Use when drafting legal-review-ready AI-agent BAA or DPA addendum clauses for service-principal access, audit logs, kill switch, memory, subprocessors, training exclusion, breach, and transfers. Use HIPAA control pack for controls and privacy-doc-set for the parent set.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
Use when drafting legal-review-ready AI-agent BAA or DPA addendum clauses for service-principal access, audit logs, kill switch, memory, subprocessors, training exclusion, breach, and transfers. Use HIPAA control pack for controls and privacy-doc-set for the parent set.
Use when drafting legal-review-ready AI-agent BAA or DPA addendum clauses for service-principal access, audit logs, kill switch, memory, subprocessors, training exclusion, breach, and transfers. Use HIPAA control pack for controls and privacy-doc-set for the parent set.
Do Not Use When
Do not use as a substitute for legal review — these are drop-in templates that the parent BAA / DPA owner adapts. Do not use unedited; the legal team shall review.
Do not use this skill to fabricate missing project facts, legal conclusions, test results, approvals, or certification claims.
Required Inputs
Artefact
Source or provider
Required?
Missing-input behaviour
Target sources: Parent BAA template, parent DPA template, AI Agent Architecture Spec, Action Catalogue Spec, AI Agent Responsible-AI Addendum, AI Agent Compliance Policy Pack, AI Agent SLO Doc, AI Agent Runbook, AI Data Flow + DPIA, AI HIPAA Control Pack (if PHI in scope), sub-processor list.
Project owner, approved workspace artefacts, or accountable control owner
Yes
Stop dependent claims; list the missing item, owner, and consequence. For review checks, record .
not assessed
Scope, audience, baseline/version, and accountable decision owner
Requester or project context
Yes
Ask for or record the gap; do not infer authority or scope.
Capability and permission boundaries
Default to read-only. Read and search access to the supplied artefacts are required. Editing is limited to an explicitly authorised requested draft or project files. Execute validation only when authorised; publishing, signature, certification, production mutation, destructive action, spending, and risk acceptance require explicit authority.
Degraded Mode
When files, tools, network, rendering, fonts, execution, or evidence are unavailable, return the narrowest useful qualified draft or finding set. Name every unavailable check and its consequence; an unassessed check is never a pass. Preserve evidence already gathered and provide the exact next verification step.
Decision Rules
Condition
Action
Failure or risk avoided
Lawful basis, jurisdiction, data flow, or legal owner is unverified
Stop publication or signature and request legal/privacy review
Invalid privacy or contract claim
Residual high risk remains after controls
Escalate to the accountable authority; do not self-certify
Unauthorised risk acceptance
Workflow
Confirm the requested artefact, audience, scope, decision owner, and applicable baseline or version. Work read-only by default; source mutation, publication, signature, certification, production change, or risk acceptance requires explicit authority.
Inspect every required input and record missing, stale, conflicting, or inaccessible evidence. Stop claims that depend on an unresolved required input.
Apply the Decision Rules, then execute the existing Core Instructions below in order; preserve project terminology and trace each material statement to its source.
Test the draft against the output acceptance conditions and domain quality standards. If a check cannot run, mark it not assessed and never convert it into a pass.
On failure, recover by preserving completed evidence, identifying the narrowest corrective action and owner, and rerunning only the affected checks before handoff.
Produce the named artefact and evidence record; publish, sign, certify, mutate production, or accept risk only under explicit authority.
Outputs
Artefact
Consumer
Observable acceptance condition
AI Agent BAA and Data-Processing Language
Accountable reviewer, control owner, auditor, or release authority
Every drop-in clause shall be self-contained, referenced to a control in the relevant control pack, and signable as an addendum. Cross-jurisdiction language shall name the transfer mechanism. Breach notification clauses shall name the timeline and the recipient. Sub-processor change clauses shall name the notice period.
Gap and decision record
Accountable owner and downstream reviewer
Every gap has status, impact, owner, next action, and no unsupported pass or approval.
Evidence Produced
Evidence
Contents
Acceptance condition
AI Agent BAA and Data-Processing Language evidence record
Source identifiers, scope/version, decisions, checks, exceptions, and approval state
A reviewer can reproduce each material conclusion from named sources.
Validation record
Check, result (pass, fail, or not assessed), evidence location, date, and actor
No required check is omitted or silently treated as passed.
Quality Standards
Every drop-in clause shall be self-contained, referenced to a control in the relevant control pack, and signable as an addendum. Cross-jurisdiction language shall name the transfer mechanism. Breach notification clauses shall name the timeline and the recipient. Sub-processor change clauses shall name the notice period.
Use deterministic acceptance conditions and preserve traceability from source to decision and output.
Separate facts, inferences, assumptions, and approvals; never present one as another.
Apply 28-anti-ai-slop during authoring and 29-ai-slop-audit at major checkpoints and release.
Anti-Patterns
Producing AI Agent BAA and Data-Processing Language from assumptions instead of named project sources. Fix: Cite the source or mark the item unverified.
Treating a missing or inaccessible check as passed. Fix: Mark it not assessed, state impact, and block dependent claims.
Using vague gates such as adequate, secure, or user-friendly. Fix: Replace each with an observable criterion, threshold, and evidence source.
