| name | bio-human-feedback |
| description | Phase 2.6 of the bio-manuscript pipeline: human review checkpoint. Use when presenting a refined proposal to a human reviewer, collecting explicit feedback, recording approval or requested changes, and routing the workflow back to the correct phase. |
bio-human-feedback
Phase 2.6: Human review checkpoint (人类反馈验证)
Present the refined proposal to a human reviewer, collect feedback, and decide whether to continue or loop back for revision.
Purpose
- Present the current proposal in a concise reviewable form
- Wait for explicit human feedback
- Record approval or requested changes
- Route the workflow back to the correct phase if needed
Inputs
FINAL_PROPOSAL.md
- current round number
Workflow
- Present the proposal summary
- Wait for approval or feedback
- Classify the feedback severity
- Record the response and decide the next phase
Human Review Summary Format
# Proposal Review - Round X
## Innovation Summary
- ...
## Figure Overview
- Figure 1:
- Figure 2:
## Experimental Plan
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Baseline |
|------|---------|--------|----------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |
## Key Decisions Requiring Human Approval
1. ...
2. ...
## Reviewer Summary
| Reviewer | Score / status | Main advice |
|----------|----------------|-------------|
| Editor | ... | ... |
| Computational | ... | ... |
| Biological | ... | ... |
## Human Decision
- Approve and continue
- Request revisions
Feedback Severity
- Critical: return to early planning
- Major: return to design / manuscript refinement
- Minor: revise locally and continue
Files To Record
refine-logs/human-feedback/feedback-round-X.md
refine-logs/HUMAN_APPROVAL.md
Usage
/bio-human-feedback --round 2 --proposal refine-logs/FINAL_PROPOSAL.md
Notes
- Do not continue automatically without explicit human approval.
- Record all human feedback in the workspace.
- Keep the requested decisions concise and actionable.