| name | operations-workflow |
| description | Use when preparing a service for production, hardening a flaky system, or building lasting operational improvements after an incident. Triggers on: "production readiness review", "going to prod", "pre-launch ops check", system hardening", "์ด์ ์ค๋น", |
| type | workflow |
| theme | operations |
| scenarios | ["Run a full production readiness review before we launch next week","New microservice going to prod โ walk me through the full ops setup","System has been flaky in production, help me harden it end-to-end","ํ๋ก๋์
์ถ์ ์ ์ด์ ์ค๋น ์ ์ฒด ์ ๊ฒํด์ค","์ ์๋น์ค ์ฒ์ ๋ฐฐํฌํ๋๋ฐ ์ด์ ์
์
๋จ๊ณ๋ณ๋ก ๊ฐ๋ณด์","์ฅ์ ๋ฐ๋ณต๋๋ ์๋น์ค ์์ ํ ํ๋ก์ธ์ค ์ ์ฒด ๋๋ ค์ค"] |
| estimated_time | 4-16 hours (full), 1-3 hours per step |
| compatibility | {"recommended":["think-tool"],"optional":["sequential-thinking","mcp-reasoner"],"remote_mcp_note":"think-tool์ SLO ์ค์ , ์ํท ๋ธ๋ ์ด์ปค ์๊ณ๊ฐ, ์นด์ค์ค ๋ธ๋ผ์คํธ ๋ฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ถ์์ ์ ํจํฉ๋๋ค. Claude ์ค์ โ MCP Servers์์ remote SSE ์๋ํฌ์ธํธ๋ฅผ ์ถ๊ฐํ์ธ์."} |
Operations Workflow
4-phase production operations process: build โ observe โ harden โ respond.
When to Use / When Not to Use
| Use | Skip |
|---|
| Pre-launch production readiness review | Active incident in progress โ use incident-response-playbook directly |
| New service going to prod for the first time | Single-step need โ run the individual skill directly |
| System showing recurring production issues | Quick config tweak with no systemic gaps |
Workflow Overview
Phase 1: BUILD
[1] dockerfile-optimizer โ skip for non-container deployments
|
v
Phase 2: OBSERVE
[2] sre-engineer โ SLOs, error budgets, golden signals
|
[3] performance-profiling-optimization โ baseline, bottlenecks, fix
|
v
Phase 3: HARDEN
[4] circuit-breaker-tuner โ downstream resilience, fallbacks
|
[5] chaos-engineer โ run AFTER Step 4 is configured
|
v
Phase 4: RESPOND
[6] incident-response-playbook โ runbooks, severity matrix, RCA
Steps
Step 1 โ Container Image Optimization
Skill: dockerfile-optimizer
Goal: Minimize image size, accelerate CI cache, harden container security
Input: Existing Dockerfile and target runtime stack
Output: Annotated before/after diff, size delta estimate, security findings
Skip if: Service is not containerized (VM, bare-metal, or FaaS)
"Step 1 ์์" ๋๋ "Dockerfile ์ต์ ํํด์ค"
Step 2 โ SLO and Observability Setup
Skill: sre-engineer
Goal: Define SLIs/SLOs, configure golden-signal dashboards, set multi-window burn-rate alerts
Input: Service architecture, traffic patterns, business reliability requirements
Output: SLO definitions, Prometheus alert rules (or equivalent), error budget policy, runbook stubs
Skip if: SLOs are already defined, approved, and alerting is active
"Step 2 ์์" ๋๋ "SLO์ ๋ชจ๋ํฐ๋ง ์ค์ ํด์ค"
Step 3 โ Performance Baseline and Profiling
Skill: performance-profiling-optimization
Goal: Establish latency/resource baseline, identify bottlenecks, verify fixes with data
Input: Running service with P50/P95/P99 metrics; load test or production traffic profile
Problem statement, profiler evidence (flame graph), before/after comparison
Performance is non-critical and P99 is within SLO headroom