funding-squeeze

name	funding-squeeze
description	Use when writing a strategy that captures short-squeeze setups on Hyperliquid perps — squeeze, short squeeze fuel, negative funding rally, fade the shorts, paid to long. Goes long when funding APR is deeply negative and price is already rising, then exits on funding normalisation or a time stop. Reads squeeze fuel rather than funding-harvest carry.
metadata	{"version":"0.1.0","updated":"2026-05-08T00:00:00.000Z"}

Strategy: Funding · Short-Squeeze Fuel

When to use

A user asks for "squeeze trade", "fade the shorts", "short squeeze fuel", "longs eat shorts", "negative funding rally", or any framing where they want to ride the squeeze by going long when the order book is short-heavy and the price is already turning up.

This is the inverse of pure carry: instead of waiting for funding to mean-revert (strategy-funding-rate-arbitrage), this strategy enters when shorts are getting squeezed harder (funding worsening AND price rising), expecting forced unwinds to fuel further upside.

Honest framing — when this works and when it doesn't

Squeeze setups are time-sensitive and regime-dependent:

• Best regime: choppy or rotating markets where shorts get caught after a deeper pullback. Recent up-move + persistent negative funding = textbook fuel.
• Worst regime: structural downtrends. Negative funding is normal in bear markets — shorts are right, not trapped. Without confirming up-move, this strategy gets stopped repeatedly.
• The take-profit problem: squeezes are explosive and reverse fast. Holding past funding normalisation gives the gain back.

Use the time-stop and the funding-flip exit. Don't try to ride the trend after funding turns positive.

Backtest reference

Window	BTC/USDC:USDC 1h, 2026-01-01 → 2026-05-01 (BTC −13% over the window)
Trades	8
Win rate	38% (3W / 5L)
Wallet PnL	−0.75%
Sharpe	−0.75
Max drawdown	0.75%
Avg holding	12h 30m
Backtest ID	01kr42gvqnyessxdrsf3qym7sa
Exit-reason mix	6 signal exits · 1 trailing-stop win · 1 stoploss

The strategy executed correctly — the negative PnL is a regime call, not a broken implementation. The window covers BTC's −13% slide; long-only squeezes in a structural downtrend get stopped repeatedly. The trailing-stop win shows the trade thesis works when a squeeze actually catches (the one trade that resolved up made +1.3%); the issue is that the entry filter fired on too many bear-market dead-cat bounces.

Two practical refinements before recommending live:

1. Add a higher-timeframe regime filter (e.g. only enter when 1d close > 1d ema_50). Removes most of the bear-market false starts.
2. Run on a multi-pair scan rather than BTC alone. Squeezes are uncorrelated across alts — diversification compounds.

See docs/alpha-scan-improvement-plan.md for context on the squeeze-fuel bucket of the alpha scan.

The Freqtrade primitive that makes this work

Same dp.get_pair_dataframe(candle_type="funding_rate") pattern as strategy-funding-rate-arbitrage — Hyperliquid funds hourly and the data is auto-downloaded for backtest. Layer the recent return condition on top.

Reference implementation

from freqtrade.strategy import IStrategy
from datetime import datetime
import pandas as pd
import talib.abstract as ta


class FundingSqueezeStrategy(IStrategy):
    minimal_roi = {"0": 100.0}     # exits managed by the funding flip + time stop
    stoploss = -0.04
    trailing_stop = True
    trailing_stop_positive = 0.02
    trailing_stop_positive_offset = 0.03
    trailing_only_offset_is_reached = True
    timeframe = "1h"
    process_only_new_candles = True
    startup_candle_count = 30
    can_short = False

    def populate_indicators(self, dataframe: pd.DataFrame, metadata: dict) -> pd.DataFrame:
        # Funding rate via the dedicated candle type. HL funds hourly.
        try:
            funding = self.dp.get_pair_dataframe(
                pair=metadata["pair"],
                timeframe="1h",
                candle_type="funding_rate",
            )
        except Exception:
            funding = pd.DataFrame()

