Skip to main content

code-red

Employment crisis intervention - navigate PIPs, HR conflicts, and termination risk

Quellinformationen

Repository
reggiechan74/JobOps
Letzte Quellaktivität
28. Mai 2026 um 13:24
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
25
Forks
4

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
code-red
description
Employment crisis intervention - navigate PIPs, HR conflicts, and termination risk
disable-model-invocation
true
## Configuration Read `.jobops/config.json`. If missing, stop with: > JOBOPS NOT CONFIGURED > Run /jobops:setup to initialize your workspace. Use `config.directories.<key>` for all file paths in this skill. Use `config.preferences.cultural_profile` if this skill generates resume-style content. Use `config.preferences.default_jurisdiction` if this skill has jurisdiction-sensitive logic (crisis/legal skills accept `--jurisdiction=<ISO-3166-2>` to override). ## Default Jurisdiction: Ontario, Canada This command defaults to **Ontario, Canada** employment law framework. Key principles: - **No At-Will Employment**: Unlike US states, Canadian employees cannot be terminated without cause or reasonable notice (common law or statutory) - **Notice Periods**: Employees entitled to common law reasonable notice (often 1 month per year of service, up to 24 months) OR Employment Standards Act (ESA) minimums - **Just Cause**: Employers must prove serious misconduct for termination without notice - a very high bar - **Human Rights**: Ontario Human Rights Code protects against discrimination (broader protections than US federal law) - **Constructive Dismissal**: Significant changes to job duties, compensation, or working conditions may constitute wrongful dismissal **For US users**: Specify `--jurisdiction=US` or mention your state. US employment is generally at-will with different statutory frameworks (Title VII, ADEA, ADA). ## Important Disclaimers **CRITICAL**: Read these disclaimers ALOUD to the user at session start: 1. **Not Legal Advice**: This guidance is strategic, not legal. For legally complex situations (discrimination claims, wrongful termination, harassment), recommend consultation with an employment attorney. 2. **No Outcome Guarantees**: Employment situations are unpredictable. Strategies improve positioning but cannot guarantee results. 3. **Confidentiality Reminder**: Be cautious about what you share. This conversation may be discoverable in legal proceedings. 4. **Documentation**: Save all workplace communications. BCC personal email where appropriate. ## Modes of Operation Parse the mode from arguments: - `--mode=assess` (default): Full intake, interview, and situation analysis - `--mode=respond`: Draft response to specific HR communication - `--mode=plan`: Create action plan for upcoming meeting or deadline - `--mode=exit`: Focus on exit strategy and job transition If no mode specified, default to `assess` (full process). ## Input Documents **Argument Handling**: - If `$1` is provided: Load specified file or folder - If `$1` not provided: Ask user what documents they have available **Accepted Document Types**: - HR communications (emails, letters, written warnings) - Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) - Performance reviews - Employment contracts, offer letters - Employee handbook excerpts - Meeting notes or transcripts - Incident reports or complaints - Job description (current role) **Load Career Context**: - Check for `{config.directories.resume_source}/` for career history context - If career context would help, read `{config.directories.resume_source}/Identity/CurrentRole.md` and the most-recent `WorkHistory/NN_*.md` file. Do NOT attempt to load `candidate_profile.json` — that artifact is removed in v2.2.0. If source files are missing entirely (emergency mode, no folder), proceed with user-supplied facts only. ## Phase 1: Intake & Document Analysis ### 1.1 Load and Catalog Documents @$1 Read all provided documents. Create an inventory: ``` DOCUMENT INVENTORY ================== | # | Document Type | Date | From | Key Content | |---|---------------|------|------|-------------| | 1 | [Type] | [Date] | [Sender] | [Summary] | ``` ### 1.2 Extract Timeline of Events From documents, construct chronological timeline: ``` EVENT TIMELINE ============== [Date] - [Event] - [Source document] [Date] - [Event] - [Source document] ... ``` Identify: - **Triggering Event**: What started this situation? - **Escalation Points**: When did things get worse? - **Current Status**: Where are we now? - **Upcoming Deadlines**: What's time-sensitive? ### 1.3 Identify Key Players ``` KEY PLAYERS =========== | Name | Role | Relationship | Stance | Notes | |------|------|--------------|--------|-------| | [Name] | Manager/HR/Witness | [Context] | Ally/Neutral/Adversary | [Observations] | ``` ### 1.4 Flag Legally Significant Language Scan documents for: - **Termination Indicators**: "Final warning", "failure to improve", "separation" - **Protected Class References**: Any mention of age, gender, race, disability, pregnancy, religion - **Retaliation Patterns**: Timing relative to complaints, protected activities - **Policy Violations**: Company policy violations by either party - **Inconsistent Treatment**: Evidence of different treatment vs. peers - **Promises or Commitments**: Verbal or written commitments not honored ## Phase 2: Structured Candidate Interview **CRITICAL**: This interview must be conducted before analysis. Use the AskUserQuestion tool or conversational questions to gather this information. ### 2.1 Situation Assessment Questions Ask the user: 1. **"Walk me through what happened from your perspective. Start from when you first noticed something was wrong."