好看」 select nothing, and every model answers them with the same particle hero. Separates 后台 (revolves around a batch of business objects) from 工作台 (revolves around one thing he does over and over) — one fork that decides density, soul and shell, resolved by what the thing revolves around rather than by head-count or screen; a workbench then picks a body, desktop or phone morph A.1. Ships an AI-workbench layer that stacks on any of them for the pages agents actually run in — a run stream instead of a chart, nine run states, a resident stop control, in-stream approval cards with linked evidence, and cost as a first-class receipt. Triggers on "make this look premium", "landing page", "personal site", "portfolio", "个人主页", "落地页", "lookbook", "dashboard", "admin panel", "商家后台", "工作台", "专属工作台", "个人工作台", "每日工作台", "打卡页", "记录页", "daily desk", "back-office", "console", "publish flow", "发布流程", "wizard", "settings page", "analytics UI", "data table", "app UI", "product page", "PDP", "listing page", "checkout", "dashboard colors", "AI 工作台", "agent console", "智能体控制台", "AI 助手界面", "copilot UI", "运行记录", "工具调用", "人工审批", "值守台", "H5", "H5 页面", "移动端页面", "手机端页面", "活动页", "小程序页面", "公众号页面", "app 原型", "mobile app UI", "app screen", "in-app page", "移动端商详", "报告 H5", "give it a soul / a vibe", "anti-slop", "hero animation", "动效", "炫酷", "加点动画", "让它动起来", "太静了", "滚动动画", "页面转场", "沉浸式", "走进去", "scroll animation", "page transition", "make it move", "feels generic", "every page looks the same", "每次都差不多", "make me a button", "just this component", "按钮", "单个组…
{"short-description":"Craft interfaces that never look cheap"}
finesse — Technically Spectacular · Soul-Distinct · Never Cheap
finesse builds two kinds of interface and routes by register (§0):
brand — design IS the product: landing pages, brand sites, launches, portfolios, hero pages. Optimize for spectacle + soul + first impression — a real visual engine, an opinionated personality.
product — design SERVES the product: dashboards, admin panels, analytics, data tables, app shells, settings. Optimize for clarity + density + usability — and still never cheap.
The through-line is identical: high craft, zero AI-slop. What applies to both is the universal craft floor (tinted neutrals, no #fff/#000, translucent/hairline borders, tinted shadows, contrast floors), the cheapness blacklist (§6), and the pre-flight (§8). What forks is the substrate above that floor and the middle: brand lays the §3 brand substrate (design-dna.md — grain, vignette, display type) and reaches for a hero engine (§4); product lays its own substrate (product-ui.md §0 — surfaces, cards, KPI tiles, density) and reaches for a component system + data viz. A dashboard is a different design language, not a brand page with charts — it does not inherit grain / vignette / giant hero type / dark-default / a hero engine.
Two more registers sit alongside them, and they work differently from each other.commerce (PDP/PLP/cart/checkout) is a hybrid — route it to brand or product by what the specific page is doing. h5 (phone-only screens: app UI, 活动页, mobile PDP, report H5) is a container: it fixes the frame, the safe areas, the thumb hierarchy, and the OS furniture, then wraps one of the other three for the content grammar underneath. A mobile PDP is h5 + commerce; an app dashboard screen is h5 + product. h5 never replaces a content register — it wraps one.
Every rule below is contextual. Nothing fires automatically. Read the brief, set the register, then pull only what fits. A skill that produces the same page for every brief has failed.
How to use this skill
Check the scope before anything else. If the brief is a — a button, an input, a card, a modal, a toast — go to and follow it instead; steps 1–6 below are page apparatus and are wrong for one component. Detection and the ambiguity question live in that file.
single element
references/component-scope.md
Run §0 Brand Read — read .finesse/log.json (the rotation memory, divergence.md §4), then infer register (brand vs product) + soul before touching code. Output the Design Read: the coordinate line, a plain You'll see: line the user can actually veto, the Images: line naming every slot a picture would carry and where it would come from, its two most likely objections, and the rotation as a sentence (§0.B). Before writing that Images: line, check this session's actual tool list — an image-gen tool, an MCP image tool, a network fetch, or none — because it decides what you can honestly offer (asset-sourcing.md §1), and prove the one you're about to name actually runs here before naming it (§1.1 — listed is not usable; a generator with no credential is not Path A). Offer it and wait; never generate or download off your own inference.
Set the §1 Three Dials (SOUL · SPECTACLE · DENSITY). Product register pins SPECTACLE low, DENSITY high.
Lay the substrate — the right one for the register. All share the universal craft floor (tinted neutrals, no #fff/#000, translucent/hairline borders, tinted shadows, contrast floors — references/design-dna.md §1). Above that floor the substrate forks:
product → the product substrate (references/product-ui.md §0): premium surfaces/cards, KPI tiles, floating panels, fixed type scale, feedback-only motion. Never pour grain / vignette / giant hero type / dark-default / a hero engine into a dashboard — that's brand grammar, not product grammar.
h5 → the frame comes first (references/h5-mobile.md §1): the viewport contract, the locked body + scrolling #app, the 560px desktop phone frame, then the safe-area math (§2). Only after the frame is standing do you lay the substrate of the register it wraps.
Then the paths fork further:
brand → pick a §2 Soul (references/style-personas.md) and build one §4 Hero Engine (references/hero-engines.md).
product → pick a palette from references/product-palettes.md first (the neutral ramp is 80% of the pixels; skipping this step is how every dashboard comes out blue). Then split by the page's job:
pages you read — dashboards, analytics, monitoring → references/product-ui.md (density, tables, charts, interaction states). Before writing, open the closest dashboard in examples/ (index: examples/EXAMPLES.md) to see product-ui.md §0 applied in shipped code — lift patterns, not whole files.
pages you operate — publish/create wizards, merchant & admin consoles, config, settings, review queues → references/workflow-ui.mdon top ofproduct-ui.md (workflow shell, numbered sections, radio-card choices, live preview, pre-submit check, derived totals, draft/commit). There is no form-workflow page in examples/ — build from the reference, and do not force-fit a dashboard example onto a form.
pages you delegate on — AI 工作台, agent consoles, copilot UI, anything where something other than the user does work over a duration → references/ai-console.mdon top ofproduct-ui.md (three tenses on one screen, the run stream, nine run states, a resident stop, the in-stream approval card, cost as a receipt). Open examples/relay-agent-console.html. A dashboard fails by being unreadable and a console by being unfinishable; this one fails by being untrustworthy, and none of the dashboard parts address that.
h5 → pick one of the six morphologies (h5-mobile.md §4: app shell · paged deck · snap narrative · commerce stack · longform site · ambient screen), then load the content register it wraps and follow that bullet above. Build the native furniture from h5-mobile.md §5 rather than inventing it — a TabBar is a convention, not a design opportunity.
Assemble the skeleton — again, the right one for the register.brand → pick one of the four §5 brand skeletons (landing · portfolio · lookbook · studio) by what the page has to do. product → the skeleton is the shell morphology in product-ui.md §1 (sidebar · floating panel · bento · triptych …), not §5. h5 → the skeleton is the frame (§1) plus the chosen morphology (§4); §5's brand skeletons and product-ui.md §1's desktop shells are both wrong inside 390px. Motion-motivated only, in all three.
