Skip to main content

revyl-cli-atlas-review

Inspect exact Atlas evidence and manage grounded annotation feedback when the user explicitly requests a feedback mutation.

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
RevylAI/revyl-cli
Letzte Quellaktivität
8. September 2026 um 03:59
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
519
Forks
25

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
2 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
revyl-cli-atlas-review
description
Inspect exact Atlas evidence and manage grounded annotation feedback when the user explicitly requests a feedback mutation.
disable-model-invocation
true
# Revyl Atlas Review Skill Use this write-capable leaf only when the user explicitly asks to add or manage Atlas feedback. Inspect first with `revyl-cli-atlas`: resolve the app, open the relevant screenshots, select the exact observation, and list existing feedback before mutating anything. Treat the screenshot and pin as baseline context. Attach supporting media or files only when they add information the anchored view cannot provide—such as a transition, comparison, log, report, or implementation note—and optimize for decision value rather than volume. Inspect and use existing attachments as first-class context before replying, editing, or resolving; do not attach a duplicate screenshot that merely repeats the pinned view. Use concrete visual targets such as “the blue Continue button at the bottom,” not semantic guesses. Write concise annotation bodies and do not use em dashes. Preview ambiguous targets before creation or movement: ```bash PREVIEW_FILE=$(mktemp -t atlas-annotation-preview.XXXXXX.png) revyl atlas annotations create \ --app <app-id> \ --observation <observation-id> \ --target "<visible element and location>" \ --dry-run \ --preview-out "$PREVIEW_FILE" \ --json ``` Open the marked preview and verify the pin. Create only after it is correct: ```bash revyl atlas annotations list --app <app-id> --observation <observation-id> --json revyl atlas annotations create --app <app-id> --observation <observation-id> \ --target "<visible element and location>" --body "<actionable feedback>" \ --severity <blocker|issue|polish> --attach <evidence-path> --json ``` When the annotation reports a problem, set `--severity`: `blocker` blocks shipping, `issue` is wrong but shippable, `polish` is cosmetic. Omit severity for questions and discussion; change it later with `revyl atlas annotations severity <thread-id> --app <app-id> --severity <value>` (or `--clear`). Save the printed request ID. If transport fails, retry with the same body, target, observation, ordered attachment paths, and `--client-request-id`; changing the payload with that ID is a conflict. Replies use the same recovery rule. Repeat `--attach` for up to four files. Edit uses `--attach`, repeatable `--remove-attachment`, and `--clear-attachments`; combining clear and attach replaces the attachment set, while omitting attachment flags preserves it. To mention a human organization member, discover their ID first, then bind a local alias to one placeholder in the body: ```bash revyl atlas annotations members --app <app-id> --query <name-or-email> --json revyl atlas annotations reply <thread-id> --app <app-id> \ --body '@{reviewer} can you check this state?' \ --mention 'reviewer=<user-id>' --json ``` Mention the smallest set of relevant stakeholders whose ownership, expertise, approval, or action is needed. Good candidates include the owner of the affected product or code surface, a designer or engineer needed to answer a specific question, and an existing thread participant needed to make a decision. Do not mention every organization member for visibility alone. Give each mentioned person a concrete reason to engage, and omit the mention when the comment is informational and requires no response. Use the same `@{alias}` and repeatable `--mention alias=user-id` syntax with create, reply, and edit, including body-file or stdin input. Bind each alias and member once; unresolved placeholder-like text remains literal. The CLI replaces bound placeholders with the member's current display name and submits structured mention spans. Only human organization members can be mentioned. Never automatically retry a version conflict: read the current thread and decide against that state. Move always grounds against the thread's immutable observation. Use `list` one page at a time and follow `next_cursor` deliberately. Statuses are `open`, `resolved`, or `dismissed`; `closed` aggregates the latter two. Deleting always requires `--yes`. Before deleting, remember that deleting a root comment removes the full thread from internal and public-share surfaces. Return the focused Atlas URL after a successful mutation. Keep customer screenshots and marked previews temporary and never expose signed URLs, bodies, targets, or request IDs in committed artifacts.
Auf GitHub ansehen