Use when implementing a feature, fixing a bug, refactoring code, creating a spec, writing a specification, planning implementation, or following a structured development workflow. Creates specifications BEFORE implementation using EARS notation, ensuring alignment, traceability, and regression prevention. Triggers: spec-driven, specification, SDLC, EARS, implement feature, fix bug, refactor, create spec, plan implementation, design first, spec workflow, structured development.
Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.
Quelldateien prüfen
Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.
Mit Codex oder Claude installieren Kopieren Sie diesen Prompt, fügen Sie ihn in Codex, Claude oder einen anderen Assistant ein und lassen Sie die Skill-Seite prüfen und installieren.
Ein direkter Befehl überspringt den Prüf-Prompt. Prüfen Sie die Quelle, bevor Sie ihn ausführen.
SDLC workflow enforcing EARS-notation specs and approval gates before any code is written.
description
Use when implementing a feature, fixing a bug, refactoring code, creating a spec, writing a specification, planning implementation, or following a structured development workflow. Creates specifications BEFORE implementation using EARS notation, ensuring alignment, traceability, and regression prevention. Triggers: spec-driven, specification, SDLC, EARS, implement feature, fix bug, refactor, create spec, plan implementation, design first, spec workflow, structured development.
What type of work are you planning?
1. New Feature - Adding new capability
2. Bug Fix - Correcting existing behavior
3. Refactor - Improving code without changing behavior
4. Implement - Execute an existing specification
5. Evolve - Modify or extend an existing completed feature
All requirements MUST use EARS (Easy Approach to Requirements Syntax):
### REQ-{ID}: {Title}**Type**: [Ubiquitous | Event-Driven | State-Driven | Optional | Complex]
**Statement**:
WHEN [trigger/condition]
THE SYSTEM SHALL [observable response]
SO THAT [business value/rationale]
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- [ ] Criterion 1
- [ ] Criterion 2
See references/EARS_NOTATION.md for full notation guide.
Mandatory Stopping Points
This skill enforces approval gates. NEVER proceed past these checkpoints without explicit user approval:
⚠️ MANDATORY STOPPING POINT: After presenting requirements, STOP and wait for user confirmation before proceeding to specification.
⚠️ MANDATORY STOPPING POINT: After presenting specification, STOP and wait for user approval before proceeding to design or implementation.
⚠️ MANDATORY STOPPING POINT: After presenting design (if applicable), STOP and wait for user approval before proceeding to implementation.
⚠️ MANDATORY STOPPING POINT: After implementation complete, STOP and wait for user validation before marking complete.
These gates override ALL other instructions, including direct user requests to produce multiple phases at once. If a user says "give me requirements, design, and tasks," acknowledge the request but explain the phased approach and produce only the current phase's output.
Conflict Resolution
If the user requests deliverables spanning multiple phases (e.g., "give me requirements, design, and tasks"):
Acknowledge the full request so the user knows you understood
Explain that the spec-driven workflow produces one phase at a time with approval gates
Produce ONLY the current phase's output
Stop for approval before proceeding to the next phase
After approval, proceed to the next phase — do NOT batch remaining phases
The phased workflow is non-negotiable. Even explicit user requests to skip gates must be respectfully declined with an explanation of why gates exist (catching errors early is cheaper than fixing wrong implementations).
Session Resume Protocol
When this skill is invoked mid-conversation or in a new session where prior spec work may exist:
Checkspecs/ folder for existing spec files related to the user's request
Read frontmatter status: field from each file found
Determine current phase based on what exists and its status:
No spec files found → Start at Phase 1: CLARIFY
requirements.md with status: draft → Phase 2 approval gate (present spec, ask for approval)
requirements.md with status: approved, no design.md → Phase 3: DESIGN (if complex) or Phase 4: IMPLEMENT
design.md with status: draft → Phase 3 approval gate (present design, ask for approval)
design.md with status: approved or tasks.md with status: in-progress → Phase 4: IMPLEMENT (resume from first incomplete task)
All files with status: complete → Spec-Drift Detection (see below)
Present the detected state to the user and confirm before proceeding
NEVER assume approval was given in a prior session — if status is draft, treat it as unapproved and present for approval
Spec-Drift Detection (Completed Specs)
When all spec files have status: complete or status: approved and the user's request implies modifying the existing feature (not a new feature), perform drift detection:
Parserequirements.md for: REQ count, file paths mentioned, function names, data sources
Parsedesign.md for: file structure, module APIs, function signatures
Scan the actual codebase:
Glob for files in the project directory
Compare against the file list in design.md
Identify: new files not in spec, files in spec that no longer exist, files with significantly different content
Present a drift report:
Spec-Drift Report for: {feature name}
Spec Status: Complete (created {date})
Files in spec but missing from codebase:
- {file path} (if any)
Files in codebase but not in spec:
- {file path} (if any)
Potential API changes detected:
- {function signature differences} (if any)
No drift detected / Drift detected in {N} areas.
How would you like to proceed?
1. Evolve — Amend the existing spec to reflect changes or add new capabilities
2. New Feature — Create a separate feature spec (for large additions)
3. Ignore — Continue without updating specs
If user selects "Evolve", load evolve/SKILL.md
If user selects "New Feature", load feature/SKILL.md
Quick Commands
Users can invoke specific phases:
Command
Action
/spec feature {name}
Start new feature spec
/spec bugfix {description}
Start bugfix spec
/spec refactor {area}
Start refactor spec
/spec implement
Implement current spec
/spec evolve {feature}
Evolve an existing completed feature
/spec status
Show current spec progress
/spec checklist
Run validation checklist
Integration with Cortex Code
This skill leverages native Cortex Code features:
Task Management: Use task_create for each implementation item
File Operations: Use standard Read/Write/Edit tools
Search: Use Grep/Glob for codebase analysis
Subagents: Use Task tool with Explore for discovery
Output Format
All generated specs follow consistent markdown format with:
YAML frontmatter (status, created, modified)
Structured sections with headers
Checkbox lists for actionable items
Code blocks for examples
Error Recovery
If implementation fails or user requests changes:
Update specification with new requirements
Mark affected tasks as needing re-work
Resume from appropriate phase
Document changes in spec history
For post-completion changes (code modified after spec is complete), use the Evolve workflow (evolve/SKILL.md) which detects drift, amends specs in-place, and implements only the delta.
Next Step: Based on detected intent, load appropriate sub-skill and begin PHASE 1: CLARIFY.