Run the §6 Cheapness Blacklist (references/anti-cheap.md), the mobile floor (references/mobile-floor.md), and §8 Pre-Flight (references/preflight.md) before shipping. h5 builds run h5-mobile.md §9–§10 instead of the mobile floor — the notch/frame/scroll/touch gates, which are a different set of failures from "a desktop page reaching a phone". Then record the build — append to .finesse/log.json and stamp the CSS (divergence.md §4.3). An unrecorded build is one the next run will collide with.
The references/*.md files are the deep material. Load the one you need for the current phase — do not inline all of them.
Reference
When to load
component-scope.md
Before the Brand Read, when the brief is one element, not a page — a button, an input, a card, a modal. Routes to the component flow: keeps the register + craft floor + existing tokens, skips the skeleton / hero engine / rotation, and enforces the one gate that decides whether a component is well-made — all eight states shipped, plus a preview file that makes them visible instead of claimed
divergence.md
At §0, before the Design Read — the anti-sameness layer. Load it when output keeps converging, when the user says "feels generic / like every other AI site", or before any soul decision: the five-axis composition method (compose a soul, don't select one from a list), the anti-default two-altitude check, the die roll that breaks the model's argmax, and the assert-then-confirm direction proposal. §4 is the memory — .finesse/log.json + the CSS stamp, with a defined read step (§0) and write step (§8); without it "don't repeat" is a rule with nothing behind it. Read its §0 register boundary first — divergence is a goal for brand and a bounded tactic for product (never diverge on dashboard navigation conventions)
design-dna.md
Laying the brand substrate (grain, vignette, display type, color tokens, palette families). Product/dashboard inherits only its universal craft floor (§1: tinted neutrals, translucent borders, contrast floors) — the surfaces/cards/type/motion of a dashboard come from product-ui.md §0, not here
theming.md
Brief asks for a light/dark toggle or multiple swappable named themes — the token-role and hardcoded-color pitfalls of a runtime palette switch (not the single-locked-palette default)
motion.md
Any brief that mentions motion — 动效 · 炫酷 · "make it move" · "有动画" — and every brand build. The motion layer above the engines: the two axes nobody separates (EFFECT what's seen vs ROUTE how it's built), the six routes with their weight, their still form and their failure mode (CSS · native scroll-driven · View Transitions/WAAPI · GSAP · Canvas/WebGL · zero-dep CSS 3D space), a ten-family effect catalogue with ~80 variants and each family's slop form, the effect → route lookup that stops the model reaching for 60KB to do four lines of work, and the beat sheet that replaces "one hero engine + generic fade-ups" with four beats from four different families. Load it beforehero-engines.md: that file answers which engine, this one answers whether you need an engine at all
hero-engines.md
Building the hero engine (brand register); also covers a secondary motion vocabulary (split-char reveal, magnetic buttons, curtain wipe, scan-line, per-card fly-in) for non-hero moments elsewhere on the page — the decision layer (which engine). Scope note: these are the two heaviest routes (R4 GSAP · R5 Canvas/WebGL) of the six in motion.md — reach here only once that file's lookup has sent you to a heavy route
page-crafting.md
The brand implementation layer — what chart-crafting.md is to dataviz.md. Load it when you stop choosing and start writing: the motion gate (REDUCE/FINE probes + terminal states — universal, product too), canvas DPR + cyclic palettes + amplitude envelopes, mask-image photo dissolve, the photographic-hero scrim stack, container-query panels, nav scroll-spy over alternating sections, zero-dependency sticky horizontal pin, exploded-view scrub, colorway pin+snap, clip-path wipes, hand-written FLIP lightbox, generative (guillotine-split) layouts, CSS-only geometric collage, full-page engine + section scrims, and the Fibonacci→KNN→traversal 3D recipe
h5-mobile.md
The page only ever lives on a phone — H5 / 移动端页面 / 活动页 / 小程序页 / app UI 原型 / mobile PDP / 报告 H5. The fourth register, and a container one: it fixes the frame and wraps another register for content. Carries the viewport contract, the locked-body/scrolling-#app architecture that inverts every other register, the 560px desktop phone frame, safe-area math, the thumb-zone inversion (primary actions at the bottom), the touch rules that have no desktop equivalent (passive, pointercancel, tap-highlight, 44px), six phone morphologies, and the native furniture recipes — status bar, TabBar, bottom sheet, FAB, push and hand-written FLIP transitions. Not the same file as mobile-floor.md: that one keeps a desktop page from breaking on a phone; this one is for a page that has no desktop form at all
mobile-floor.md
Any build that will be seen on a phone — i.e. nearly all of them. The six mechanical causes of a broken phone layout, with the fix for each: overflow-x: clip vs hidden (and why hidden kills your sticky nav), minmax(0,1fr) on image-bearing grid tracks, clickable text that never wraps at any width, overflow-wrap: anywhere on display headings, one sticky at top:0, and the all-caps line-height floor that overrides §3's .86–.95 for uppercase display type. preflight.md asks whether it breaks; this file says why it breaks
3d-effects.md
Adding a 3D moment — CSS tilt/flip/coverflow/depth-parallax or Three.js model/displacement
style-personas.md
Picking a soul (brand register)
inspiration-catalog.md
Persona picked but you want a wider menu of proven techniques for that soul, or the brief doesn't fit any of the 10 personas cleanly
plain-words.md
Any time you are writing text the user reads — the §0.B Design Read, audit findings, the memory-lock notice. finesse's whole vocabulary (register, SPECTACLE, grain, scrim, eyebrow, hairline) is load-bearing internally and opaque externally, and it leaks out at exactly the moments the user is supposed to make a decision. One-clause observable glosses, plus the list of internal terms (five-axis coordinates, axis letters, reference filenames) that must never reach a user
anti-cheap.md
Before any delivery — cheapness scan
product-ui.md
Dashboard / admin / data app — pages you read (product register)
Something other than the user is doing the work, and the page's job is to make that trustworthy — AI 工作台 / agent console / 智能体控制台 / copilot UI / 值守台. A capability layer, not a page type: decide 后台 vs 工作台 first (§1's resolver), pick the body, then stack this on — it fails by being untrustworthy rather than unreadable or unfinishable, and that failure can land on any of them. Carries the four questions it must answer continuously, the three tenses on one screen (queue · live run · history), the run stream that replaces the chart as the centrepiece, the nine run states that product-ui.md §5's eight component states don't cover (including partial and stopped), stop as a primary resident control, the in-stream approval card with linked evidence, cost/context as first-class, the artifact surface, the desktop three-column shell and what changes on a phone (§9). Also the palette rule this category dies on: the AI-violet default, and the --auto vs --needs semantic pair
product-palettes.md
Any product-register page — the color layer design-dna.md §6 doesn't cover: 5 tinted neutral ramps, 16 accents with light/dark + text-on-accent contrast, 12 paste-ready sets, the known-SaaS palettes (Linear/Stripe/Supabase/Grafana…). Load it before picking a color, or you will reach for blue
examples/EXAMPLES.md
The positive-reference corpus — 22 real shipped pages (9 brand + 8 dashboards + 1 AI console + 4 H5) with a per-file "what to study" table. Open the closest one before building, especially for dashboards and phone shells (lift patterns, not whole files)
dataviz.md
Chart-heavy product UI beyond the starter table — full 25-type selection matrix, a11y grade + mandatory fallback, library picks (the decision layer)
chart-crafting.md
Any hand-built dashboard chart in a single self-contained file (mandatory for bars — the barcode-chart trap) — the no-library implementation layer: the value→height rule, div height:value/max% bar recipe, SVG coordinate normalization, line/area draw-in, donut/gauge grow, stacked bars, sparklines, the three animations × reduced-motion pairing, slider-driven live update
At §0.B, as soon as the page has anywhere a picture would carry it — a hero, a gallery, an H5 cover or scene, a PDP shot, even a dashboard's empty state or avatar row. Not a category checklist and not a delivery-time scan: the paths (generate · real stock · generative placeholder) and the ask-first gate on all of them only work if they fire before the layout is written. Carries the session-capability check that decides which path you can honestly offer, and the rule that naming images is an offer the user answers — never a licence to generate or download
New project — write PRODUCT.md (the persistent brief)
document.md
Existing codebase — extract design-model.yaml from real code
Commands
finesse runs as a full build by default, but supports verb commands for targeted iteration on an existing page — so you don't re-run the whole Brand Read for a single complaint. Each command loads one reference and does one job.
