- name
- clickup-automation
- compatibility
- opencode
- completeness
- 95
- content-types
- ["guidance","examples","do-dont"]
- description
- Implements intelligent clickup automation with multi-factor skill selection, fallback chains, and adherence to the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense
- license
- MIT
- maturity
- stable
- metadata
- {"domain":"agent","output-format":"analysis","related-skills":"agent-confidence-based-selector, agent-task-routing","role":"orchestration","scope":"orchestration","triggers":"clickup-automation, clickup automation, how do i clickup-automation, orchestrate clickup-automation, automate clickup-automation, agent clickup-automation","archetypes":["orchestration","strategic"],"anti_triggers":["brainstorming","vague ideation","single-agent monolith"],"response_profile":{"verbosity":"medium","directive_strength":"high","abstraction_level":"tactical"}}
- version
- 1.0.0
# Clickup Automation
Orchestrates intelligent skill selection and execution for clickup automation workflows. Applies the 5 Laws of Elegant Defense to guide data naturally through the orchestration pipeline, preventing errors before they occur. Selects optimal skills based on multi-factor scoring including text similarity, historical performance, and system availability.
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Orchestration Flow │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
User Request
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Parse Request │
│ & Extract │
│ Features │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Evaluate Available Skills │
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Skill A │ │ Skill B │ │ Skill C │ │
│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │ - Match Score│ │
│ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │ - Confidence │ │
│ │ - History │ │ - History │ │ - History │ │
│ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ ↓ │
│ Select Best Skill │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Execute Skill │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────┐
│ Handle Result │
└────────┬────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Error Handling & Fallback │
│ │
│ Success? ────────► Return Result │
│ │
│ Fail? ────────┐ │
│ ↓ │
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Fallback Chain │ │
│ │ │ │
│ │ 1. Retry with adjusted parameters │ │
│ │ 2. Try Alternative Skill (if available) │ │
│ │ 3. Defer to Human Operator (if critical) │ │
│ │ 4. Log & Return Error │ │
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
## When to Use
Use this skill when:
- Orchestrating multi-step workflows that require skill delegation
- Implementing adaptive skill routing based on confidence scores
- Building fallback mechanisms for failed skill executions
- Creating intelligent task decomposition and parallel execution
- Designing skill dependency graphs with automatic resolution
- Implementing skill selection with historical performance weighting
- Building agent systems that need to self-organize around tasks
## When NOT to Use
Avoid this skill for:
- Direct task execution without orchestration needs - use individual skills instead
- High-frequency trading scenarios where latency must be minimized - the selection overhead may be prohibitive
- Simple linear workflows without branching or fallback requirements
- Cases where skill metadata is unavailable or unreliable
## Core Workflow
1. **Parse and Analyze Request** - Extract intent, entities, and constraints from user input.
**Checkpoint:** All required parameters must be present and in valid format before proceeding.
2. **Score Available Skills** - Calculate match scores using multi-factor algorithm:
- Text similarity between request and skill triggers
- Historical success rate for similar tasks
- Skill availability and health status
- Required dependencies and their availability
**Checkpoint:** Skip to fallback if no skill scores above threshold.
3. **Select Optimal Skill** - Choose skill with highest score that meets minimum confidence.
**Checkpoint:** Verify skill has not been disabled or deprecated.
4. **Execute with Fallback** - Run skill execution wrapped in retry and fallback logic.
**Checkpoint:** Log all execution attempts for audit trail.
5. **Return or Fallback** - Either return successful result or apply fallback chain:
- Retry with adjusted parameters
- Try alternative skill from `related-skills`
- Defer to human operator for critical tasks
**Checkpoint:** Record outcome with timing and confidence metadata.
## Implementation Patterns
### Pattern 1: Skill Selection Logic
```python
def route_clickup_action(
user_request: str,
workspace_id: str,
available_lists: List[Dict],
min_confidence: float = 0.7
) -> Optional[Dict]:
"""Route a natural language request to the appropriate ClickUp action.
Validates workspace access, extracts intent (create/update/comment),
and matches against available ClickUp lists/tasks.
"""
# Guard clause - Early Exit (Law 1)
if not user_request or not workspace_id:
raise ValueError("Request and workspace_id are required")
# Parse intent and extract entities at boundary (Law 2)
intent = _extract_clickup_intent(user_request)
target_list_id = _resolve_list_id(user_request, available_lists)
if intent not in ("create_task", "update_status", "add_comment", "assign"):
return None
# Score available actions based on list availability and historical success
best_action = None
best_score = 0.0
for action in available_actions:
score = _calculate_action_match(intent, target_list_id, action)
if score > best_score and score >= min_confidence:
best_score = score
best_action = action
if not best_action:
return None
# Atomic Predictability (Law 3) - Return new dict, don't mutate
return {
"action": best_action["type"],
"target_list_id": target_list_id,
"workspace_id": workspace_id,
"confidence": best_score,
"timestamp": time.time()
}
```
### Pattern 2: Execution with Fallback
```python
def execute_clickup_operation(
action_config: Dict,
api_key: str,
max_retries: int = 2
) -> Dict:
"""Execute a ClickUp API operation with resilience patterns.
