Skip to main content

cmd-code-what

Catch the user up on what the agent has been doing in the current session with 3-5 ultra-tight bullet points. Use when the user invokes /cmd-what, asks "what are you doing", "what did you do", "catch me up", "status", "where are we", or otherwise needs a fast situational summary of in-flight agent work.

Quellinformationen

Repository
Olshansk/agent-skills
Letzte Quellaktivität
3. Mai 2026 um 20:47
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
9
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
cmd-code-what
description
Catch the user up on what the agent has been doing in the current session with 3-5 ultra-tight bullet points. Use when the user invokes /cmd-what, asks "what are you doing", "what did you do", "catch me up", "status", "where are we", or otherwise needs a fast situational summary of in-flight agent work.
disable-model-invocation
true
# What <!-- omit in toc --> Give the user a high-signal, low-noise snapshot of what's happened in this session so they can re-enter the loop without scrolling back. ## Output format Reply with **3-5 bullet points only**. No preamble, no closing summary, no headers, no follow-up questions. Each bullet must be: ``` - **1-3 word label**: explanation in less than 120 characters ``` Hard rules: - **3-5 bullets, no more, no less in spirit** (4 is the sweet spot) - **Label**: 1-3 words, bolded, title-case or kebab-case, names a concrete thing (file, action, decision, blocker) - **Explanation**: a single clause, **< 120 characters including the label**, present tense or past tense — never future tense ("will", "going to") - No nested bullets, no code fences, no links, no emoji unless one is genuinely load-bearing - Skip anything the user already knows from the last 1-2 turns — focus on what they'd miss if they just walked back to the terminal ## What to include (in priority order) 1. **Current focus** — what file/task is actively being worked on right now 2. **Most recent concrete change** — what just got written, edited, run, or decided 3. **Blocker or open question** — anything waiting on the user, or that's stuck 4. **Next step** — the very next action the agent intends to take, if obvious 5. **Notable side effects** — files created, branches touched, processes started, only if relevant ## What to leave out - Restating the original user request verbatim - Tool-call narration ("I ran ls, then grep, then…") - Anything that happened more than ~10 turns ago unless it's still load-bearing - Hedging, qualifiers, or meta-commentary about the summary itself ## Example User: `/cmd-what` Good response: ``` - **Editing**: refactoring `auth/session.py` to drop the legacy cookie path - **Tests**: 14/16 passing, 2 failing on token refresh edge case - **Blocked**: need to know if expired refresh tokens should silently re-auth or 401 - **Next**: wire the chosen behavior into `refresh_token()` once you decide ``` Bad response (too verbose, narrates tool calls, future-tense, missing labels): ``` - I started by reading the auth module and then I grepped for cookie usage - I'm planning to refactor the session handling but first I want to check with you - The tests will probably need updates too ```
Auf GitHub ansehen