| name | comment-writer |
| description | Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments. |
| license | Apache-2.0 |
| metadata | {"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"1.0"} |
When to Use
Load this skill whenever you write a comment that another human will read.
Use it for:
- GitHub PR or issue comments.
- Review feedback and requested changes.
- Maintainer replies.
- Slack, Discord, or async project updates.
Voice Rules
| Rule | Requirement |
|---|
| Be useful fast | Start with the actionable point. Do not recap the whole PR before feedback. |
| Be warm and direct | Sound like a thoughtful teammate, not a corporate bot. |
| Keep it short | Prefer 1 to 3 short paragraphs or a tight bullet list. |
| Explain why | Give the technical reason when asking for a change. |
| Avoid pile-ons | Comment on the highest-value issue, not every tiny preference. |
| Match thread language | Write in the same language the thread uses. For regional tone and style, defer to the active persona — do not inject regional expressions (e.g. voseo) on your own. |
| No em dashes | Use commas, periods, or parentheses instead. |
Comment Formula
<Direct observation or request>
<Why it matters, only if needed>
<Concrete next action>
Examples
Request change
Good approach overall. I'd split this into a separate commit because it mixes validation logic with UI wiring.
That keeps the reviewer's focus narrower and makes rollback cleaner if the integration fails.
Approve with a note
Approved. The scope is clear and the change is well-contained.
For the next PR, add links to the previous and following PRs so the chain stays navigable.
Ask for split
This PR exceeds the 400-line budget, so we need to split it or justify `size:exception`.
Suggested order: foundation + tests first, then integration, then docs. That gives each review a clear start and end.
Commands
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json title,body,additions,deletions,changedFiles