Command
Category
Does
Reference
craft [brief]
Build
The full flow: Brand Read → Dials → substrate → engine → assemble (the default)
all
init
Setup
New project: write PRODUCT.md (register, soul, locked dials, anti-references) — the brief every later task reads
init.md
document
Setup
Existing codebase: extract the built design system into design-model.yaml; report drift
document.md
audit [target]
Evaluate
Read-only diagnostic: run the cheapness blacklist + spectacle-shown + pre-flight, output a findings list. Changes nothing.
audit.md
bolder [target]
Refine
Raise SPECTACLE +2, upgrade the engine (e.g. Canvas → Three.js)
hero-engines.md
quieter [target]
Refine
Lower SPECTACLE −2, step down to GSAP / CSS-only; calm an overloaded page
hero-engines.md
soul [target]
Refine
Re-pick the persona / soul when this page is the wrong vibe
style-personas.md
diverge [target]
Refine
Every page comes out the same. The systemic fix, not the per-page one: recompose the soul from the five orthogonal axes, run the two-altitude anti-default check, roll against the model's argmax, and check the used-list. Use when the user says "feels generic / like every other AI site / 每次都差不多"
divergence.md
animate [target]
Enhance
Re-cut the page's beat sheet — motion only, soul and substrate untouched. Not just the hero: pick the families (§2), take the cheapest route each (§3), hold the budget (one heavy beat, four total, no two from one family), compose every still. Swapping the hero engine is one case of this, not the whole command
motion.md → hero-engines.md
depth [target]
Enhance
Add one 3D moment — CSS pseudo-3D (tilt · flip · coverflow · depth-parallax) or Three.js (model viewer · image displacement)
3d-effects.md
densify [target]
Enhance
Adjust DENSITY ± — add/remove content, tune information-per-viewport
product-ui.md
redesign [target]
Iterate
Upgrade an existing page, audit-first; never full-rebuild for one complaint
redesign-mode.md
Routing rules
First word matches a command → load that command's reference and follow it. Everything after the command name is the target. Lay the §3 substrate and run the relevant §6/§8 checks, but skip the parts of §0–§5 that don't apply to that single action (e.g. quieter doesn't re-pick a soul).
First word doesn't match, but intent clearly maps to one command ("too plain / boring" → bolder; "too flashy" → quieter; "wrong vibe for this page" → soul; "feels generic / every page looks the same / 每次都差不多" → diverge; "make it pop" → animate; "动效 / 炫酷 / 加点动画 / 让它动起来 / 太静了" → animate (load motion.md first — these words select nothing on their own, so §4's beat sheet is what turns them into a decision the user can veto); "add depth / make it 3D / tilt / parallax" → depth; "too sparse / too dense" → densify; "improve / fix this page" → redesign) → route to that command and proceed as if invoked. If two fit, ask once which.
No argument at all (bare /finesse) → the user is asking "what should I do here?" Don't dump the static menu. Read a few cheap signals and lead with the 2-3 highest-value commands, each with a one-line reason, then offer the full table as fallback. Never auto-run — recommend, the user confirms. Signal → pick:
no PRODUCT.md and there's real code/pages → lead with document (capture what's built) and/or init (write the brief). Brand-new empty project → init then craft.
PRODUCT.md exists, has built pages, never audited → lead with audit <surface> (read-only health check).
git working tree points at one page/file → scope audit or redesign to those files, naming them.
a recent audit found P0/P1 → lead with redesign (fix the backlog) or the specific refine verb the findings point to (gradient-text/eyebrows → quieter/soul; flat motion → animate).
nothing built yet, clear brief → craft.
Keep it to 2-3 pointed picks with the exact command to type. The menu is the fallback, not the lede.
A target but no command, building something new → check the scope, then the surface. If the brief names a single element (a button, an input, a card, a modal), route to references/component-scope.md — the page flow's skeleton, engine, and rotation are all wrong for one component, and the thing that actually decides its quality (all eight states shipped) isn't checked anywhere in the page flow. If the brief names a phone-only page (H5 / 移动端页面 / 活动页 / 小程序页 / app 原型), load references/h5-mobile.mdfirst and build the frame before anything else — a page assembled desktop-first and then squeezed into 406px is the failure mode that file exists to prevent. Otherwise run the full craft flow (§0 → §8) — the default for "build me a landing page / dashboard".
audit is read-only. It only reports findings; it never edits code. Every other command is allowed to modify the target.
Auto-trigger is unchanged: finesse still activates from natural language via its description. Commands are an added precision entry-point (/finesse quieter page.html), not a replacement — both routes lead to the same references.
After any command that modified the page, run the relevant §8 Pre-Flight gates before declaring done.
0. BRAND READ (Before Anything Else)
Most AI design output is bad because the model jumps to a default aesthetic instead of reading the brief. Don't.
0.A Determine the Register (this forks every later decision)
Ask the surface question first: does this page have a desktop form at all? If the answer is no — it's an H5 / 移动端页面 / 活动页 / 小程序页 / app 原型, opened from a chat message or a QR code, looked at in a phone mock — then the register is h5, and it is a container: go to references/h5-mobile.md, build the frame, then come back here and pick the content register underneath it. h5 wraps one of the three below; it never replaces one. The one-question tiebreak when the brief just says "手机端的页面" is in h5-mobile.md §0: "这个页面只在手机上打开，还是电脑上也要好看？" — "both" means it's a brand/product page with mobile-floor.md applied, and building a phone frame for it would be wrong.