Copying a generic template without product, control, role, version, or jurisdiction detail. Fix: Ground every section in the supplied context and remove unused boilerplate.
Publishing, signing, certifying, changing production, or accepting risk without authority. Fix: Prepare a draft and route the decision to the accountable owner.
Listing evidence without provenance or an acceptance result. Fix: Record source, period, integrity check, mapping, and pass/fail/not-assessed status.
Worked Example
Example: if lawful basis, jurisdiction, data flow, or legal owner is unverified, stop publication or signature and request legal/privacy review. Record the evidence and result in the validation record; this avoids invalid privacy or contract claim.
Two drop-in contract addenda for agent processing:
BAA Addendum — extends the parent Business Associate Agreement with agent-specific obligations under HIPAA §164.504(e).
DPA Addendum — extends the parent Data Processing Agreement with agent-specific obligations under GDPR Art. 28 and the African DPA regimes (Kenya DPA s.40; Nigeria NDP Act 2023 Art. 29; South Africa POPIA s.21; Uganda DPPA 2019 s.24; Rwanda DP Law 2021 Art. 25).
HIPAA §164.504(e); GDPR Art. 28; KE DPA 2019 s.40; NDP Act 2023 Art. 29; POPIA s.21; UG DPPA 2019 s.24; RW DP Law 2021 Art. 25
Core Instructions
Step 1: Identify the regulatory regime
For each tenant determine: HIPAA (covered entity in US healthcare); GDPR (EU/EEA/UK data subjects); KE DPA; NG NDPR / NDP Act; ZA POPIA; UG DPPA; RW DP Law; combinations.
Step 2: Common agent-distinctive obligations
Across all regimes, the addenda shall cover:
Agent service-principal access — the agent is a named service principal scoped to the tenant; least privilege; quarterly access review.
Reversibility and approval — irreversible-class tool calls require human approval; signed event.
Audit-log retention — per the retention table; hash-chain integrity; tenant audit export on request.
Kill-switch SLA — propagation ≤ 5 s; per-tenant kill-switch available to tenant admin and processor on-call.
Memory erasure — tenant-controlled memory tier opt-in; erasure on request within 30 days; certificate of erasure.
Sub-processor change — 30-day notice for material change to model provider or other sub-processor; right to object.
Training-data exclusion — provider commitment that tenant data does not train provider models; evidence available on request.
Breach notification — timeline per regime (HIPAA ≤ 60 days; GDPR ≤ 72 hours to controller).
Cross-jurisdiction transfers — named transfer mechanism (DPF / SCCs + TIA / adequacy / data-residency).
In-product disclosure — tenant-admin and end-user agent disclosure shown in product.
Sub-processors — Art. 28(2) general written authorisation plus 30-day notice for new sub-processors; right to object.
Data subject rights — controller assistance under Arts. 12-22 including erasure of agent memory.
Breach notification — ≤ 72 hours to controller per Art. 33.
DPIA assistance — Art. 35 assistance; cross-link to AI Data Flow + DPIA.
Audit rights — controller right to audit; processor right to provide SOC 2 / ISO certifications in lieu of audit (with caveat).
International transfers — DPF where applicable; SCCs + TIA + supplementary measures otherwise.
Deletion at termination — agent memory and action history deletion or return.
Step 5: African DPA annexes
Regime
Specifics
Kenya DPA 2019
Data Commissioner notification per s.43; data residency expectation; ODPC AI guidance overlay (2024); cross-border transfer per s.49
Nigeria NDP Act 2023
NDPC notification; lawful basis under Art. 25; cross-border under Schedule; NDPC AI advisory overlay
South Africa POPIA
Information Regulator notification; s.71 automated decision-making protections (right to object, right to explanation); cross-border under s.72
Uganda DPPA 2019
PDPO notification per s.23; immediate breach notification standard; data residency considerations
Rwanda DP Law 2021
NCSA notification; cross-border under Art. 48
Step 6: Cross-jurisdiction transfer mechanisms
Declare per direction:
EU → US: DPF certified; SCCs Module 2 with TIA and supplementary measures fallback.
EU → KE / NG / ZA: SCCs + adequacy assessment.
US → EU: GDPR-compliant processor language.
Intra-Africa: per bilateral adequacy where present; SCCs + adequacy assessment otherwise.
Step 7: Signature blocks
Per addendum: tenant authorised signatory + processor authorised signatory + effective date + version. Counter-signature on amendments.
Step 8: Write the addenda
AI_Agent_BAA_Addendum.md: sections 1-10 plus signature block.
AI_Agent_DPA_Addendum.md: sections 1-10 plus signature block.
annexes/<region>.md: per-region annex with the specifics from Step 5.
Standards
HIPAA §164.504(e); §164.314
GDPR Art. 28; Art. 32-36
Kenya DPA 2019 s.40, s.43, s.49
Nigeria NDP Act 2023 Art. 28-29; Schedule
South Africa POPIA s.21, s.71, s.72
Uganda DPPA 2019 s.23, s.24
Rwanda DP Law 2021 Art. 25, Art. 48
EU SCCs (Commission Implementing Decision 2021/914)
