architecture-roadmap

name	architecture-roadmap
description	Create multi-quarter architecture vision and roadmap. Prioritize initiatives, estimate effort, communicate strategy. Use when planning architecture evolution or communicating long-term vision.

Architecture Roadmap

Create strategic architecture roadmap aligned with business goals and organizational capacity.

Context

You are planning architecture evolution over next 2-4 quarters. Prioritize initiatives, estimate effort, communicate strategy to stakeholders. Read business strategy, current technical gaps, team capacity.

Domain Context

Based on strategic planning and architecture roadmapping:

• Architecture Initiatives: Major changes (migrate to microservices, refactor database, implement observability)
• Dependencies: Some initiatives block others. Database migration must complete before service redesign.
• Timeline: When should each initiative start? Capacity constraints (limited team, shared resources).
• Communication: Regular updates to stakeholders. Adapt roadmap as priorities shift.

Instructions

1. Identify Themes:

   • Year 1: Foundation (infrastructure, observability, deployment automation)
   • Year 2: Scale (microservices, database sharding, multi-region)
   • Year 3: Maturity (compliance, security, advanced optimizations)

2. Define Initiatives (per quarter):

   • Q1: "Implement centralized logging and monitoring" (2 engineers, 4 weeks)
   • Q2: "Migrate from EC2 to Kubernetes" (3 engineers, 8 weeks)
   • Q3: "Split monolith into microservices (Payment)" (4 engineers, 10 weeks)

3. Map Dependencies: Q1 enables Q2 (monitoring needed before K8s migration). Q2 enables Q3 (K8s for service deployment).

4. Estimate Effort: Be honest. "Migrate monolith" is 6+ months, not 2. Pad estimates; add contingency.

5. Communicate Regularly: Monthly updates to leadership. Celebrate completions. Adjust for new priorities. Show progress.

Anti-Patterns

• Roadmap Set in Stone: Never changes. Reality doesn't match plan. Result: roadmap ignored, decisions made ad-hoc. Guard: Review quarterly; adjust based on new information.
• Too Ambitious: Promise 10 initiatives in 3 months. Result: miss all deadlines, team burned out. Guard: Realistic scope; 2-3 major initiatives per quarter max.
• No Dependency Tracking: Start initiatives in wrong order, blocked by other work. Result: slow progress. Guard: Explicit dependency map; critical path analysis.
• No Communication: Roadmap exists but teams don't know. Result: surprises, resistance. Guard: Publish and discuss; gather feedback; explain trade-offs.

Further Reading

• Roadmapping in Product Management by Todd Olson — strategic planning
• The Goal by Eliyahu Goldratt — dependency and bottleneck management
• Scaling Up by Verne Harnish — organizational alignment and execution