Skip to main content

acceptance-orchestrator

"Implement — Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment,"

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
thiagofernandes1987-create/APEX
Letzte Quellaktivität
18. April 2026 um 09:35
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
2
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
acceptance-orchestrator
description
"Implement — Use when a coding task should be driven end-to-end from issue intake through implementation, review, deployment,"
# Acceptance Orchestrator ## Overview Orchestrate coding work as a state machine that ends only when acceptance criteria are verified with evidence or the task is explicitly escalated. Core rule: **do not optimize for "code changed"; optimize for "DoD proven".** ## When to Use - The task already has an issue or clear acceptance criteria and should run end-to-end with minimal human re-intervention. - You need structured handoff across implementation, review, deployment, and final verification. - You want explicit stop conditions and escalation instead of silent partial completion. ## Required Sub-Skills - `create-issue-gate` - `closed-loop-delivery` - `verification-before-completion` Optional supporting skills: - `deploy-dev` - `pr-watch` - `pr-review-autopilot` - `git-ship` ## Inputs Require these inputs: - issue id or issue body - issue status - acceptance criteria (DoD) - target environment (`dev` default) Fixed defaults: - max iteration rounds = `2` - PR review polling = `3m -> 6m -> 10m` ## State Machine - `intake` - `issue-gated` - `executing` - `review-loop` - `deploy-verify` - `accepted` - `escalated` ## Workflow 1. **Intake** - Read issue and extract task goal + DoD. 2. **Issue gate** - Use `create-issue-gate` logic. - If issue is not `ready` or execution gate is not `allowed`, stop immediately. - Do not implement anything while issue remains `draft`. 3. **Execute** - Hand off to `closed-loop-delivery` for implementation and local verification. 4. **Review loop** - If PR feedback is relevant, batch polling windows as: - wait `3m` - then `6m` - then `10m` - After the `10m` round, stop waiting and process all visible comments together. 5. **Deploy and runtime verification** - If DoD depends on runtime behavior, deploy only to `dev` by default. - Verify with real logs/API/Lambda behavior, not assumptions. 6. **Completion gate** - Before any claim of completion, require `verification-before-completion`. - No success claim without fresh evidence. ## Stop Conditions Move to `accepted` only when every acceptance criterion has matching evidence. Move to `escalated` when any of these happen: - DoD still fails after `2` full rounds - missing secrets/permissions/external dependency blocks progress - task needs production action or destructive operation approval - review instructions conflict and cannot both be satisfied ## Human Gates Always stop for human confirmation on: - prod/stage deploys beyond agreed scope - destructive git/data operations - billing or security posture changes - missing user-provided acceptance criteria ## Output Contract When reporting status, always include: - `Status`: intake / executing / accepted / escalated - `Acceptance Criteria`: pass/fail checklist - `Evidence`: commands, logs, API results, or runtime proof - `Open Risks`: anything still uncertain - `Need Human Input`: smallest next decision, if blocked Do not report "done" unless status is `accepted`. ## Diff History - **v00.33.0**: Ingested from antigravity-awesome-skills community repo --- ## Why This Skill Exists Implement — <!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter `purpose`/`description` (OPP-Phase3). Expand with domain-specific rationale. --> ## What If Fails - condition: Código não disponível para análise <!-- SR_40: auto-generated from frontmatter `what_if_fails` (OPP-Phase3). -->
Auf GitHub ansehen