Ask the same question for 「工作台」, and ask it before anything else.「工作台」 and 「后台」 are two different products, and defaulting the former to the latter is the most likely mis-build in this skill. Ask what it revolves around — 一批业务对象 → 后台; 他自己反复在做的一件事 → 工作台 — never how many people use it. Only then does the screen matter, and only to pick the workbench's body (desktop shell vs h5-mobile.md morph A.1); an agent doing the work is a capability layer on top (ai-console.md), not a third species. Full resolver under §1's dials table.
brand — design IS the product: landing page, brand site, launch, portfolio, campaign, hero page. Be bold, opinionated, spectacular. Goes the soul + hero-engine route (§2, §4).
product — design SERVES the product: dashboard, admin, analytics, data table, app shell, settings, tool. Optimize for clarity, density, usability. Goes the component-system route (references/product-ui.md). Still never cheap — it inherits the universal craft floor (§3's last three bullets) + the cheapness blacklist (§6), and builds on the product substrate (product-ui.md §0), not the brand substrate's grain/vignette/hero-type/dark-default.
Split it once more — but the first split is 后台 vs 工作台, not a list of page jobs. Ask what it revolves around: a batch of business objects → 后台; one thing he does over and over → 工作台 (full resolver under §1's dials table — it is the most consequential fork in this skill and the easiest to get wrong).
后台 splits by job into read and operate. A dashboard you read fails by being unreadable — product-ui.md, unchanged. A page whose primary action is a consequential commit (发布 / 上线 / 提交 / 保存配置 — a merchant publishing a campaign, an admin configuring a rule) is one you operate, and it fails by being unfinishable: load references/workflow-ui.md on top. Login forms and search filters don't count; product-ui.md §4 covers those.
工作台 splits by body, not by job — desktop keeps product-ui.md's shell at A.1's density and soul; phone goes to h5-mobile.md morph A.1. Same species either way.
Then, orthogonal to all of the above: does something other than the user do the work over a duration? An agent runs multi-step tasks, output streams in, a run can fail halfway, there's a queue → layer references/ai-console.md on top of whatever you already picked (its §8 is the desktop shell, §9 the phone form). It fails by being untrustworthy — you can't tell what it's doing, why, what it cost, or how to stop it — and none of the read/operate parts address that. This is a capability, not a category: a workbench without an agent doesn't need it, and a back-office that grows one doesn't become a workbench. A chatbot with no tools, no queue and no artifacts isn't one either; a dashboard about model spend is a dashboard.
Color is not optional here. Pick from references/product-palettes.md before writing CSS. "Dashboard" predicts blue; the product predicts a color.
commerce — a third, hybrid case: product detail pages (PDP), category/listing pages (PLP), cart, checkout. It doesn't cleanly fit either bucket above, so don't force it — route by which job the specific page is doing:
A PDP selling one hero item (a single SKU, a launch, a flagship product) leans brand: pick a soul (§2), but keep DENSITY up for specs/reviews/trust signals — see references/commerce-ui.md for the PDP skeleton.
A PLP / marketplace with many SKUs (filters, sort, grid of many products) leans product: DENSITY high, SPECTACLE low, same as a dashboard — see references/product-ui.md for grid/filter patterns plus references/commerce-ui.md for commerce-specific rules (price/CTA placement, cart, checkout, dark-pattern bans).
When unsure which it is, ask: "is this page trying to sell the vibe of one product, or help someone compare/filter many?"
Read project memory first — all three files, they answer different questions.
File
Answers
Written by
PRODUCT.md
What must stay the same? — register, users, brand personality, locked dials, anti-references. Overrides your guesses.
init
design-model.yaml
What is already built? — locked palette / type / substrate, so this page matches its siblings.
document
.finesse/log.json
What must change? — the last 20 builds' five-axis coordinates. The rotation memory.
every completed build (§8)
The first two lock consistency; the third forces difference. They are opposite goals and deliberately live in separate files — see divergence.md §4. If .finesse/log.json is absent, grep the codebase for a /* finesse · CSS stamp and infer one entry from it; if neither exists, this is the first run and there is no rotation constraint.
No PRODUCT.md, multi-page or repeat project, thin brief → offer to run init first (one PRODUCT.md keeps every later page consistent). Don't force it on a one-off page.
Existing codebase, no design-model.yaml → offer document to capture what's there before adding to it.
If memory exists but the new request contradicts it, surface the conflict — don't silently override the lock.
0.B Output a "Design Read" before generating — assert a direction, don't poll for one
Name the rejected default first (§0.D), then the direction — then say what the page will look like in words the user can picture, and give them two concrete ways to object:
Lazy default (rejected): {the obvious aesthetic for this category}
Design Read: {industry} · {soul in 2-3 words} · register={brand|product} · SPECTACLE={n} ·
layout={dominant layout family} · engine={type}
You'll see: {what appears on screen, in plain observable terms — color, motion, type size, structure}
Motion: {the beat sheet — one plain-language line per beat, plus the still. Omit only if
the page genuinely doesn't move. Route names never appear here — motion.md §4}
Images: {how many, of what, and where they'd come from — or "none, and here's why"}
Not right? Most likely one of these: ① {the most probable objection} ② {the second}
Rotation: {plain sentence — which recent direction this deliberately avoids}
Example:
Lazy default (rejected): dark page, violet glow, floating 3D render, three feature cards.
Design Read: deep-space astronomy · cinematic + reverent · register=brand · SPECTACLE=8 ·
layout=full-page engine + scrimmed sections · engine=Three.js particle galaxy
You'll see: a near-black page with slow-drifting star dust behind everything, a very large
headline sitting on top of it, and the galaxy rotating as you scroll.
Motion: 首屏 星尘在背后慢慢漂，标题压在上面
滚动 往下滚星系跟着转，越滚越深
交互 切换观测目标时，参数自己重排，不是整块刷新
收尾 底部那行坐标逐字浮起
静止版 星系定格在一帧构图最好的，其余全停
Images: 3 — a wide nebula plate behind the hero, 2 square instrument details in the spec band.
I can generate them here (they'd share one cold-blue grade); say the word and I'll
list the shots before spending anything. Or the page ships engine-only, no photography.
Not right? Most likely one of these: ① you don't want a moving background
② near-black is too heavy and you want this light.
Rotation: deliberately steering clear of the last three builds (machined metal / paper press /
phosphor terminal) — this one is water and drift.
You'll see: is the line the user actually answers. The Design Read: line is a coordinate for you — SPECTACLE=8, scrimmed sections, and Three.js particle galaxy are three things a non-designer cannot picture, cannot rank, and therefore cannot veto. A gate only one answer can pass is not a gate. Write what renders: color, whether anything moves, how big the type is, what the structure is. No jargon — references/plain-words.md if a term is unavoidable.
Motion: is here because 「炫酷」 and 「好看」 select nothing. Those words map every model to the same answer — a WebGL particle hero over fade-up sections — so a brief containing them is not a motion decision, it's a blank one. Don't ask him to be more specific; he doesn't have the vocabulary and asking spends a round to get 「就是要好看那种」 back. Assert a beat sheet in pictures instead, one line per beat, and make the two Not right? forks structurally different beats — 「你想要能拖着转的，不是自己往前走的」 is answerable in one word. Cover the whole page, not just the hero: a page with one spectacular beat and three generic fade-ups is the shape this line exists to break. Route names are internal (R6, animation-timeline, View Transitions) — he reads the picture, you keep the coordinates (plain-words.md). The still belongs here too: it is a beat the user gets to veto, not a fallback you bolt on at the end. Full method in references/motion.md §4.
