Use when legal assistant — contract review checklists, IP protection, business compliance, GDPR/privacy for digital products, DMCA, software licensing, employment law, and dispute resolution. Built for 1-person companies scaling to team.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Use when legal assistant — contract review checklists, IP protection, business compliance, GDPR/privacy for digital products, DMCA, software licensing, employment law, and dispute resolution. Built for 1-person companies scaling to team.
"""Validate contract review checklist for common omissions."""from dataclasses import dataclass, field
@dataclassclassContractClause:
name: str
present: bool = False
notes: str = ""@dataclassclassContractReview:
title: str
clauses: list[ContractClause] = field(default_factory=list)
jurisdiction: str = ""
parties: list[str] = field(default_factory=list)
defmissing_clauses(self) -> list[str]:
return [c.name for c inself.clauses ifnot c.present]
defscore(self) -> float:
ifnotself.clauses:
return0.0returnsum(1for c inself.clauses if c.present) / len(self.clauses)
# Essential clauses for a software services agreement
ESSENTIAL_CLAUSES = [
"Scope of Work", "Payment Terms", "IP Ownership",
"Confidentiality", "Limitation of Liability", "Termination",
"Data Processing", "Warranty Disclaimer", "Indemnification",
"Dispute Resolution / Governing Law",
]
defreview_contract(title: str, parties: list[str], present: list[str],
jurisdiction: str = "") -> ContractReview:
clauses = [ContractClause(name=c, present=c in present) for c in ESSENTIAL_CLAUSES]
review = ContractReview(title=title, clauses=clauses,
jurisdiction=jurisdiction, parties=parties)
missing = review.missing_clauses()
print(f"Contract: {review.title}")
print(f"Score: {review.score():.0%} ({len(ESSENTIAL_CLAUSES) - len(missing)}/{len(ESSENTIAL_CLAUSES)})")
if missing:
print(f"Missing clauses: {', '.join(missing)}")
ifnot jurisdiction:
print("WARNING: No governing law/jurisdiction specified")
return review
GDPR Compliance Checker
"""Check a digital product's GDPR compliance posture."""from dataclasses import dataclass, field
@dataclassclassGDPRCheck:
requirement: str
met: bool = False
evidence: str = ""@dataclassclassGDPRStatus:
product_name: str
checks: list[GDPRCheck] = field(default_factory=list)
defcompliance_pct(self) -> float:
ifnotself.checks:
return0.0returnsum(1for c inself.checks if c.met) / len(self.checks) * 100defgaps(self) -> list[str]:
return [c.requirement for c inself.checks ifnot c.met]
GDPR_REQUIREMENTS = [
("Lawful basis documented (Art. 6)", "Record of processing activity"),
("Privacy notice provided (Art. 13-14)", "Published privacy policy"),
("Data retention schedule defined (Art. 5(1)(e))", "Retention policy"),
("Data Subject Access Request process (Art. 15)", "DSAR workflow"),
("Consent mechanism auditable (Art. 7)", "Consent records"),
("Data Processing Agreement with subprocessors (Art. 28)", "DPA signed"),
("Security measures documented (Art. 32)", "Security policy"),
("Breach notification procedure (Art. 33-34)", "Incident response plan"),
]
defassess_gdpr(product_name: str, met_requirements: list[str]) -> GDPRStatus:
checks = [GDPRCheck(req, met=req in met_requirements, evidence=ev)
for req, ev in GDPR_REQUIREMENTS]
status = GDPRStatus(product_name=product_name, checks=checks)
print(f"GDPR Assessment: {status.product_name}")
print(f"Compliance: {status.compliance_pct():.0f}%")
if gaps := status.gaps():
print(f"Gaps ({len(gaps)}):")
for g in gaps:
print(f" [ ] {g}")
return status
DMCA Takedown Notice Generator
"""Generate a DMCA takedown notice for infringing content."""from datetime import date
defgenerate_dmca_notice(
copyright_holder: str,
infringing_url: str,
original_work_url: str,
platform_name: str,
platform_agent: str = "Copyright Agent",
email: str = "",
) -> str:
today = date.today().isoformat()
notice = f"""
DATE: {today}
TO: {platform_name}
ATTN: {platform_agent}
DMCA TAKEDOWN NOTICE — 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)
1. IDENTIFICATION OF COPYRIGHTED WORK:
{original_work_url}
2. IDENTIFICATION OF INFRINGING MATERIAL:
{infringing_url}
3. CONTACT INFORMATION:
Name: {copyright_holder}
Email: {email or'[email required]'}
4. GOOD FAITH STATEMENT:
I hereby state that I have a good faith belief that the disputed use
is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
5. ACCURACY STATEMENT UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY:
The information in this notification is accurate, and I swear under
penalty of perjury that I am the copyright owner or authorized to
act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is infringed.