** 2. **"What do you believe is the root cause of this situation?"** - Performance issue (real or perceived)? - Personality conflict? - Organizational change (new manager, restructuring)? - Retaliation for something? - Discrimination concern? - Other? 3. **"Were there any changes before this started?"** - New manager? - Reorganization? - Your complaint about something? - Requested accommodation? - Return from leave? ### 2.2 Relationship Context Questions 4. **"Describe your relationship with your manager BEFORE this started."** - How long working together? - Previous performance feedback? - Any prior conflicts? 5. **"Who else is involved or aware of this situation?"** - HR contacts? - Skip-level manager? - Colleagues who witnessed events? - Union representative? 6. **"Are there witnesses who would support your account?"** - Colleagues? - Former employees? - Written documentation from others? ### 2.3 Protected Class Screening (Handle Sensitively) **Frame carefully**: "These questions help identify if there may be legal protections relevant to your situation." 7. **"Have you observed any patterns in how you're treated compared to colleagues in similar roles?"** - Different expectations? - Harsher criticism? - Excluded from opportunities? 8. **"Any recent life events that may be relevant?"** - Medical condition or disability? - Pregnancy or family leave? - Age-related comments? - Religious accommodation requests? - Reported harassment or misconduct? **If protected class indicators emerge**: Note for legal consultation recommendation. ### 2.4 Documentation Gap Assessment 9. **"What important conversations happened that AREN'T in writing?"** - Verbal warnings? - Promises made? - Explanations given? - Threats or pressure? 10. **"Do you have any personal documentation?"** - Emails (including sent items)? - Text messages? - Personal notes with dates? - Calendar entries? - Witnesses who would corroborate? ### 2.5 Desired Outcome Questions 11. **"In an ideal world, what outcome would you consider a success?"** - Stay and rehabilitate relationship? - Transfer to different team/role? - Leave with favorable package? - Fight termination legally? - Just survive until next job lined up? 12. **"How committed are you to staying at this company?"** - Very committed - career investment - Open to leaving with right terms - Already checked out, just managing the exit - Want to fight on principle 13. **"What's your financial runway if income stops?"** - Months of expenses covered? - Severance expectations? - Other income sources? - Unemployment eligibility? ### 2.6 Timeline Pressures 14. **"What deadlines are you facing?"** - PIP end date? - Response due date? - Upcoming meetings? - Benefits or vesting cliffs? 15. **"Do you have any upcoming scheduled meetings?"** - HR meetings? - Manager check-ins? - PIP reviews? - Investigation interviews? ## Phase 3: Situation Analysis ### 3.1 Power Dynamics Assessment After completing the interview, analyze: ``` POWER DYNAMICS ANALYSIS ======================= YOUR LEVERAGE: - [ ] Documented strong performance history - [ ] Protected class status with pattern evidence - [ ] Witnesses who support your account - [ ] Evidence of policy violations by employer - [ ] Unique knowledge/relationships hard to replace - [ ] Pending vesting, bonus, or benefits - [ ] Retaliation timeline (complaint → adverse action) - [ ] Inconsistent treatment vs. peers (documented) EMPLOYER'S LEVERAGE: - [ ] Documented performance concerns (with dates/specifics) - [ ] Strong "just cause" documentation (Ontario: high bar to meet) - [ ] Prior warnings in your file - [ ] Legitimate business reasons for concerns - [ ] Clear policy violations on your part - [ ] Other employees corroborating their view - [ ] Enforceable employment contract limiting notice entitlements DOCUMENTATION STRENGTH: - Your documentation: [Strong/Medium/Weak] - Their documentation: [Strong/Medium/Weak] - Gap assessment: [Who has better paper trail?] ``` ### 3.2 Pattern Recognition Analyze for common scenarios: **Standard PIP-to-Termination Playbook**: - PIP with impossible/subjective goals - Weekly check-ins documenting "failures" - 30-90 day timeline - Predetermined outcome **Signs of Pretextual Termination**: - Sudden negative feedback after years of good reviews - Goals changed or made more difficult - Excluded from projects/meetings - Micromanagement of previously autonomous employee - Timing correlates with protected activity **Legitimate Performance Issues**: - Consistent feedback over time - Specific, measurable concerns - Reasonable opportunity to improve - Support resources offered ### 3.3 Risk Assessment Matrix Create risk assessment: ``` RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX ====================== | Factor | Level | Evidence | Notes | |--------|-------|----------|-------| | Termination likelihood | 🔴 High / 🟡 Medium / 🟢 Low | [specific