| name | population-genetics-selection-statistics |
| description | Detect signatures of natural selection using Fst, Tajima's D, iHS, XP-EHH, and other selection statistics. Calculate population differentiation, test for departures from neutrality, and identify selective sweeps with scikit-allel and vcftools. Use when computing selection signatures like Fst or Tajima's D. |
| tool_type | mixed |
| primary_tool | scikit-allel |
Version Compatibility
Reference examples tested with: STAR 2.7.11+, matplotlib 3.8+, numpy 1.26+, scipy 1.12+
Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:
- Python:
pip show <package> then help(module.function) to check signatures
- CLI:
<tool> --version then <tool> --help to confirm flags
If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed
package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.
Selection Statistics
"Scan my population data for signs of natural selection" -> Calculate selection statistics (Fst, Tajima's D, iHS, XP-EHH) to detect selective sweeps and departures from neutrality.
- Python:
allel.moving_hudson_fst(), allel.ihs(), allel.xpehh() (scikit-allel)
- CLI:
vcftools --weir-fst-pop for pairwise Fst
Detect natural selection signatures using diversity statistics and extended haplotype homozygosity.
Fst - Population Differentiation
scikit-allel
import allel
import numpy as np
callset = allel.read_vcf('data.vcf.gz')
gt = allel.GenotypeArray(callset['calldata/GT'])
pos = callset['variants/POS']
subpops = {'pop1': [0, 1, 2, 3, 4], 'pop2': [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]}
ac_subpops = gt.count_alleles_subpops(subpops)
num, den = allel.hudson_fst(ac_subpops['pop1'], ac_subpops['pop2'])
fst_per_snp = num / den
fst_mean = np.nansum(num) / np.nansum(den)
print(f'Mean Fst: {fst_mean:.4f}')
Windowed Fst
fst_windowed, windows, n_snps = allel.windowed_hudson_fst(
pos, ac_subpops['pop1'], ac_subpops['pop2'],
size=100000, step=50000)
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.figure(figsize=(14, 4))
plt.plot(windows[:, 0], fst_windowed)
plt.xlabel('Position')
plt.ylabel('Fst')
plt.savefig('fst_windows.png')
vcftools
vcftools --vcf data.vcf --weir-fst-pop pop1.txt --weir-fst-pop pop2.txt --out fst_result
vcftools --vcf data.vcf --weir-fst-pop pop1.txt --weir-fst-pop pop2.txt \
--fst-window-size 100000 --fst-window-step 50000 --out fst_windowed
Choosing an Fst Estimator
| Estimator | Method | Best for |
|---|
| Weir & Cockerham (1984) | vcftools --weir-fst-pop | Unequal sample sizes; corrects for sample size bias |
| Hudson (Bhatia et al. 2013) | allel.hudson_fst() | Very unequal sample sizes; robust two-population estimator |
| Nei's Gst | allel.average_nei_fst() | Avoid when sample sizes are unequal; biased downward with small samples |
When sample sizes between populations are known and unequal, prefer Weir & Cockerham or Hudson over Nei's Gst. Hudson's estimator is especially robust when one population is much larger than the other (Bhatia et al. 2013).
For genome-wide mean Fst, always compute as ratio-of-averages (sum(numerators) / sum(denominators)), not the arithmetic mean of per-SNP Fst values. Per-SNP ratios are noisy at low-diversity loci and inflate the average.
Fst estimator methodology evolves; before selecting an estimator, verify current best practices by checking the latest scikit-allel and vcftools documentation for any updated or newly recommended approaches.
When Population Labels Are Unknown
When samples lack predefined population assignments, population structure must be inferred before computing Fst:
- Run PCA (
allel.pca() or PLINK --pca) to identify clusters visually
- Use an assignment method (ADMIXTURE,
sklearn.cluster.KMeans on PC space) to assign population labels
- Compute Fst between inferred groups
For continuous population structure (isolation-by-distance, clines), per-population Fst may not be meaningful. Consider instead:
- Pairwise individual-level relatedness or kinship matrices
- Spatial autocorrelation of allele frequencies
- Landscape genomics approaches (see ecological-genomics/landscape-genomics)
Tajima's D - Departures from Neutrality
scikit-allel
import allel
import numpy as np
callset = allel.read_vcf('data.vcf.gz')
gt = allel.GenotypeArray(callset['calldata/GT'])
pos = callset['variants/POS']
ac = gt.count_alleles()
D, windows, counts = allel.windowed_tajima_d(pos, ac, size=100000, step=50000)
plt.figure(figsize=(14, 4))
plt.plot(windows[:, 0], D)
plt.axhline(y=0, color='r', linestyle='--')
plt.xlabel('Position')
plt.ylabel("Tajima's D")
plt.savefig('tajima_d.png')
Interpretation
| D Value | Interpretation |
|---|
| D < -2 | Recent selective sweep or population expansion |
| D ≈ 0 | Neutral evolution |
| D > 2 | Balancing selection or population bottleneck |
vcftools
vcftools --vcf data.vcf --TajimaD 100000 --out tajima
iHS - Integrated Haplotype Score
Detects ongoing selective sweeps.
