context-engineer

name	context-engineer
description	The concierge proxy — turn a vague user script ("I need the agent to help me do X") into a context contract, route it to the right skills/workflows, add backpressure (tests/evals/reviews/approvals), execute, and report. Use when a request is multi-step, durable, or human-in-the-loop and you'd otherwise hand-roll the orchestration; skip it for a single prompt → single answer.

Context Engineer

context-engineer is an archived Smithers concierge example: a proxy agent that takes a user's half-formed request and produces an executable, durable, observable run. It is not installed by init; copy examples/init-pack/context-engineer.tsx and its dependency closure into a project, or ask the seeded create-workflow workflow to build an equivalent.

The job

The user says "I need the agent to help me do X." They do not know — and never need to know — what "context engineering" is. Your job is to convert that script into five concrete things:

1. a context contract — goal, non-goals, assumptions, inputs (+ where each comes from), constraints, risks, desired artifacts, success criteria;
2. a route — the smallest sufficient path: one task, a set of skills, or a durable sub-workflow;
3. a backpressure plan — every success criterion mapped to a verification gate (schema / test / eval / review / approval / trace);
4. executed artifacts — the work actually carried out (or dispatched), looped until the gates pass;
5. a report — a legible, self-contained HTML slideshow of what happened.

The differentiator is the proxy layer: the user answers business/domain questions; you (and Smithers) answer all the agent-engineering ones.

The layered model

Think of an agent as a control system, not a prompt. Prompt (instructions, examples, output format) → context (what info/tools/memory/schema enters each step) → harness (runtime, tools, permissions, retries, fresh-context loops) → workflow (graph, parallelism, review loops, approvals, resumability) → backpressure (every desired behavior gets a gate). The user owns only the prompt's intent; Smithers owns the outer four layers — context lives in the workflow graph + memory, the harness in agents.ts/sandboxes/repoCommands, the workflow in the runtime, and backpressure in the gate matrix. context-engineer is the agent that fills those layers for the user.

The operating loop

This mirrors the workflow's <Sequence> — classify → inventory → grill → route → backpressure → approve → execute → report.

• Intake & classify (classify-script): read the script, name the modes it touches (research / planning / implementation / debug / report), and decide durable — does it earn a real workflow, or is it one task?
• Build a context inventory (inventory-context): scan the repo, available tools/commands, .smithers/skills, and memory to draft the contract. Fill gaps with explicit assumptions; list what's truly missingInputs.
• Grill — only to reduce risk (context-engineer:grill, the <GrillMe> component): ask one question at a time, each with a recommended answer + the reason, and stop the moment the remaining ambiguity no longer changes the plan. Never ask what's discoverable from repo/docs/tools/memory — auto-answer those yourself. Every ambiguity resolves to assumption | question | deferred decision.
• Maintain a visible contract: the contract is the shared artifact. Keep it current so the human can read goal/non-goals/criteria at any point.
• Backpressure (build-backpressure): turn each success criterion into ≥1 gate with a verificationMethod (schema | unit_test | integration_test | eval | review | approval | trace | manual_check) and a gateType (blocking | warning | informational). The contract is not "ready" until every blocking criterion names a verification method.
• Approve (approve-contract): a durable <Approval> gate so a human signs off on contract + route + gates before any side effects.
• Execute (execute:loop, a <Ralph>): run or dispatch the routed work, looping until the gates pass; on repeated failure, revise context/harness, not just the prompt.
• Report (report): emit the HTML slideshow from run state.

How to run it

# Launch the concierge on a vague script. --review true (default) inserts the
# approval gate; --review false runs straight through.
bunx smithers-orchestrator workflow run context-engineer \
  --prompt "I need the agent to help me harden our rate limiting and prove it works"

# Watch it
bunx smithers-orchestrator ps                       # active / paused / recent runs
bunx smithers-orchestrator logs <run-id> -f         # follow the event stream
bunx smithers-orchestrator inspect <run-id>         # full run state (contract, route, gates)
bunx smithers-orchestrator why <run-id>             # why is it paused?

# Clear the design-approval gate once you've read the contract
bunx smithers-orchestrator approve <run-id> --node approve-contract --by <name>
bunx smithers-orchestrator deny <run-id> --node approve-contract   # send it back

# Bail out
bunx smithers-orchestrator cancel <run-id>

The run pauses durably at approve-contract — a suspended run is a row, not a process, so it costs nothing while it waits for you. After approval it proceeds to execute and report.

Cheaper / adjacent paths:

• route-task — the degenerate concierge for "just run one task." It classifies a script and either runs it as a single task or recommends the right durable workflow. Reach for it when the work is clearly one-shot; a single task is a first-class outcome, not a routing failure.
• create-workflow / create-skill — authoring, not execution. When the route is "we need a new durable workflow / a new reusable skill," dispatch these to build it (clarify → provision → design → approve → scaffold → verify → document), then run the result.

When to use vs. skip

• Single prompt → single answer, or a one-off edit you can just do: skip the concierge and answer directly. The overhead buys nothing.
• Clearly one task, just find the right home for it: use route-task.
• Multi-step, needs ordering / crash-recovery / a human gate / loop-until-true, or the user wants work to keep going while they're away: use context-engineer. That's exactly the case where a contract + route + backpressure + durable execution + report pays off.

Reference

context-engineer composes GrillMe, the inventory/route/backpressure prompts in .smithers/prompts/context-engineer-*.mdx, an <Approval> gate, and a <Ralph> execute loop. Read skills/smithers/SKILL.md for the runtime mental model and the full CLI catalog, and docs/llms-core.txt for the exact component/CLI surface.