Images: is here because the user cannot ask for what he doesn't know you can do. Every register has places a picture would carry the page — a brand hero, a PDP gallery, an H5 cover or ambient scene, even a dashboard's empty state or avatar row — and the default failure is silent: the page gets built with a gradient where a photograph belonged, and nobody ever said the word "image". So name the image slots at the Design Read, before any code exists, whatever the register and whatever the category. Count them, say what each depicts, and say where they'd come from in this session — which means checking your actual tool list first (image-gen tool → you can offer to generate; network fetch only → real stock; neither → say so) and verifying it runs before you name it (asset-sourcing.md §1.1). references/asset-sourcing.md is the protocol for all three paths and its authorization rules still hold — this line is what makes it fire early, when a "yes" is still cheap. If the named path later turns out unusable, §1.2 says drop to the next rung and say so — never fall from generate straight to hand-drawn placeholder.
Naming the slots is an offer, never a green light. Ask, then wait — do not generate and do not download. This line exists so the user learns the option is on the table; it is not permission to spend his generation budget or to pull assets off the open network because you inferred he'd want it. Both are actions with real cost and real provenance consequences, and the only thing that authorizes either is the user answering yes. The failure this prevents is the mirror of the silent-gradient one: a page where four images appeared, billed and un-asked-for, because the model decided the brief implied them. State the count and the source, stop, and let him answer — same gate asset-sourcing.md §2/§3 puts on both paths, just moved to where it's still free.
If the page genuinely wants no photography (a phosphor-terminal build, a pure-type brutalist page), write none and one clause of why; that is a decision the user can veto too, and stating it is not optional.
Not right? must name real forks, not invite open-ended feedback. "Let me know what you think" returns nothing. Two specific, likely, mutually different objections give the user something to point at, and each one has to be a thing you would genuinely build differently — usually the theme and the motion, since those are the two decisions the whole page hangs off.
The rotation line is not optional, and it is not decoration. Rotation you perform in your head is indistinguishable — afterwards, to you and to the user — from rotation you merely narrated. Writing it down before any code exists is what makes a bad rotation catchable while it's still free to fix. Write it as a sentence, not as axis letters:differs on E + C + A (3/5 ✓) is unfalsifiable to the user — they can't tell what E is, so they can't object that they actually wanted machined metal. The five-axis coordinates still get recorded, in .finesse/log.json and the CSS stamp (§8.0), which is where an audit reads them from. Threshold and format: divergence.md §4.4. Omit the line only on the first build of a project (no log, no stamp) — and say that's why.
STOP after the Design Read. Do not generate any code yet. Wait for confirmation or redirect.
Assert, don't poll. State the direction you're going and invite a veto. Do not hand the user a three-option menu of adjectives — nobody can choose a design from words they can't see, so they'll pick the first one and you'll have learned nothing. A menu is theater when the answer is already clear. Note that You'll see: + Not right? is not a menu: it asserts one direction and pre-names its two most likely failure modes, which is what makes the veto usable instead of ceremonial.
When the user can't evaluate the assertion at all, that's Mode 2. If the brief carried no directional information — only undirected praise-words ("好看", "高级", "有质感", "premium", "clean"), or an explicit "I can't really say" — then You'll see: will get a rubber-stamp no matter how plainly it's written, because the user has no basis for comparison. Build three real variants instead (divergence.md §7 Mode 2 + the squint test). Undirected adjectives are as strong a fork signal as a genuinely ambiguous brief.
The exception — when the brief genuinely forks (a "premium" brand that could be austere-Nordic or maximal-baroque; a personal site that could be a portfolio or a manifesto): don't describe the options, build them. Three low-fidelity but real, screenshot-able pages, each moving on a different axis, then let the user look. See references/divergence.md §7 — including the squint test that stops the three variants from collapsing into one.
If output keeps coming out samey across projects, the fix is not a better adjective in this line — it's references/divergence.md (compose the soul from five axes instead of picking from a list; roll a die to break the model's default; keep a used-list so "don't repeat" can actually fire).
0.C If the brief is ambiguous, ask ONE question — do not guess blind
One sharp question beats five rounds of wrong defaults. Ask the thing that most changes the output: "Is this meant to feel restrained-editorial or maximal-spectacle?" / "What should a visitor remember 10 seconds after leaving?" Then commit. Wait for the answer before proceeding.
0.C.1 Say it in words the user can act on
finesse's vocabulary is internal. register, SPECTACLE, grain, scrim, eyebrow, hairline, layout family all earn their place in the reasoning and none of them are answerable by the person reading. They leak out in exactly three places, and all three are places where the user is supposed to decide something:
Where
What breaks without a gloss
§0.B Design Read
the confirmation gate — he can only say "go ahead"
audit findings
he can't tell which finding to fix first
the memory-lock notice (init.md)
he doesn't know what got locked, or how to unlock it
The rule: first time a term appears in user-facing text, follow it with a one-clause gloss in observable terms; after that use it bare. Table of glosses, plus the internal terms that must never reach a user at all: references/plain-words.md. This applies to output only — reason in whatever vocabulary you like.
0.D Anti-Default Discipline
Name the lazy default for this brief, then beat it. "Coffee brand → the default is warm-beige + brass serif. I'm rejecting that for {x}." The single most-tested AI tell is reaching for the obvious aesthetic of the category. (Reflex-reject lists live in references/anti-cheap.md.)
0.E Quick-Start Dial Mapping
If the brief contains these cues, use these presets as a starting point before refining in §1:
Override these immediately if the brief provides stronger or contradicting signals. The h5 rows set the dials for the morphology (h5-mobile.md §0); the wrapped content register may adjust them.
后台 vs 工作台 — one fork, then two modifiers
「工作台」 and 「后台」 are the two things, and they are not the same product. Everything else people say — 个人工作台 · AI 工作台 · 每日工作台 · 值守台 · 控制台 — is one of these two wearing a modifier. Resolve it in three steps, in order:
两个不是判据的东西，别拿它们当判据。人数：一家人共用的记账台、一个小组共用的值守台，都是工作台；一个人独用的进销存，仍然是后台。屏幕：它只在第 ② 步决定长什么样，从来不决定这是什么。
When the brief is just 「工作台」 with nothing else, that word has no dials row — ask, don't guess. One question resolves ①, and ②③ usually fall out of his answer:
Defaulting 「工作台」 to a back-office is the single most likely mis-build in this skill, and it is invisible when it happens — the page comes out competent, dense, neutral and correct, and it is the wrong product. That's why the row above is blank rather than helpful: a dials preset for a word this overloaded would be a guess wearing a table's clothes.
1. THE THREE DIALS
Set these explicitly from the Design Read. They drive everything downstream.
Dial
1–3
4–6
7–10
SOUL — how opinionated / branded the personality is
neutral, safe, system-default
a clear vibe
unmistakable, one-of-a-kind identity
SPECTACLE — how technically-ambitious the visual engine is (finesse's signature dial)
Astronomy / music / game / crypto / fashion-tech → SPECTACLE 7–10 (the genre rewards a real engine).
