Skip to main content

excellence-gradient

Measure quality. Descend toward excellence. No binary gates—only vectors.

Quellinformationen

Repository
plurigrid/asi
Letzte Quellaktivität
16. Februar 2026 um 01:58
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
67
Forks
12

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
excellence-gradient
description
Measure quality. Descend toward excellence. No binary gates—only vectors.
version
1.0.0
# Excellence Gradient **Trit**: -1 (VALIDATOR - measures, constrains, reduces toward optimum) ## Core Principle Quality is not a gate—it's a gradient. Binary pass/fail obscures the path to excellence. Measure everything. Descend continuously toward the minimum of the loss function: distance from ideal. ## The Airlock Principle **The airlock should not eat the air.** Validation exists to protect value, not consume it. If your quality gates: - Take longer than the work they validate → **broken** - Block more than they enable → **broken** - Cost more than the bugs they catch → **broken** - Kill momentum instead of channeling it → **broken** ``` Cost(validation) << Value(protected) Time(gate) << Time(work) Friction(process) < Momentum(team) airlock_efficiency = value_protected / momentum_consumed # Target: efficiency > 10x # If < 1x: gate eats more than it saves → remove or automate ``` The airlock is a *membrane*, not a wall. It regulates flow, doesn't stop it. ## Quality Lineage | Pioneer | Contribution | Key Metric | |---------|-------------|------------| | **Deming** | 14 Points, PDCA | Variation reduction | | **Juran** | Pareto principle, Quality Trilogy | Cost of poor quality | | **Ohno** | Toyota Production System | Lead time, waste (muda) | | **Shingo** | Poka-yoke, SMED | Defects approaching zero | | **Crosby** | Zero defects, Quality is free | Price of non-conformance | ## Excellence Temperature (τ) Distance from optimal. Lower is better. τ = 0 is perfection. ```python def excellence_temperature(metrics: dict) -> float: """ τ ∈ [0, ∞) where τ → 0 as quality → perfect Analogous to simulated annealing: high τ = chaos, low τ = crystallized excellence """ weights = { 'coverage': 0.20, # Test coverage 'latency': 0.15, # P99 response time 'satisfaction': 0.25, # User NPS/CSAT 'debt_ratio': 0.20, # Technical debt / LOC 'defect_rate': 0.20, # Defects per KLOC } # Normalize each to [0,1] where 0 = optimal τ = sum(weights[k] * distance_from_optimal(k, v) for k, v in metrics.items()) return τ ``` ## Measurable Excellence Criteria ### 1. Code Quality Metrics | Metric | Formula | Target | Critical | |--------|---------|--------|----------| | **Coverage** | `tested_lines / total_lines` | ≥ 0.80 | < 0.60 | | **Complexity** | Cyclomatic per function | ≤ 10 | > 20 | | **Duplication** | `dup_lines / total_lines` | ≤ 0.03 | > 0.10 | | **Debt Ratio** | `remediation_time / dev_time` | ≤ 0.05 | > 0.20 | | **Doc Coverage** | `documented / public_symbols` | ≥ 0.90 | < 0.50 | ### 2. Performance Metrics | Metric | Formula | Target | Critical | |--------|---------|--------|----------| | **P50 Latency** | 50th percentile | ≤ 100ms | > 500ms | | **P99 Latency** | 99th percentile | ≤ 500ms | > 2000ms | | **Error Rate** | `errors / requests` | ≤ 0.001 | > 0.01 | | **Availability** | Uptime % | ≥ 99.9% | < 99.0% | | **Throughput** | RPS at P99 SLO | ≥ baseline×1.2 | < baseline | ### 3. User Satisfaction Metrics | Metric | Formula | Target | Critical | |--------|---------|--------|----------| | **NPS** | promoters - detractors | ≥ 50 | < 0 | | **CSAT** | satisfied / respondents | ≥ 0.85 | < 0.70 | | **Task Success** | completed / attempted | ≥ 0.95 | < 0.80 | | **Time to Value** | signup → first value | ≤ 5min | > 30min | | **Churn** | lost / total per period | ≤ 0.02/mo | > 0.10/mo | ### 4. Technical Debt Indicators | Metric | Formula | Target | Critical | |--------|---------|--------|----------| | **TODO Count** | grep -r TODO | ≤ 10 | > 100 | | **Dependency Age** | avg months since update | ≤ 6 | > 24 | | **Security Vulns** | CVE count (high/critical) | 0 | > 0 | | **Dead Code** | unreachable / total | ≤ 0.01 | > 0.05 | | **Build Time** | CI pipeline duration | ≤ 10min | > 30min | ## Gradient Descent Protocol ```python def descend_toward_excellence(current_state: Metrics) -> Action: """ Not binary pass/fail. Continuous improvement via gradient. """ τ = excellence_temperature(current_state) gradient = compute_gradient(current_state) # Priority = steepest descent direction worst_metric = max(gradient.items(), key=lambda x: x[1]) return Action( focus=worst_metric[0], expected_τ_reduction=worst_metric[1], effort_estimate=effort_model(worst_metric[0]) ) def compute_gradient(state: Metrics) -> dict: """ ∂τ/∂metric for each metric Higher gradient = faster