| name | audit-evidence |
| description | Audit numeric, artifact, log, citation, and cross-report claims against inspectable evidence. Use for reports, syntheses, benchmark claims, external citations, or conflicting Expert outputs. |
Audit Evidence
Build a claim-to-evidence map from the supplied target. Plausibility is not
evidence, and absence of evidence is unverified, not confirmation.
Checks
- Verify every decision-relevant number and every quantitative or completion
claim PI intends to deliver against a specific file, line, log, or structured
output. For homogeneous supporting numbers or artifacts, inspect a
representative set covering the main types and boundary cases, expanding it
only when a discrepancy or shared dependency makes the remainder material.
- Verify that cited sources exist, support the exact proposition, and are not
overstated beyond population, method, or result scope.
- Verify that decision-relevant evidence existed before the decision or
revision it is claimed to support. A post-hoc citation does not retroactively
ground an earlier choice. Use artifact versions, task records, checkpoints,
diffs, and run metadata; if they cannot establish order, identify the exact
missing chronology evidence and mark the link
unverified.
- Reconcile conflicting Expert reports and distinguish direct evidence,
interpretation, assumption, and unresolved uncertainty.
- Check that report text matches the latest artifact revision and does not turn
limitations, missing checks, or qualified findings into unconditional claims.
- Record exact missing evidence and the likely owner; never fill gaps by
inference or by recomputing results.
For a bounded parallel review, use evidence-extractor with the target report
and its cited evidence packet. Ask for a compact claim map and candidate findings,
not a verdict.