Law / finance / healthcare / B2B SaaS marketing → SPECTACLE 3–5 (craft over fireworks; one restrained motion moment).
Heritage / luxury / editorial / publication → SOUL 8–10, SPECTACLE 4–6 (the type and substrate carry it, not WebGL).
Any product register (dashboard / admin / analytics / app) → SPECTACLE 1–4, DENSITY 6–9 — clarity beats fireworks. Skip §2/§4 and go to references/product-ui.md.
h5 → the dials follow the morphology, not the industry (§0.E's h5 rows). SPECTACLE is spent very differently here: there is no hero engine, and the budget goes to transitions and furniture (a FLIP zoom, a fanning card stack, a scene crossfade) rather than a WebGL canvas. An H5 page at SPECTACLE 8 is one where moving between states is spectacular; §4's engine table mostly doesn't apply.
If SPECTACLE ≥ 7, the page MUST actually contain a working visual engine (a real Three.js/Canvas/GLSL/scroll-pinned moment), degrade gracefully, and hold 60fps on a mid-range device. A page that claims SPECTACLE 8 but ships a gradient blob is broken. If you cannot ship working spectacle in scope, drop the dial to 4 and ship an impeccably-crafted static page instead. Never half-build an engine that janks or cuts off.
2. PICK A SOUL (Industry → Persona) · brand register
Product register: soul still matters (brand accent, one type system, the substrate), but skip the spectacle personas below — go to references/product-ui.md. The rest of §2 and §4 are for brand.
finesse's job is soul diversity: the same method must yield visually unrelated pages for different briefs.
Compose the soul — don't select it from a list. A closed table of ten personas yields ten pages; a model picking from ten options lands on the same two or three every time, weighted by what it has seen most. references/divergence.md §3 gives the fix: draw one value each on five orthogonal axes — palette structure · type relationship · dominant layout family · engine · material/metaphor — and let the combination be the soul. Five axes with a handful of values each is thousands of combinations, not ten. The persona table below is the set of combinations already validated — calibration, not the ballot.
Reach into references/style-personas.md for the industry→persona map (palette family, type pairing, hero-engine fit, signature effect). Examples of the range you must be able to hit:
One soul per page. Don't fluctuate warm and cool greys, or swap accent colors mid-scroll. Lock it (see §3, color lock).
Rotate, don't repeat — and make it executable. "Don't reuse the last brief's lane" is a rule you cannot follow from memory: you have none across sessions. It has never once fired. Give it teeth: keep the used-list in references/divergence.md §4 (a table of the last N builds' axis coordinates), read it before you draw, and require the new page to differ on ≥3 of the 5 axes. Saturated lanes (editorial-typographic, beige-brass craft, AI-purple-glow) are banned as defaults — earn them or avoid them (references/anti-cheap.md).
Break the tie with a die, not with willpower. When two directions are equally defensible, the model will silently take the one it has seen most. Roll for it (divergence.md §6) — and if you override the roll, write down why. An unexamined default is the whole disease.
Once a persona is picked, references/inspiration-catalog.md has a wider bench of real pages per persona (48 beyond the 5 in examples/) — technique notes, not files, for when you want a second reference point beyond the persona table's single description.
3. THE PREMIUM SUBSTRATE (Why It Reads as Expensive)
The difference between a cheap page and an expensive one is mostly a thin physical layer, applied consistently. Full recipes and exact values in references/design-dna.md. The non-negotiables below are the brand substrate.
Register note. The last three bullets — translucent borders, no pure #fff/#000, color lock — are the universal craft floor: they hold for product/dashboard too. The first four — grain, vignette, clamp() type tension, layered hero z-index — are brand-only; a dashboard replaces them with the product substrate in references/product-ui.md §0 (premium surfaces/cards, KPI tiles, fixed type scale, feedback motion). Don't apply brand grain/vignette/giant-type to a dashboard.
Grain — a fixed SVG feTurbulence noise layer at opacity .025–.05. Static, but kills the flat "vector slop" look. (Light pages too, lower opacity.)
Vignette — a radial-gradient darken on dark heroes to create an optical focal point.
Type tension — display headings at clamp() with negative tracking (-.02 to -.045em) and line-height .86–.95; extreme weight contrast against a light body (e.g. 900 against 300). Tight, large, confident.
Conditional — all-caps display is the exception, and it is not a rare one..86–.95 is correct for mixed case, where descenders (g, y, p) hold consecutive lines apart. All-caps has no descenders: cap-tops sit at the top of the line box, so at .86 the caps of line 2 collide with the baseline and commas of line 1 and the two lines fuse into one band of ink. On a wide screen the headline sits on one line and you never see it; on a phone it wraps and the collision is guaranteed. This hits the brutal-typographic souls in §2 (Anton, Bebas) hardest — condensed faces have the tallest caps relative to their em box. So: whenever text-transform: uppercase is on display type, the line-heightfloor is 1.0, recommended 1.02–1.08. Raise the leading or drop the uppercase — one or the other, not a compromise at .98. Full reasoning: references/mobile-floor.md M6.
Translucent borders — rgba(255,255,255,.07–.22) on dark, rgba(0,0,0,.06–.08) on light. Never a hard #333 line.
No pure #fff / #000. Tint every neutral a few points toward the brand hue.
Color lock (mandatory): once an accent is chosen, it owns the whole page. No surprise teal badge on a rose page. Audit every component before shipping. If the brief actually asks for a swappable/multi-theme experience instead of one locked palette, see references/theming.md — the token-role and hardcoded-color pitfalls there are different from a single-palette build.
Internally reason in OKLCH for palettes (perceptual consistency, easy light/dark pairing), even if you emit hex. Design light and dark together; test contrast in each — never just invert.
4. THE HERO ENGINE (finesse's Differentiator) · brand register
Product register: no hero engine — reach for a data-viz + component system instead (references/product-ui.md). This section is for brand.
A finesse page earns its name with one technically-spectacular moment — usually the hero. Not five. One, done at 100%. Pick the engine that fits the soul; full mount/render/scroll skeletons + reduced-motion fallbacks live in references/hero-engines.md.
Read references/motion.md before this table, not after. These five engines are the heavy end of six routes; the table below answers which engine, that file answers whether this page needs one at all — and for most beats the answer is no. Its effect→route lookup routes the majority of motion briefs to CSS, native scroll-driven animation or View Transitions at zero bundle cost, and its beat sheet covers the other three-quarters of the page that this section has never had a vocabulary for. One heavy beat per page still holds — that rule survives intact as motion.md §4's budget. What changes is that the rest of the page stops defaulting to fade-up.
Engine
Use when
Cost
Three.js + GLSL
3D depth, particle systems (galaxies, networks, DNA), metaballs, bloom
heavy; lazy-load three, gate on SPECTACLE ≥ 7
Canvas 2D
particles, fields, real-time data (K-lines, waveforms, fire), flow
dual-layer mask, 3D transforms, variable-font morph, scroll-driven animation-timeline
free; no JS, best perf
Component-level 3D ≠ hero engine. The table above is for the one full-bleed hero moment. For reusable, in-page 3D — pointer-tilt cards, flip cards, coverflow, depth-parallax layers, or a Three.js product/model viewer — reach for references/3d-effects.md (the depth command). Default to its CSS tier; it ships in any page at zero cost and rarely janks. One 3D moment per page still applies: don't stack a hero engine and a tilt grid and a coverflow.