import allel
import numpy as np
callset = allel.read_vcf('data.vcf.gz')
gt = allel.GenotypeArray(callset['calldata/GT'])
pos = callset['variants/POS']
h = gt.to_haplotypes()
ac = h.count_alleles()
flt = (ac[:, 0] > 1) & (ac[:, 1] > 1)
h_flt = h.compress(flt, axis=0)
pos_flt = pos[flt]
ac_flt = ac.compress(flt, axis=0)
ihs = allel.ihs(h_flt, pos_flt, include_edges=True)
ihs_std = allel.standardize_by_allele_count(ihs, ac_flt[:, 1])
significant_ihs = np.abs(ihs_std[0]) > 2
print(f'Significant iHS hits: {significant_ihs.sum()}')
Plot iHS
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.figure(figsize=(14, 4))
plt.scatter(pos_flt, ihs_std[0], s=1)
plt.axhline(y=2, color='r', linestyle='--')
plt.axhline(y=-2, color='r', linestyle='--')
plt.xlabel('Position')
plt.ylabel('Standardized iHS')
plt.savefig('ihs.png')
XP-EHH - Cross-Population Extended Haplotype Homozygosity
Detects completed sweeps by comparing populations.
import allel
import numpy as np
h = gt.to_haplotypes()
h_pop1 = h.take(pop1_hap_idx, axis=1)
h_pop2 = h.take(pop2_hap_idx, axis=1)
xpehh = allel.xpehh(h_pop1, h_pop2, pos, include_edges=True)
significant = np.abs(xpehh) > 2
print(f'Significant XP-EHH hits: {significant.sum()}')
NSL - Number of Segregating Sites by Length
Alternative to iHS, less sensitive to recombination rate variation.
nsl = allel.nsl(h_flt)
nsl_std = allel.standardize_by_allele_count(nsl, ac_flt[:, 1])
Garud's H Statistics
Detect soft sweeps.
h1, h12, h123, h2_h1 = allel.garud_h(h)
h12_windowed = allel.moving_garud_h(h, size=100)
Composite Selection Score
Combine multiple statistics:
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
def composite_score(fst, tajD, ihs_abs):
fst_rank = stats.rankdata(fst) / len(fst)
tajD_rank = stats.rankdata(-tajD) / len(tajD)
ihs_rank = stats.rankdata(ihs_abs) / len(ihs_abs)
return (fst_rank + tajD_rank + ihs_rank) / 3
css = composite_score(fst_per_snp, tajD_values, np.abs(ihs_values))
Complete Selection Scan
Goal: Scan a genomic region for signatures of natural selection using multiple complementary statistics.
Approach: Filter to segregating biallelic variants, compute windowed Tajima's D for neutrality departures and windowed nucleotide diversity for reduced variation, then visualize both statistics along the chromosome.
import allel
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
callset = allel.read_vcf('data.vcf.gz')
gt = allel.GenotypeArray(callset['calldata/GT'])
pos = callset['variants/POS']
ac = gt.count_alleles()
flt = ac.is_segregating() & (ac.max_allele() == 1)
gt = gt.compress(flt, axis=0)
pos = pos[flt]
ac = ac.compress(flt, axis=0)
window_size = 100000
window_step = 50000
tajD, tajD_windows, _ = allel.windowed_tajima_d(pos, ac, size=window_size, step=window_step)
pi, pi_windows, _, _ = allel.windowed_diversity(pos, ac, size=window_size, step=window_step)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 1, figsize=(14, 8), sharex=True)
axes[0].plot(tajD_windows[:, 0], tajD)
axes[0].axhline(0, color='r', linestyle='--')
axes[0].set_ylabel("Tajima's D")
axes[1].plot(pi_windows[:, 0], pi)
axes[1].set_ylabel('Pi')
axes[1].set_xlabel('Position')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig('selection_scan.png', dpi=150)
Related Skills
- scikit-allel-analysis - Data loading and basic statistics
- population-structure - Population assignment for Fst
- linkage-disequilibrium - EHH depends on LD patterns
- ecological-genomics/landscape-genomics - Genotype-environment association for non-model organisms