Skip to main content

codex-implement

Delegate implementation of a TRIP plan (or a scoped part of it) to Codex CLI

Quellinformationen

Repository
PiLastDigit/TRIP-workflow
Letzte Quellaktivität
24. September 2026 um 05:19
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
635
Forks
91

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
8 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
codex-implement
description
Delegate implementation of a TRIP plan (or a scoped part of it) to Codex CLI
argument-hint
<plan-path> [instructions] | reset <plan-path> | show <plan-path>
metadata
{"trip-version":"2.8.4"}
# Codex Implement Non-interactive implementation via Codex CLI in a **workspace-write** sandbox: Codex reads the plan, edits the working tree directly, runs the project's lint/build on its own work, and reports back. One persistent thread per target, so a plan can be delegated in successive batches (or phase by phase) with full context retained. State persisted under `.claude/skills/codex-implement/state/<sanitized-target>.{thread,review.txt,events.ndjson}` (the `.review.txt` file holds Codex's implementation **report** — the naming comes from the shared helpers). All operations go through this skill's own `scripts/` wrappers: `start.sh` is a dedicated workspace-write script, while `resume`/`reset`/`show` pin the correct `STATE_DIR` and delegate to the shared `codex-plan-review` implementation — so there is no `export` to remember (a forgotten export would silently operate on a review thread instead of the implementation thread). ## Arguments - `<target>` — auto: start if no thread, resume if one exists. Usually a plan path (`docs/1-plans/F_*.plan.md`); a free-form label for unplanned work. - Optional trailing instructions — scope control appended to the prompt, e.g. `"Implement only: <batch checkboxes>"` or `"Now implement: <next batch>"`. - `reset <target>` — drop state, next call starts fresh. - `show <target>` — display the latest report without calling Codex. ## Execution 1. **Parse `$ARGUMENTS`**: extract action (`reset`/`show`/auto) and target. 2. **Auto** — try `start.sh` first (exit code 2 = thread exists → use `resume.sh`): - **Start**: `bash .claude/skills/codex-implement/scripts/start.sh --prompt-file .claude/skills/codex-implement/prompts/implement.tpl <target> [instructions]` - **Resume** (next batch / additional scope): `bash .claude/skills/codex-implement/scripts/resume.sh --prompt-file .claude/skills/codex-implement/prompts/continue.tpl [--notes "review corrections"] <target> [instructions]` 3. **Reset**: `bash .claude/skills/codex-implement/scripts/reset.sh <target>` 4. **Show**: `bash .claude/skills/codex-implement/scripts/show.sh <target>` 5. **Parse trailing tag** of the report: - `IMPLEMENTATION_COMPLETE` — hand control back to the requester's batch review (TRIP-2). - `IMPLEMENTATION_PARTIAL` — read the report; resume with instructions for the remainder, or let the requester finish small leftovers directly. ## Notes - **Run Codex calls in a background shell.** Invoke `start.sh` / `resume.sh` via the Bash tool with `run_in_background: true` — never as a foreground/inline command. Implementation runs are the longest Codex calls in the workflow and will outlast the foreground command timeout; the background task notifies on completion, then read its output. `reset.sh` / `show.sh` are instant and fine in the foreground. - **Set `CODEX_TIMEOUT=7200`** (2 h) when invoking `start.sh` / `resume.sh` — a circuit breaker against hung runs only, deliberately far above any normal batch; bump higher for unusually large batches rather than risk a mid-run kill. Script default is `0` = no timeout. A timeout here kills Codex while it is editing the tree, leaving a partially modified working state — inspect via `git status` / `git diff` before retrying. - `--sandbox workspace-write` on start; `codex exec resume` inherits it. Codex edits files and runs repo commands (lint/build); no network, no commits. - **Fixes are the requester's job.** After Codex reports, the requester (TRIP-2 batch review) fixes problems directly in the tree — do NOT ping-pong fixes back to Codex. Resume only for genuinely new scope (next batch, large remainder), passing what was fixed and why via `--notes`. - Separate `STATE_DIR` from the review skills — the same plan path can hold an implementation thread and a review thread without collision. - Codex is instructed not to write tests (testing gate owns that) and not to touch release ceremony. - Network is blocked in the sandbox: if the plan requires installing a new dependency, Codex will report it as a leftover — install it yourself during the batch review. - Model/effort/tier defaults live in `codex-plan-review/scripts/_common.sh`, derived from `STATE_DIR`: implementation → gpt-6-luna at high effort on the fast service tier; plan review → gpt-6-astra at xhigh on standard routing; code review → gpt-6-sol at xhigh on the fast tier; codex-ask → gpt-6-astra at xhigh on standard routing. Adjust that one file to your preferred models, or override per run via `CODEX_MODEL` / `CODEX_EFFORT` / `CODEX_TIER` env vars; the scripts echo the effective values. - **Effort escalation (per batch).** high is the default because plan batches are well-scoped and every batch passes through the requester's delta review plus the final full code review. Escalate a single batch to xhigh (`CODEX_EFFORT=xhigh` on that batch's `start.sh`/`resume.sh` call) when it involves any of: - **novel core logic** designed from scratch — an algorithm, data structure, protocol, or state machine with no existing pattern in the codebase to follow; - **changes the testing gate can't meaningfully verify** — correctness only observable at runtime or by inspection, with no automated check covering it; - **concurrency, security, or data-integrity-sensitive code** — where a subtle slip is costly and hard to spot in review; - **cross-cutting changes** — one batch touching many files or layers whose interactions must stay coherent. When none apply, stay at high — a slipped batch is caught and fixed directly in the delta review.
Auf GitHub ansehen