SIGNATURE: _________________________
"""return notice.strip()
Software License Compatibility Checker
"""Check compatibility between two open-source licenses."""# SPDX license expression compatibility matrix (simplified)
_COMPATIBLE = {
("MIT", "MIT"): True,
("MIT", "Apache-2.0"): True,
("MIT", "GPL-2.0-only"): True,
("MIT", "GPL-3.0-only"): True,
("Apache-2.0", "MIT"): True,
("Apache-2.0", "Apache-2.0"): True,
("Apache-2.0", "GPL-3.0-only"): True, # Apache 2.0 → GPL 3.0 (compatible one-way)
("Apache-2.0", "GPL-2.0-only"): False, # NOT compatible
("GPL-3.0-only", "MIT"): True,
("GPL-3.0-only", "Apache-2.0"): True,
("GPL-3.0-only", "GPL-3.0-only"): True,
("GPL-2.0-only", "MIT"): True,
("GPL-2.0-only", "GPL-2.0-only"): True,
("GPL-2.0-only", "Apache-2.0"): False,
}
defcheck_license_compatibility(license_a: str, license_b: str,
combined_license: str = "") -> str:
key = (license_a, license_b)
if key in _COMPATIBLE:
ok = _COMPATIBLE[key]
if ok:
returnf"✓ {license_a} and {license_b} are compatible"else:
returnf"✗ {license_a} and {license_b} are NOT compatible — review obligations"# Try reverse
rev_key = (license_b, license_a)
if rev_key in _COMPATIBLE:
ok = _COMPATIBLE[rev_key]
if ok:
returnf"✓ {license_a} and {license_b} are compatible (reverse direction)"else:
returnf"✗ {license_a} and {license_b} are NOT compatible — review obligations"returnf"? No known compatibility data for {license_a} × {license_b}"# Example: npm package using MIT code inside an Apache-2.0 project
result = check_license_compatibility("MIT", "Apache-2.0")
print(result)
Setup / Configuration
Requirements
# core requirements
jinja2>=3.1 # template rendering for contracts
python-docx>=1.1 # .docx contract generation
weasyprint>=60 # PDF generation from HTML templates
cryptography>=41 # signature verification / document hashing
# config.yamlcompany:name:"Your Company"jurisdiction:"ID"# ISO country code for default governing lawregistered_address:""tax_id:""compliance:gdpr_representative:""# EU representative if outside EEAdpo_email:""# Data Protection Officer contactdmca_agent_name:""# Registered DMCA agent namedmca_agent_email:""# DMCA agent email for filingstemplates:default_language:"en"signature_lines:2include_recitals:true
Common Issues / Troubleshooting
Issue
Root Cause
Solution
Template variable not rendered
Missing key in data dict
Run jinja2.Environment undefined=DebugUndefined to surface missing keys
GDPR compliance gap detected
No DPA with subprocessors
Sign DPA with all cloud providers (AWS, Stripe, etc.) before processing begins
DMCA notice rejected by platform
Missing required fields per 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3)
Verify all 6 elements: work ID, infringing URL, contact, good faith, accuracy, signature
Contract signature line mismatch
Template configured for N signatures but only M parties exist
Set signature_lines to match number of parties in config
Add version field to YAML frontmatter of each template file
Cross-border data transfer not covered
Standard clauses missing for EU→non-EU transfers
Add Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) or Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) to DPA
Open source license incompatibility
Mixing GPL-2.0 code with Apache-2.0 project
Check compatibility matrix before adding dependencies; use LGPL or dual-license alternatives
Monetization
Approach
Timeframe
Description
Document Template Marketplace
2-4 weeks
Sell jurisdiction-specific contract templates (NDAs, SaaS terms, privacy policies) on Gumroad or GitHub Marketplace. Price per template: $29-$99.
Compliance-as-a-Service
1-3 months
Monthly subscription for GDPR/DMCA compliance monitoring. Includes quarterly review of privacy policies, data mapping updates, and breach notification templates. $200-$500/mo per client.
Contract Review Automation
2-6 weeks
Fixed-price engagement to audit existing contracts, build automated review checklists, and train team on template usage. $1,000-$5,000 per engagement.
IP Protection Audit
2-4 weeks
Audit client's IP portfolio — trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets. Deliver actionable protection roadmap and registration checklist. $2,000-$8,000 per audit.
DMCA Takedown Agency
Ongoing
Handle DMCA takedown notices for content creators and SaaS platforms. Per-takedown fee ($50-$200) or monthly retainer ($500-$2,000).
Employment Law Compliance Pack
1-3 weeks
Package of employment contracts, independent contractor agreements, and HR policy templates customized for Indonesian labor law (UU Cipta Kerja). $500-$2,000 per client.