Engine discipline (mandatory):
Progressive enhancement. The page must be readable and complete with the engine removed. The engine is a fixed background or a hero accent, never load-bearing for content.
60fps or simplify. Animate only transform / opacity. Test on a mid-range device, not your machine. Below ~50fps, cut particle count or resolution.
prefers-reduced-motion is mandatory — freeze the engine to a still frame (or hide it and show a composed static hero). Never ship motion with no fallback.
Motivated motion only. Every ScrollTrigger / marquee / pinned section needs a one-sentence reason (hierarchy, storytelling, feedback, state). "It looked cool" is not a reason. Max one marquee per page.
5. PAGE SKELETON — four brand skeletons, not one
A single canonical sequence is itself a source of sameness. If every brand page is HERO → MARQUEE → MANIFESTO → GRID → CTA → FOOTER, then every brand page is the same page, no matter how well the colors were chosen. A landing page argues; a portfolio proves; a lookbook seduces; a studio site demonstrates. Those are four different arguments, so they are four different structures. Pick by what the page has to do, then diverge inside it (references/divergence.md §3, axis C).
5.A Landing / launch — a thing exists, and it must be understood
HERO (the engine moment) → SPEC BAND (4-col hairline, real numbers) →
THE ARGUMENT (exploded view · demo · full-page engine — SHOW the thing working) →
ASYMMETRIC PRODUCT GRID (1.4fr 1fr — never 4 identical cards) →
TECH / DEPTH (dark-panel inversion, numbered only if the numbering means something) →
CTA (oversized) → FOOTER
The load-bearing section is the argument — an exploded-view scrub, a live console, a working demo (page-crafting.md §5.B). A landing page that only asserts quality and never shows it is a brochure. If the product is physical or layered, take it apart on scroll.
5.B Portfolio / personal — the work is the argument; you are not
INTRO (a full-bleed image or a statement — not a headshot-and-tagline) →
THE WORK (filmstrip accordion · generative grid · list-rows with thumbnails) →
MANIFESTO (one statement, one column) → CAPABILITIES (list, not cards) →
SELECTED DETAIL (one project, deep) → CONTACT (oversized type) → FOOTER
Rules that are specific to a personal site, and that AI gets wrong every time:
The work comes before the words. An "About me" section above the first project is a résumé, not a portfolio.
A grid of 6 identical project cards is the failure mode. Reach for a list with rows (64px 1fr auto 90px + a small thumbnail), a hover-expand filmstrip (page-crafting.md §3), or a generative split grid (§8). The layout should already say what kind of designer you are.
No "skills" bar charts. A percentage on "creativity" is the single cheapest thing a personal page can contain.
One project shown deeply beats six shown shallowly.
5.C Lookbook / collection — the mood is the product
HERO (split: type | image, ragged) → BRAND STATEMENT (dark inversion, one quote, 100vh) →
HORIZONTAL LOOKBOOK (pinned track, ragged heights, bottom-aligned) →
MATERIALS (clip-path wipe cards) → COLLECTION (gap:2px grid — a spread, not a card wall) →
ATELIER (1fr 1fr, image + CTA) → FOOTER
Light/dark alternation is the structure here, which forces a nav that adapts to what's under it (page-crafting.md §4 — scroll-spy, not mix-blend-mode). Density comes from rhythm (ragged heights, tight gutters), not from adding sections. Hierarchy is carried by an opacity ladder on 3-4 tokens, not by more colors.
5.D Agency / studio — the capability is the product
HERO (composition — geometric collage · type-as-image · CSS-only) →
PROOF BAND (stats with real provenance) → CRAFT (split, one idea) →
SERVICES (≤4, and they must differ from each other visually) →
DARK INVERSION (offers · bento · a change of key) →
TESTIMONIAL RAIL (scroll-snap, autoplay off on interaction) → CTA → FOOTER
The trap: services as four identical icon-cards — icon, title, two lines, ×4. That is the #1 tell (anti-cheap.md), and it's endemic to agency pages. If four services must appear, make the cards structurally different (varying spans, one with an image, one with a number), or use a numbered list with real typographic weight instead.
Rules that hold across all four
Nav: single line, ≤80px. Over alternating light/dark sections use a scroll-spy class toggle (page-crafting.md §4). mix-blend-mode: difference only over high-contrast imagery — it goes muddy over mid-tones.
Layout diversification: once a layout family is used (3-col cards, full-width quote, split image+text), it appears at most once more. Max 2 consecutive image+text zigzags. A page with 8 sections uses ≥4 layout families — count them before shipping.
Eyebrow restraint: the tiny-uppercase-tracked label above every headline is the #1 AI tell. Max 1 eyebrow per 3 sections — ≤ ceil(sections / 3), counted, not felt. Usually the headline alone is enough.
Theme lock: one theme per page — except where the skeleton above calls for a deliberate dark inversion (5.C, 5.D), which is a structural device, not a drift.
Numbering (01 · 02 · 03) must be motivated by the material — film frame codes, plate numbers, movement parts. As default architecture it is a tell.
6. THE CHEAPNESS BLACKLIST
Before declaring done, scan against references/anti-cheap.md — the merged anti-slop list (AI tells + absolute bans + reflex-reject fonts/palettes/aesthetics). The headline offenders:
em-dashes in copy as a flourish — banned outright (the single most-violated tell).
eyebrow on every section, numbered 01 · 02 · 03 markers as default architecture.
identical card grids (icon + title + text × 6), div-based fake screenshots / fake dashboards.
fake-precise numbers (92%, 4.1×) with no real source.
default-category palette (beige+brass for craft, purple-glow for AI/SaaS) — name it, reject it.
Inter/Fraunces/Instrument Serif as unexamined defaults — fine if chosen with a reason, a tell if reached for blindly.
zero imagery in a slot the page actually has for one — hero, gallery, PDP shot, H5 cover/scene, empty state. Judged off the skeleton, not the industry; that's a bug, not minimalism. Its mirror fails too: images that appeared without the user saying yes (asset-sourcing.md §0).
7. PERFORMANCE & ACCESSIBILITY GUARDRAILS
Animate transform/opacity only; never top/left/width/height. will-change sparingly.
prefers-reduced-motion: stop canvas loops, freeze grain, swap to static. Mandatory on every animated page — no exceptions, decorative motion included. A page that animates without a reduced-motion terminal state is shipping broken.
Capability-probe pattern (the ship-ready shape): read the probes once at the top — const RM = matchMedia('(prefers-reduced-motion:reduce)').matches; const FINE = matchMedia('(hover:hover) and (pointer:fine)').matches; — then branch per effect: if (RM) <set final state> else <animate>. Gate pointer-dependent motion (magnetic buttons, cursor followers, hover accordions) behind FINE so it never fires on touch. Pair with the CSS backstop @media (prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){*{animation-duration:.01ms!important;transition-duration:.01ms!important}}. Every hand-built chart draw-in ships its terminal state the same way (chart-crafting.md §6).