Handles rate limits, transient network errors, and implements
a fallback chain: direct API -> webhook queue -> manual sync log.
"""
base_url = f"https://api.clickup.com/api/v2"
headers = {"Authorization": api_key, "Content-Type": "application/json"}
for attempt in range(max_retries + 1):
try:
if action_config["action"] == "create_task":
payload = {"name": action_config["task_name"], "description": action_config.get("desc", "")}
response = requests.post(f"{base_url}/list/{action_config['target_list_id']}/task", headers=headers, json=payload)
elif action_config["action"] == "update_status":
payload = {"status": action_config["new_status"]}
response = requests.put(f"{base_url}/task/{action_config['task_id']}", headers=headers, json=payload)
else:
raise ValueError(f"Unsupported action: {action_config['action']}")
response.raise_for_status()
return {
"success": True,
"clickup_id": response.json().get("id"),
"attempts": attempt + 1,
"latency_ms": time.time() * 1000
}
except requests.exceptions.HTTPError as e:
if e.response.status_code == 429:
time.sleep(2 ** attempt) # Exponential backoff
continue
raise ClickUpAPIError(f"ClickUp API failed: {e}") from e
except requests.exceptions.ConnectionError:
if attempt == max_retries:
return _queue_for_manual_sync(action_config)
# Fail Loud (Law 4) - All retries exhausted
raise ClickUpAPIError(f"Failed after {max_retries + 1} attempts")
```
### MUST DO
- Always validate skill metadata before selection (Early Exit)
- Implement fallback chain with at least 2 levels (Fallback Skill + Human)
- Log all skill selections with full context for auditability
- Return new data structures instead of mutating inputs (Atomic Predictability)
- Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states
- Update confidence scores after each execution for adaptive routing
- Reference `code-philosophy` (5 Laws of Elegant Defense) in all logic
### MUST NOT DO
- Select skills based on a single factor (e.g., only confidence score)
- Disable fallback mechanisms "temporarily" - this creates fragile systems
- Skip validation of skill dependencies before execution
- Return partial results - either complete success or clear failure
- Use magic numbers for confidence thresholds - make them configurable
- Cache skill selections without considering context changes
## TL;DR Checklist
- [ ] Parse all inputs at boundary before processing (Law 2)
- [ ] Handle edge cases with early returns at function top (Law 1)
- [ ] Fail immediately with descriptive errors on invalid states (Law 4)
- [ ] Return new data structures, never mutate inputs (Law 3)
- [ ] Implement minimum 2-level fallback chain for all skill executions
- [ ] Log all skill selections with context for full audit trail
- [ ] Validate skill metadata and dependencies before selection
- [ ] Update confidence scores after each execution for learning
## TL;DR for Code Generation
- Use guard clauses - return early on invalid input before doing work
- Return simple types (dict, str, int, bool, list) - avoid complex nested objects
- Cyclomatic complexity < 10 per function - split anything larger
- Handle null/empty cases explicitly at function top (Early Exit)
- Never mutate input parameters - return new dicts/objects
- Fail fast with descriptive errors - don't try to "patch" bad data
- Reference code-philosophy laws in comments for complex logic
- Include timing and confidence metadata in all return values
## Output Template
When applying this skill, produce:
1. **Selected Skills** - List of skill names with confidence scores
2. **Selection Rationale** - Why each skill was chosen (match score, history, availability)
3. **Execution Plan** - Order of execution with dependencies
4. **Fallback Strategy** - Which fallback skills will be tried and in what order
5. **Risk Assessment** - Any potential failure points and their impact
6. **Timing Estimates** - Expected latency including fallback scenarios
---
## Constraints
### MUST DO
- Implement idempotent automation triggers: running the same automation twice should not create duplicate resources or actions
- Validate all trigger conditions with explicit allowlists before executing automated actions
- Include rollback procedures in every automation workflow — every CREATE should have a corresponding DELETE capability
- Log all automation executions with input state, output state, duration, and any errors for monitoring and debugging
### MUST NOT DO
- Do not create circular automation loops where trigger A causes action B which triggers A again
- Avoid using automations that modify production data without explicit human approval gates
- Never embed API keys or credentials directly in automation workflows — use vaulted secrets with rotation
- Do not assume external service availability; implement retry logic with exponential backoff and dead-letter queues
## Related Skills
| Skill | Purpose |
|
Auf GitHub ansehen