        if not funding.empty and "open" in funding.columns:
            f = funding[["date", "open"]].rename(columns={"open": "funding_rate"}).copy()
            dataframe = dataframe.merge(f, on=, how=)
            dataframe[] = dataframe[].ffill().fillna()
            
            dataframe[] = dataframe[] *  * 
        :
            dataframe[] = 
            dataframe[] = 

        
        dataframe[] = dataframe[].pct_change()
        dataframe[] = dataframe[].pct_change()
        dataframe[] = ta.ATR(dataframe, timeperiod=)
        dataframe[] = dataframe[].rolling().mean()
         dataframe

     () -> pd.DataFrame:
        
        
        dataframe.loc[
            (dataframe[] < -)
            & (dataframe[] > )
            & (dataframe[] > )
            & (dataframe[] > dataframe[])
            & (dataframe[] > ),
            ,
        ] = 
         dataframe

     () -> pd.DataFrame:
        
        
        dataframe.loc[(dataframe[] >= ), ] = 
         dataframe

     ():
        
        
        elapsed_h = (current_time - trade.open_date_utc).total_seconds() / 
         elapsed_h >= :
             
         

Config requirements

{
  "exchange": { "name": "hyperliquid", "pair_whitelist": ["BTC/USDC:USDC"] },
  "stake_currency": "USDC",
  "stake_amount": 100,
  "timeframe": "1h",
  "max_open_trades": 1,
  "stoploss": -0.04,
  "trailing_stop": true,
  "trailing_stop_positive": 0.02,
  "trailing_stop_positive_offset": 0.03,
  "trailing_only_offset_is_reached": true,
  "minimal_roi": { "0":  
   
   
      
      
      

Pair format must be <COIN>/USDC:USDC (futures perp) — spot doesn't have funding.

Tunable parameters

Knob	Effect
funding_apr < -0.10	Stricter (-0.20) → only the deepest squeezes; rare. Looser (-0.05) → more entries, lower per-trade edge.
ret_24h > 0.03	The "move already started" filter. Tighter (> 0.05) waits for clearer momentum; looser (> 0.0) catches earlier but noisier.
trailing_stop_positive_offset	When trailing kicks in. The squeeze should hand you 3% before you start protecting it.
timeout_24h	Squeezes typically resolve within a session. 24h = sane safety net; 12h is more aggressive.

Variants

• Multi-pair scan: replace StaticPairList with VolumePairList filtered to top 30 perps. Squeezes are uncorrelated across pairs — diversifying captures more.
• OI-confirmed variant (Phase 2): require oi_delta_4h > 0.05 to confirm fresh shorts entering, not just stale negative funding. Needs OI history feed.
• Fade-the-squeeze inverse: same setup, but short on extreme squeezes (funding_apr < -0.50) on the assumption the squeeze is exhausted. Higher risk, opposite thesis.

Common pitfalls

1. Entering before the move starts. Negative funding alone is the carry trade (strategy-funding-rate-arbitrage). Waiting for ret_24h > 0 is what makes this a squeeze trade not a carry trade. Don't drop that filter.
2. Holding past the funding flip. When funding goes from -0.10 to +0.05, the structural pressure is gone. Holding for "more upside" is just directional speculation — exit and re-evaluate.
3. Tight stops killing entries. Squeezes are volatile by definition. -0.02 stops chop you out before the move; -0.04 is the practical floor for hourly entries.
4. Spot pair instead of perp. BTC/USDC doesn't have funding rate data — the entry never fires. Always BTC/USDC:USDC.

Sources

• Sibling strategy: the funding-rate-arbitrage skill
• Internal: docs/alpha-scan-improvement-plan.md — squeeze-fuel bucket
• Freqtrade DataProvider — https://www.freqtrade.io/en/stable/strategy-customization/