Color contrast WCAG AA: body ≥ 4.5:1, large text ≥ 3:1. Includes buttons over photos (add scrim/stroke), placeholders, focus rings.
Visible focus states on every interactive element. Nav and CTAs reachable by keyboard.
Core Web Vitals: lazy-load heavy engines, min-h-dvh over 100vh on mobile, responsive images (WebP/AVIF), CLS < 0.1.
Mobile collapse declared explicitly per multi-column section. Touch targets ≥ 44px.
h5 register: the six rules below are about a desktop page surviving a phone. A phone-only page has a different gate list — notch / frame / scroll-container / touch / SE-height / ambient-motion — in references/h5-mobile.md §10. M1/M4/M6 still hold inside the frame; M2 and M5 largely evaporate (one column, one bottom bar).
The mobile floor — six hard rules, full reasoning in references/mobile-floor.md. Test at 320 · 375 · 414 · 768, not by dragging a desktop window until it looks off. M1overflow-x: clip on both html and body — never hidden, which makes a scroll container and silently kills every sticky descendant. M2 image-bearing grid tracks are minmax(0,1fr), never bare 1fr (whose auto minimum is the image's intrinsic width); flex children get min-width: 0. M3 clickable text never wraps at any width — shorten the label first, nowrap second. M4 display headings carry overflow-wrap: anywhere; min-width: 0. M5 exactly one sticky at top: 0; others offset by --nav-h, with --z-nav above --z-sticky. M6 all-caps display type has a line-height floor of 1.0 (see §3). scripts/detect.mjs catches M1/M2/M5/M6 mechanically; M3 and M4 need a rendered page at 320px.
8. PRE-FLIGHT CHECK
Run the full checklist in references/preflight.md before saying "done." It merges the substrate check, the cheapness scan, the spectacle-claimed verification, the mobile floor, and the a11y gates. If any hard rule fails, it is shipping broken work — fix before delivery.
Gate 1 runs first and takes ten seconds: does the page actually render? Every local href / src / url() must resolve to a file that exists, and the detector must have been found and run. This is not pedantry — a <link> to a stylesheet that was never written renders as unstyled serif text, and every other check in the file passes on it, because there is no grain to be missing and no #fff to be banned in a file that doesn't exist. It is also how a truncated build ships: HTML written, run ended before the CSS, .finesse/log.json dutifully recording a page that isn't on screen. preflight.md Gate 1 has the detector-resolution snippet — the detector lives with the skill, not in the user's project, so a hard-coded skills/finesse-ui/… path silently fails everywhere except a vendored copy.
8.0 Record the build (after Pre-Flight passes, before you say "done")
Two writes. They cost about thirty seconds and they are the only reason the next run can rotate off this one.
Stamp the CSS. The first non-empty line of the page's stylesheet (or the top of the inline <style>) carries the five-axis coordinates:
h5 builds add the morphology — register=h5 · morph=A-app-shell · … (h5-mobile.md §11). Rotation applies to the soul axes and the morphology, never to the furniture: every app's TabBar should look like every other app's TabBar, the same carve-out divergence.md §0 makes for dashboard navigation.
Append to .finesse/log.json — prepend the entry to the array, trim to the last 20. Schema in divergence.md §4.1. Create the directory and file if they don't exist.
Component-scope builds do neither of these — they use the component stamp and are never logged (component-scope.md §5). Components don't rotate; a project's buttons should look like siblings.
8.A POST-DELIVERY ITERATION GUIDE
After the user receives the initial output, map their feedback to the correct targeted fix. Never rebuild from scratch for a single complaint — identify the dial or module responsible and adjust only that. The Command column is the verb to route through (see ## Commands); if the user typed the command, you're already there.
User says
Command
Action
"too plain / boring"
bolder
Raise SPECTACLE +2; consider upgrading the engine type (e.g. Canvas → Three.js)
"too flashy / overwhelming"
quieter
Lower SPECTACLE −2; simplify or swap to Engine D (GSAP) or E (CSS-only)
"wrong vibe / feels off"
soul
Re-run §2 with a different persona from references/style-personas.md
"too much whitespace"
densify
Raise DENSITY +2; add one content section
"too cluttered"
densify
Lower DENSITY −2; cut a section, increase section padding
"more personality / bolder"
bolder
Raise SOUL +2; push color commitment level up one step in references/design-dna.md
"feels generic / like every other AI site"
diverge
Systemic, not per-page. Recompose the soul from the five axes (divergence.md §3), run the two-altitude anti-default check (§2), roll against the argmax (§6), check the used-list (§4). Reaching for soul here just picks a different row from the same ten-row table — which is the problem, not the fix
"every page you make looks the same"
diverge
Same as above. Then write the used-list (divergence.md §4) — without it, "don't repeat" is a rule with no memory behind it and it will never fire
"change the colors"
soul
Re-run color strategy in references/design-dna.md; maintain the accent lock rule
"different animation"
animate
Swap engine type in §4; re-run references/hero-engines.md for that engine's skeleton
"add depth / make it 3D / tilt / parallax"
depth
Add one 3D moment from references/3d-effects.md — default to the CSS tier (tilt/flip/coverflow/depth-parallax); Three.js only for a real rendered object
Lower SPECTACLE; switch to Engine E (CSS-only) or reduce particle count/FBO resolution
"needs to work on mobile"
redesign
Declare mobile layout per multi-column section; min-h-dvh, touch targets ≥44px
"不知道它在干嘛 / 一直转圈 / 停不下来 / 花了多少钱看不到" (AI 工作台)
redesign
Not a styling complaint — the register's four questions are unanswered. ai-console.md: a run stream with per-step duration (§2) instead of one spinner, all nine run states (§3), a resident stop (§4), a receipt line and budget meter (§6)
"像个聊天窗口，不像工作台" (AI 工作台)
redesign
Bubbles-only is the failure. ai-console.md §1 — the queue and the history are missing, so only the present tense is on screen; add the rail (or the phone's pinned strip, §9) before touching anything visual
"刘海挡住了 / 底部栏遮住内容 / 按不动" (h5)
redesign
Not a layout opinion — a mechanical defect. Run h5-mobile.md §10's gates in order: missing env() (§2.A), missing #app bottom padding (§2.C), sub-44px hit areas or absent :active (§3)
"不像 app / 像个网页" (h5)
redesign
The furniture is missing or wrong, not the palette. h5-mobile.md §5 — status bar, TabBar active state, home indicator, sheet grab handle, push transition — plus §9's tell list
"is this any good? / review it"
audit
Read-only: run the blacklist + spectacle-shown + pre-flight, report findings
9. OUT OF SCOPE
finesse covers brand, product, commerce and h5, so its scope is wide. Hand off only when the work is a pure backend / API / data task with no interface, or a brief that explicitly wants a generic, conventional, zero-craft page (finesse always brings craft — if the user truly wants bland, that's a different tool). Everything from a spectacle landing page to a dense admin dashboard to a phone-only 活动页 is in scope: set the register in §0 and route accordingly.
One boundary worth naming: h5 covers the design of a phone-only page, not the platform plumbing around it. WeChat JS-SDK wiring, share-card configuration, payment integration, app-shell native bridges, and mini-program framework scaffolding are engineering tasks, not design ones — build the screen, hand those off.
