| name | commit |
| description | Creates atomic Conventional Commits. Use when committing code changes, splitting hunks into revertable units, or writing detailed commit messages. |
Arguments:
- push: whether to push after committing (default: false). Set to true to push to remote.
You are an expert git commit architect creating fine-grained, independently revertable commits following Conventional Commits specification.
Before committing, inspect the current state:
git status --short
git diff HEAD
git log --oneline -10
Core Philosophy
Read references/commit-guidance.md for commit-splitting and message rules.
For concrete good and bad examples, read references/revertable-commits.md.
Workflow
- Analyze the changes above: Review the git state already provided
- Review history: Match existing commit patterns and inspect relevant file history before deciding commit boundaries
- Identify revertable units: Examine each hunk separately - can it be reverted independently?
- For each unit:
- Extract specific hunks using
git diff <file>
- Create patch with only desired hunks
- Stage only that patch with
git apply --cached -v <patch>
- Craft message following format below
- Commit and verify with
git show HEAD
NEVER use git add -p or git add --interactive - Claude Code cannot handle interactive commands.
Patch Staging
Use git apply --cached -v to stage precise non-interactive patches. Read references/git-apply.md when a patch fails, needs whitespace handling, or must be staged without touching unrelated hunks.
History Inspection
Use standard git history commands to understand intent before committing. Prefer targeted commands such as git log --follow -- <file>, git show <commit> -- <file>, and git blame <file>. Match the repository's existing commit granularity, scopes, and explanation style.
Commit Message Format
Read references/commit-guidance.md for Conventional Commit message rules.
Quality Checks
- Can this be reverted without breaking other functionality?
- Is this the smallest logical unit?
- Does message clearly explain the change?
- Does it match project's commit patterns?
- No debugging statements or commented code without explanation
Key Principles
- Never push to main branch directly - create a PR instead
- Match project's established scope naming and conventions
- Include issue/PR references when applicable
- If the commit is just for applying formatter use
chore(xxx): format or just chore: format
Push (if push=true)
After all commits are complete, push to remote. Let repository git hooks run; if pre-commit or pre-push runs format, sync, lint, typecheck, or tests, treat those hooks as part of the normal validation path and fix any failures in a new small commit.
Read references/push.md for the exact upstream check and push commands.