improvement opportunity """ return { metric: partial_derivative(excellence_temperature, metric, state) for metric in state.keys() } ``` ## Anti-Patterns Detection ### Code Anti-Patterns ```python ANTI_PATTERNS = { 'god_class': lambda c: c.methods > 20 or c.lines > 500, 'feature_envy': lambda m: external_calls(m) > internal_calls(m) * 2, 'shotgun_surgery': lambda f: len(dependents(f)) > 10, 'primitive_obsession': lambda c: primitive_params(c) > 5, 'speculative_generality': lambda c: unused_abstractions(c) > 0, 'dead_code': lambda f: call_count(f) == 0 and not exported(f), 'copy_paste': lambda b: similar_blocks(b) > 2, } def detect_anti_patterns(codebase) -> list[Violation]: violations = [] for name, detector in ANTI_PATTERNS.items(): for entity in codebase.entities(): if detector(entity): violations.append(Violation( pattern=name, location=entity.location, severity=PATTERN_SEVERITY[name], fix_effort=PATTERN_EFFORT[name] )) return sorted(violations, key=lambda v: v.severity, reverse=True) ``` ### Process Anti-Patterns | Anti-Pattern | Detection Signal | Response | |-------------|-----------------|----------| | **Heroics** | 1 person on all critical paths | Distribute knowledge | | **Scope Creep** | Requirements grow > 20%/sprint | Freeze and ship | | **Gold Plating** | Features beyond spec | Ship MVP, iterate | | **Analysis Paralysis** | > 2 weeks without shipping | Timebox decisions | | **Bikeshedding** | > 30min on trivial choices | Executive decision | | **NIH Syndrome** | Rewriting solved problems | Adopt proven solutions | ## GF(3) Triads ``` # Excellence Gradient Bundle (VALIDATOR ⊗ COORDINATOR ⊗ GENERATOR = 0) excellence-gradient (-1) ⊗ chromatic-walk (0) ⊗ refuse-mediocrity (+1) = 0 ✓ [Quality Pursuit] excellence-gradient (-1) ⊗ unworld (0) ⊗ refuse-mediocrity (+1) = 0 ✓ [Standard Derivation] excellence-gradient (-1) ⊗ kinetic-block (0) ⊗ refuse-mediocrity (+1) = 0 ✓ [Momentum Measure] excellence-gradient (-1) ⊗ implicit-coordination (0) ⊗ refuse-mediocrity (+1) = 0 ✓ [Parallel Quality] excellence-gradient (-1) ⊗ topos-catcolab (0) ⊗ refuse-mediocrity (+1) = 0 ✓ [Collaborative Excellence] # With other generators excellence-gradient (-1) ⊗ acsets (0) ⊗ gay-mcp (+1) = 0 ✓ [Metric Coloring] excellence-gradient (-1) ⊗ open-games (0) ⊗ agent-o-rama (+1) = 0 ✓ [Quality Games] excellence-gradient (-1) ⊗ cognitive-surrogate (0) ⊗ koopman-generator (+1) = 0 ✓ [Learning Dynamics] ``` ## Commands ```bash # Compute current excellence temperature just excellence-τ # Run full quality audit just quality-audit # Detect anti-patterns just anti-patterns # Gradient descent: suggest next improvement just descend # Compare τ over time just τ-history --days 30 ``` ## Implementation ```bash #!/usr/bin/env bash # excellence-gradient.sh compute_excellence_temperature() { coverage=$(just coverage-report | grep -oP '\d+\.\d+') latency_p99=$(just latency-p99) debt_ratio=$(just tech-debt-ratio) defect_rate=$(just defect-rate) # Weighted sum (lower = better) τ=$(python3 -c " weights = [0.25, 0.20, 0.30, 0.25] metrics = [$((100 - coverage))/100, $latency_p99/2000, $debt_ratio, $defect_rate] print(sum(w*m for w,m in zip(weights, metrics))) ") echo "τ = $τ" } ``` ## The Validator Role (-1) This skill is MINUS because it **constrains and measures**: - Measures distance from excellence - Detects deviations (anti-patterns) - Provides gradient direction (what to fix next) - Validates improvements (τ decreased?) Without measurement, "excellence" is just opinion. With measurement, it's navigation. ## Deming's 14 Points (Selected) 1. **Constancy of purpose** → Track τ daily 2. **Cease dependence on inspection** → Build quality in 3. **Drive out fear** → Measure to improve, not punish 4. **Break down barriers** → Shared metrics, shared goals 5. **Eliminate slogans** → Replace with measurable targets ## The Equation ``` Excellence = lim(t→∞) descent(τ₀, gradient, t) Where: - τ₀ = starting temperature - gradient = ∇τ (direction of steepest improvement) - t = iterations of PDCA ``` ## One Rule **If you can't measure it, you can't improve it. If τ isn't decreasing, you're not improving.** ## Scientific Skill Interleaving This skill connects to the K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills ecosystem: ### Autodiff - **jax** [○] via bicomodule - Hub for autodiff/ML ### Bibliography References - `general`: 734 citations in bib.duckdb ## Cat# Integration This skill maps to **Cat# = Comod(P)** as a bicomodule in the equipment structure: ``` Trit: 0 (ERGODIC) Home: Prof Poly Op: ⊗ Kan Role: Adj Color: #26D826 ``` ### GF(3) Naturality The skill participates in triads satisfying: ``` (-1) + (0) + (+1) ≡ 0 (mod 3) ``` This ensures compositional coherence in the Cat# equipment structure.
Auf GitHub ansehen