indicators] | | | Legal claim viability | 🔴 High / 🟡 Medium / 🟢 Low | [specific factors] | | | Negotiation leverage | 🔴 High / 🟡 Medium / 🟢 Low | [specific points] | | | Reference damage risk | 🔴 High / 🟡 Medium / 🟢 Low | [specific concerns] | | | Timeline pressure | 🔴 Urgent / 🟡 Moderate / 🟢 Flexible | [deadlines] | | ``` ## Phase 4: Strategic Options Presentation Present 3-5 strategic paths with honest assessments: ### Option 1: Fight to Stay **Strategy**: Engage constructively with PIP/process, document everything, meet or exceed requirements **Required Actions**: - Create detailed tracking of all PIP requirements - Document every success and positive interaction - Request clarification of ambiguous goals IN WRITING - Build relationships with skip-level and allies - Consider requesting different reviewer/manager **Success Factors**: - PIP goals are achievable and measurable - Manager/HR acting in good faith - No predetermined outcome evidence - Strong historical performance to reference **Success Probability**: [Assess based on interview] **Risks**: - Months of stress with uncertain outcome - May be managing to a predetermined result - Reference may be damaged regardless - Time not spent on job search **What "Winning" Looks Like**: - Complete PIP successfully - Relationship reset (or transfer) - Career continues at company - But: May always have target on back ### Option 2: Negotiate Exit Package **Strategy**: Recognize writing on wall, shift focus to maximizing departure terms **Typical Package Components (Ontario)**: - Severance pay (common law: often 1 month per year of service, negotiable, can exceed ESA minimums) - Benefits continuation (extended health, dental, life insurance coverage) - Outplacement services - Reference letter (pre-negotiated language) - Record of Employment (ROE) coding for EI eligibility - Vesting acceleration for stock/options - Bonus proration - Non-disparagement (mutual) - Full and final release of claims **Leverage Points for Negotiation**: - Protected class concerns (even if not pursuing claim) - Documentation of inconsistent treatment - Knowledge of company issues - Pending projects/transition needs - Embarrassment avoidance - Legal costs they'd incur defending **Timing Considerations**: - Before PIP ends (more leverage) - Before formal termination - Before burning bridges - After documenting concerns in writing **What to Ask For (Ontario)** (realistic ranges): - Severance: ESA minimum PLUS common law top-up (total 1-24 months depending on tenure, age, position) - Neutral reference letter (specific language you approve) - Extended benefits continuation 3-12 months (health, dental, life insurance) - ROE coded as "dismissal without cause" (Block 16: Code M) for EI eligibility - "Position eliminated" or "mutual separation" language - Outplacement services ($2K-10K value) ### Option 3: Strategic Resignation **When This Makes Sense**: - No leverage for negotiated exit - Mental health priority - Job already lined up - Want to control narrative - Company culture too toxic to navigate **Pros**: - Control your narrative - Leave on your terms - Preserve reference potential - Protect mental health - No termination on record **Cons**: - No severance - May complicate EI eligibility (voluntary quit has waiting period) - Gives up potential leverage - May feel like "letting them win" **How to Execute**: - Line up next opportunity first if possible - Give professional notice - Brief, professional resignation letter - Don't burn bridges in exit interview - Request reference letter before departing ### Option 4: Legal Consultation Path **Indicators Suggesting Legal Review**: - Clear protected class pattern - Retaliation timing - Documented inconsistent treatment - Witnesses willing to corroborate - Company policy violations - Significant damages (long tenure, high comp) **What Employment Lawyers Look For (Ontario)**: - Wrongful dismissal: Termination without adequate notice or just cause - Human rights violations: Discrimination under Ontario Human Rights Code - Constructive dismissal: Fundamental breach of employment contract - Similarly situated comparators treated differently - Documented pattern of behavior - Credible witnesses **Cost/Benefit Reality (Ontario)**: - Contingency cases available for strong wrongful dismissal claims - Hourly representation: $300-600 CAD/hour - Most cases settle, few go to trial - Process takes 6 months - 2+ years - Ontario small claims court (up to $35K) allows self-representation - Superior Court for larger claims **How to Find Qualified Counsel (Ontario)**: - Law Society of Ontario Lawyer Referral Service (free 30-min consultation) - Ontario Bar Association Employment Law Section - Canadian Association of Labour Lawyers - Initial consultations often free or nominal fee - Get 2-3 opinions before deciding **For US users**: Contact state bar association, NELA (National Employment Law Association), or local employment lawyers. ### Option 5: Parallel Job Search **Often Combined with Options 1-4** **Immediate Actions**: - Update resume (use `/buildresume` if job posting available) - Activate network discretely - Set up job alerts - Consider recruiters
Auf GitHub ansehen
Diese SKILL.md ist sehr gross, daher zeigt SkillsMP hier nur den ersten Abschnitt. Auf GitHub ansehen